You probably know this, but it was thought to stand for "young upwardly-mobile professional" or "young urban professional". There may be some too young to remember.
Does it really help people to not question their belief that "toxic masculinity" has contributed to their condition?
Would we not normally be asking: where is the evidence, where is the control group? If you insist on the term "toxic masculinity", what about correlation is not causation?
is...
It is interesting to see that article in the New York Magazine. It makes it clear that the author was merely reporting the term which was already in use, and that he was not the source of it.
It is of interest also to see the claim that susceptibility is inherited made with such confidence at...
On looking at historical cases it was recently brought home to me how the name is less important than the criteria. I intended to write about it elsewhere, when the head permits.
There is listed, in the cannon of epidemic outbreaks, one in a Southampton school in 1979 reported in 1980. The...
We need to get the name right. It appears to be Claire Regina Fox. Presumably in anticipation of the success of the revolution.
It is interesting to see that Wiki gives, as one of the funders of the Institute of Ideas, Novartis. Strange how the name keeps appearing. One day we will put it all...
He did indeed. What has yet to be established is whether these views were generalisations derived from personal antagonism to the views of Dr J Gordon Parish, or whether there was some wider evidence base on which the prejudice was founded.
It could be argued that this appointment, which may very well be the natural and correct one, has made life difficult for Cochrane.
Under the old regime it could have been said that changes have been made. We have reconsidered the matter in light of those changes and are now satisfied that...
I accept that it has uses provided that it is not implying (or, indeed, expressing) psychological causation. My point is that it is not taking the matter any further forward other than offering an alternative description of the symptoms.
Isn't part of the problem with "functional disorder" that it is not a diagnosis, but merely a different way of describing the symptoms.
Patient says "this doesn't seem to be working properly". Doctor says "Yes, it's what we specialists call a functional disorder".
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.