Cochrane ME/CFS GET review temporarily withdrawn

Discussion in 'Psychosomatic news - ME/CFS and Long Covid' started by Trish, Oct 17, 2018.

  1. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,947
    Location:
    betwixt and between
  2. Forbin

    Forbin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,581
    Location:
    USA
    "Where does a wise man hide a leaf? In the forest. But what does he do if there is no forest? He grows a forest to hide it in." - GK Chesterton

    Of course, it doesn't always work. :)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4Tlob3U_1o


     
  3. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,064
    Location:
    Australia
    I am of the view that the 'temporary' withdrawal is basically the last warning to the review authors to get their act together and provide substantive responses and appropriate changes, or the review will be permanently withdrawn.

    This is closer to the end of a long process than to the start.

    If Tovey is genuinely trying to clean up Cochrane then he must give – and be clearly seen to give – the authors of dodgy review papers every possible opportunity to correct their papers first.

    It is how I would do it.

    It takes time, and seems overly generous and bureaucratic, but it covers the necessary bases as much as practically possible. Pulling a major, influential, and controversial review from the literature is no small thing, and you have to get it right, technically and politically.
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2018
  4. Joh

    Joh Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    943
    Location:
    Germany
  5. obeat

    obeat Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    698
  6. Joh

    Joh Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    943
    Location:
    Germany
  7. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,860
    Location:
    Australia
    All the minus SD stuff is bullshit because the general population distribution is highly skewed with a prominent ceiling effect. The should be comparing to a population percentile. For the general population with demographics similar to the people in the PACE trial, a SF36 PF score of 60 is somewhere around the 10th percentile.
     
  8. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,924
    Location:
    UK
    could someone screen save all these Clare Gerada tweets; they might disappear.
     
    MEMarge, Esther12, inox and 10 others like this.
  9. Solstice

    Solstice Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,216
    Some already did.
     
    rvallee, MEMarge, Esther12 and 9 others like this.
  10. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,947
    Location:
    betwixt and between
    Her reply to Keith Geraghty is screen saved.

    I also screen saved her first reply to Trish and her statements re accountability/ authority .

    Will post later.

    Edit: Here are the (only) ones I saved:
    Bildschirmfoto vom 2018-10-20 11-39-35.png Bildschirmfoto vom 2018-10-20 11-41-07.png Bildschirmfoto vom 2018-10-20 11-43-16.png Bildschirmfoto vom 2018-10-20 11-43-36.png

    Clare_G_to Keith_Geraghty.jpg

    Edit 2: Good to see that others are doing more professional screenshots.
    I already had missed this one now being reposted:

    https://twitter.com/user/status/1053612177272246273
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2018
  11. Lucibee

    Lucibee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,498
    Location:
    Mid-Wales
    Keep digging, Clare. Keep digging...

    cgerada_20oct2018.png
     
    Invisible Woman, Woolie, Andy and 9 others like this.
  12. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,420
    Of course one significant source of pressure on doctors might be when they give badly flawed advice to ME patients, in the sincere belief they are right and doing their best, when in fact they have themselves have been hoodwinked by the heavily influential flawed research. In some cases they might be considered victims of it as well. Doctors these days must be hugely too busy to follow all the research, and have to rely on the integrity of medical researchers, and to trust the system.
     
  13. Kalliope

    Kalliope Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,570
    Location:
    Norway
    Invisible Woman, Woolie, sea and 12 others like this.
  14. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,947
    Location:
    betwixt and between
    We know it is possible to be both patient and doctor, Clare. Some of us ME sufferers are doctors too.
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2018
    Invisible Woman, Woolie, sea and 18 others like this.
  15. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,064
    Location:
    Australia
  16. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    I feel sure that Dr Speight will be an interested observer of that.
     
  17. Lucibee

    Lucibee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,498
    Location:
    Mid-Wales
    Just to go back to the original topic: Have Cochrane issued any formal statement on this yet?
     
  18. Cinders66

    Cinders66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,229
    Kind of ironic that the lady tweeter is now off to join the general public on a march to apply pressure to the politicians to get their way on Brexit. Shouldn’t the public just sit quietly and accept whatever elected politicians decide or do about their future ? Think how difficult this is making if for politicians and how it would seem if they listened to the people or even bowed to public pressure and slightly changed course. It would be a disgrace.
     
  19. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    15,175
    Location:
    London, UK
    As far as I can see not. It seems the press release was not from them. The press release says Cochrane have taken the decision to withdraw, not that they have withdrawn.
     
    Invisible Woman, Andy, MeSci and 9 others like this.
  20. Hoopoe

    Hoopoe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,426
    If you're on good terms with Cochrane, maybe it's time to suggest that they release their own statement that makes it very clear that the review is being withdrawn in reponse to high quality critique. It would be an opportunity for Cochrane to restore some trust and create a more positive relationship with patients.
     

Share This Page