Brain training that cured a real illness: first-person testimony about fully recovering from [ME/CFS] using the lightning process, 2026, Hartman et al

forestglip

Administrator
Staff member
Brain training that cured a real illness: first-person testimony about fully recovering from myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) using the lightning process

Hartman, Robert J.

Abstract
I was medically diagnosed with ME/CFS. After being ill for five years, I fully recovered by retraining my brain. By ‘brain training’, I mean roughly the repetition of mental exercises with bodily movements that function to rewire neural pathways to improve health.

In this article, I offer my first-person patient testimony about how I got sick, what it was like, my decision to try the Lightning Process, how I came to view the dysregulation involved in ME/CFS via the Lightning Process, and how I fully recovered from ME/CFS through its brain training.

I also reflect as a philosopher on why I was not to blame for being ill and address a skeptical social trend that would deny testimony like mine.

Web | DOI | PDF | Journal of Psychosomatic Research | Open Access
 
a skeptical social trend that would deny testimony like mine.​

A completely false assertion. Nobody is denying you recovered. What is being 'denied', and with very good reason, is that a single case using subjective self-report interpretation is not valid evidence for causality. Nor even a whole bunch of them.

This is Methodology 101 this guy is failing.

And philosophers wonder why they have a bad name among competent working scientists?
 
a skeptical social trend that would deny testimony like mine.​

A completely false assertion. Nobody is denying you recovered. What is being 'denied', and with very good reason, is that a single case using subjective self-report interpretation is not valid evidence for causality. Nor even a whole bunch of them.

This is Methodology 101 this guy is failing.

And philosophers wonder why they have a bad name among competent working scientists?
Lightning Process! Well of course you’re cured…!

They really get stuck in the persecution loop, don't they.

I guess if you’re that suggestible, it’s possible you really only had ME because you thought you did. Would explain how they all get cured from being told they’re cured.

Follow me for more unevidenced opinions plucked from thin air.
 
Co-occurring phenomena.

Not proof of causation.

He could walk 400 meters. Then he was able to walk farther. Et voila, he improved markedly and would have done so whether or not he imagined lively scenes, which was the retraining.

Fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc. After this therefore because of this.

You'd think as philosophy PhD he'd be capable of seeing the fallacy.
 
Co-occurring phenomena.

Not proof of causation.

He could walk 400 meters. Then he was able to walk farther. Et voila, he improved markedly and would have done so whether or not he imagined lively scenes, which was the retraining.

Fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc. After this therefore because of this.

You'd think as philosophy PhD he'd be capable of seeing the fallacy.
You’d think he’d see through the unfalsifiable “say you are cured because if you don’t you’re not” premise of LP
 
Brain Training

I read Phil Parker’s books, and I hired a Lightning Process coach to help me complete the training program over several days. By reading Parker’s An Introduction to the Lightning Process, I gained foundational insights about the dysfunction previously outlined and patient testimonies that helped me to commit to it. Most of the details about the training itself are in Parker’s Get the Life You Love, Now. Even so, my coach was crucial to my recovery. The cure is not found in knowledge but in repeated application of the knowledge to change the mind, brain, and body.

The Lightning Process has three main steps: awareness, interruption, and redirection [8](p. 25).

The first step is awareness. I needed to become aware of anything that was triggering or amplifying the physical emergency response. That is, I needed to become attuned to the thoughts, emotions, and actions (i) that were contributing to the ongoing physical emergency response and (ii) that I was “doing” in a passive way like biting a finger nail without realizing it. My coach introduced the term-of-art verb “dû” to signify a passive kind of “doing” in which I was involved without awareness or intention [9](p. 53).

