Aaron E. Carroll: Peer Review: The Worst Way to Judge Research, Except for All the Others One way to detect problems with research earlier would...
Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days Nature 561, 167-169 (2018) doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8...
Scientists in developed countries provide nearly three times as many peer reviews per paper submitted as researchers in emerging nations,...
This was an interesting read from representatives for the UK Wellcome Trust and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute about pros and cons concerning...
Evidence-based medicine is the cornerstone of clinical practice, but it is dependent on the quality of evidence upon which it is based....
Split from the twitter thread. Some discussion of the peer review of the PACE re-analysis article submitted to the BMJ starts from post #1745 of...
Preprints can help detect flaws that might otherwise escape the notice of a conventional peer review process The world moves at an...
Peer review is a cornerstone of the academic publication process but can be subject to the flaws of the humans who perform it. Evidence suggests...
Considers COI as they relate to peer review, I’ve noticed that junior scientists tend to be really picky about conflicts of interest, whereas...
" Thank you to our reviewers 2017 Thank you to our reviewers http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-reviewers The Editor would like to publicly...
An article discussing the problems with peer review, focusing particularly on the biomedical field, the effect of the pressure to publish to gain...
The puzzle: Why do scientists typically respond to legitimate scientific criticism in an angry, defensive, closed, non-scientific way? The answer:...
When peer review is broken, so is science. That is why this week, three national scientific academies — the French Academy of Sciences, the German...
No recent news article on this but thought given all the recent 'new treatments' popping up and dodgy research papers it is worth discussion. I...
Separate names with a comma.