One difficulty I had with this step was that I still found it hard to believe that I was dû-ing my symptoms. But believing it was also helpful for implementing the Lightning Process. How to proceed?
First, I reminded myself that it could be true for all I knew. Second, I recited supporting evidence: Sally recovered from ME/CFS via the Lightning Process. And research supports surprising connections between the mind, brain, and body: placebos, sugar pills that a person believes are medicine, are almost as effective as Prozac and painkillers at reducing depression and pain, respectively [6](pp. 28-39). Third, I remembered Blaise Pascal’s insight that when evidence is at an impasse, there can be good reasons to accept something as true for a practical benefit [10] (fragment 418, pp. 121-125). So, because reason could not tell me whether or not I was dû-ing my symptoms, I decided to act “as if” I were dû-ing them for a practical benefit.

The second step is interruption. Whenever I noticed that I was dû-ing tired or anxious, I needed to interrupt it. How? I would ask myself a series of questions, answer them, and compassionately coach myself; all the while, I’d move my body to track the different stages of the questions, answers, and coaching [9](pp. 107-159).

That process is a lot, and that’s the main point of it. After I’d completed all of that, I’d have interrupted dû-ing tired or anxious. It’s impossible to do all of those tasks while also dû-ing tired or anxious because the mind can perform only so many tasks simultaneously. And the more often dû-ing tired or anxious was interrupted and thereby failed to stimulate or amplify the physical emergency response, the weaker the neural connection between them became, and the fewer inroads there were to trigger or amplify the physical emergency response.

The third step is redirection. After interrupting dû-ing tired or anxious, I had to redirect my mind. I’d ask myself what I want to feel and be, and then I’d go and relive it by connecting with a vivid memory that exemplified those desires [9](pp. 161-198). I wanted to be energetic like my daughter, and I’d reconnect to a lively memory playing tennis, re-experiencing it as if I were there doing it.

Here’s the memory: I do my serve routine, feeling strength pulse through my muscles. I toss the ball up and arch my back, and then I snap my back and swing through the ball with great force, and I sprint up to the net. My opponent returns the serve, and then I hit it back with a forehand volley. But my opponent chases down my volley, and he returns it with a defensive lob, which prompts me to sprint back to the baseline. I run ahead of the ball, turn and jump to get height, and strike an aggressive forehand right past my opponent, who had charged the net while I was sprinting back to the baseline. In this memory, I feel exactly what it is like to be energetic, strong, and fast. That feeling activated neural pathways that improved physiology, and the repetition of activating those neural pathways, due to the plasticity of the brain, generated neural highways for more robust physiological improvements [8](p. 25).

This is the basic idea behind the Lightning Process. It is called the Lightning Process precisely because people can recover with lightning speed [6](pp. 124-135).
But I was more cautious than my coach recommended me to be. I gradually increased how much I walked per day, carefully keeping track of it on a spreadsheet. I started walking 400 meters twice per day, then three times, and then four times, and up to ten times a day by the end of the third week.

The beginning was the hardest. When I first did a 400-meter walk for the third time in one day, a feat that was previously guaranteed to trigger PEM, my heartbeat raced with anxiety and I felt tired; in fact, I was dû-ing anxiety and tiredness. After coming to that awareness, I interrupted it by using the process. I went through the series of questions, answers, and compassionate coaching, and then I redirected to that powerful memory playing tennis. As an additional help in the beginning, I also distracted myself by looking at my phone. The more it worked (and it always did!), the more confident and excited I became. In the fourth week, I started doing five 800-meter walks per day and up to ten of them per day within a few more weeks. Next, I repeated the approach with 1,200-meter walks, and then 1-mile walks. By the end of three months, I was doing three 3.5-mile walks a day. The point of this slow, methodical regimen was to prove to myself, beyond doubt, that I had recovered fully.

In the first few years after my recovery, I feared that ME/CFS would return after some new viral infection—especially when a virus sapped my energy for more than a week. In those times, I continued to use the Lightning Process, and ME/CFS hasn’t returned.
 
The recovery stories I've read all have this feature where the initial symptoms are quite devastating:
When I was suffering PEM, the fatigue was so intense that I could only lie down in bed; my muscles became extremely weak as if the force of gravity had greatly increased; the brain fog was so dense that it was hard to recall words, and I was unable to sustain a thought. This worst stage of PEM lasted for several days, but complete recovery—that is, recovery back to my regular capacities as a person with ME/CFS—required several weeks without additional onset of PEM. The severity of these symptoms makes it impossible to “push through” the fatigue.

And then by the time they try the LP the symptoms are already comparatively mild and easily surmountable with a few mental tricks:
When I first did a 400-meter walk for the third time in one day, a feat that was previously guaranteed to trigger PEM, my heartbeat raced with anxiety and I felt tired; in fact, I was dû-ing anxiety and tiredness. After coming to that awareness, I interrupted it by using the process. I went through the series of questions, answers, and compassionate coaching, and then I redirected to that powerful memory playing tennis. As an additional help in the beginning, I also distracted myself by looking at my phone. The more it worked (and it always did!), the more confident and excited I became.

I've had periods of remission, and the second quote is exactly the kind of mind game that can feel helpful when I'm on an upswing or already quite well. They do not help at all when I decline inexplicably back into illness. I suspect these ideas are going to look a bit silly someday when we understand more about what's actually driving the big shifts in illness level.
 
all the while, I’d move my body to track the different stages of the questions, answers, and coaching [9](pp. 107-159).

[9] is Get the Life You Love, Now: How to Use the Lightning Process® Toolkit for Happiness and Fulfilment

I got my hands on it and it's really exhausting to even just skim through.
Unfortunately, my version doesn't have a table of contents with page numbers.
This seems to be the gist, it's basically self-questionnaire tuning:



APPENDIX IV
Handy Reference of the Steps


1. Present

2. Spot the Pit

Quickly score yourself out of 10, where 10 is feeling good and zero is not feeling good.

3. Stop

Choose the appropriate one.

4. Choice

Ask, 'That way or this way?'

5. Coach

Acknowledge - check we have taken it in and re-score
Ask 'What do you want?' Answer and re-score.
Ask 'and how are you going to get it?'
Answer by either taking yourself back to a time when you felt that way and/or creating an action plan - re-score.

6. End

By recognizing you are now Present again and creating a life you love.

7. Reflection and Brain Rehearsal

Ask, 'What have I learned from this, that is really useful for my future?'


 
I've had periods of remission, and the second quote is exactly the kind of mind game that can feel helpful when I'm on an upswing or already quite well.
My illness tended to have a fluctuating course. There were periods of slow steady improvement, followed by an often abrupt worsening.

Before I understood that these fluctuations existed and that one had to be cautious about overinterpreting, in the steady improvement phase I would be hopeful and optimistic that I was maybe finally about to break free from the illness. I I would also be inclined to attribute improvement to whatever I had tried last. The overoptimism tended to feed overexertion which probably favored the subsequent relapse.

Eventually I became wiser, understood that I was just experiencing fluctuations, and was able to manage it better by working on acceptance and pacing.

The brain retraining testimonies often sound like people who are caught in a similar dynamic but don't understand it yet. If they experience recovery, as often happens in the first years, they may keep believing for the rest of their lives that they made the recovery happen through changing their thinking. If they relapse, we probably won't hear about that, especially not from the sources with a commercial interest in brain training.

It also occurred to me that these recovery stories are n=1 cases. A recovery isn't something that happens repeatedly, so the person doesn't have the opportunity to test again and again whether the positive thinking can reliably make a difference. That many such n=1 stories exist doesn't mean the claims are real, it may just mean that self-deception or misinterpretation are widespread.
 
Last edited:
Phil completed his PhD in the Psychology of Health at London Metropolitan University and is involved in research into a number of areas including the Lightning Process and Substance Use Disorders.
 
Article by @dave30th Tuller:


Parker has spent decades exploring alternative approaches to health. Years after he had developed the Lightning Process, he promoted an enterprise called the European College of Holistic Medicine Healing Course. According to a website archived in 2007, Parker and a colleague were co-leaders of the program, which included lessons on, among other topics, “how to contact your spirit/healing guides to help you create the right space for healing,” “the use of divination medicine cards and tarot as a way of making predictions,” and “the use of auras for diagnosis of a client’s problems.” Student healers would also learn how to prepare a location in advance “so that any energy polluting the room will not interfere with the work you are doing.”​
​
Parker’s biography on the archived website offered details on his provenance as a spiritual clinician. While working with his osteopathy patients, it noted, Parker “discovered that their bodies would suddenly tell him important bits of information about them and their past, which to his surprise turned out to be factually correct!” After that, “he further developed this ability to step into other people’s bodies… to assist them in their healing with amazing results.” In 2019, according to his LinkedIn profile, Parker completed a doctorate in psychology at London Metropolitan University.​



 
that I was “doing” in a passive way like biting a finger nail without realizing it. My coach introduced the term-of-art verb “dû” to signify a passive kind of “doing” in which I was involved without awareness or intention [9](p. 53).
There is a du-ing website linked to Phil Parker


Includes a short research page on The Lightening Process with such papers as the SMILE trial.


Part of the disclaimer (as at today's date) which sits on Phil Parkers website is as follows:


Disclaimer
All content is for educational purposes only. We do not intend for the content to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The LP is a training program designed to teach skills to improve health and is not a treatment that claims to provide a cure.

Testimonials from our patients and their family members reflect their personal experiences and outcomes. Testimonials do not guarantee, warrant, or predict your results as everyone is unique.
My emphasis

Given his past problems in the UK with the ASA, promoting recovery stories is a way of getting around the legal safeguards which exist.

A different example indicating why they may not be:

This is part of a 2022 ASA ruling against Google ads run by

ASA Ruling on Person(s) unknown t/a Good Health Today​



We considered that consumers would understand from the ads that the treatment that Good Health Today and Urhealth-Matters provided could treat depression, anxiety, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, viral fatigue, long COVID, irritable bowel syndrome, stress, trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, borderline personality disorder, seasonal affective disorder, bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, migraines, dementia, memory problems and eye problems. We therefore expected to see robust scientific evidence that related specifically to the treatment provided by Good Health Today and Urhealth-Matters, and which substantiated that it was a successful treatment for the listed conditions. Testimonials alone were not sufficient to substantiate the claims.

In the absence of such evidence, we concluded that the claims had not been substantiated and were therefore misleading.
 
This defence put forward by Good Health Today failed.

Person(s) unknown t/a Good Health Today and Urhealth-Matters said that getting clinical trial data to support advertising claims cost millions of pounds, and that there was no legal requirement for a complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioner to have such data. They said they invited consumers to try their treatment and to see if it helped. They did not give assurances or guarantees. They said they did not help with any health condition that was prohibited by the law for them to help with, and that consumers were free to choose any treatment they wished. They did not believe that the ASA had the legal authority to regulate their advertising.
Assessment
The ASA understood that both the Good Health Today and Urhealth-Matters websites offered the same treatment, and were operated by the same person(s).
 
Abstract said:
and address a skeptical social trend that would deny testimony like mine.
I don't deny your personal experience, Robert J Hartman. You are free to write it up as a personal anecdote and publish it as such. If the non scientists who edit the psychosomatic journal want to publish your anecdote as if it showed evidence of anything, more fool them. It illustrates nicely just how unserious they are about medical evidence.

I do deny that there is any science behind the claims that this is 'rewiring neural pathways' and that this is a cure for ME/CFS. Neither has any biomedical or clinical trial evidence to support it. This is not a 'skeptical social trend' it's hard science.
 
On the Du-ing page there is also a YouTube video by Phil Parker in it he claims that a person with 'chronic fatigue' and pictured with feeding tubes a mere 21 days later is pictured full of health dressed and jumping in the air.

Google owns YouTube.

Here are its relevant guidelines


YouTube also believes people should be able to share their own experiences, including personal experiences with vaccinations, for example. This means that we may make exceptions for content in which creators describe first-hand experiences from themselves or their family. At the same time, we recognise that there is a difference between sharing personal experiences and promoting misinformation. To address this balance, we will still remove content or channels if they include other policy violations or demonstrate a pattern of promoting medical misinformation.
 
Back
Top Bottom