Closed Complementary Self-help Strategies for Patients With Post-COVID-19 Syndrome (NASH-POCO), 2026, Haller, Kleinschnitz et al.

Chandelier

Senior Member (Voting Rights)

Complementary Self-help Strategies for Patients With Post-COVID-19 Syndrome (NASH-POCO)
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05798221

Brief Summary
Individuals affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection may subsequently be affected by the so-called post-COVID syndrome.
The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of a multimodal 10-week group program consisting of self-help strategies based on complementary medicine approaches of TEM (Traditional European Medicine), TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine), and TIM (Traditional Indian Medicine) in addition to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual alone (no active study intervention/waiting list).
Endpoints of the study include subjective quantitative and qualitative as well as objective (physician-reported) variables.

Study Start (Actual)
2023-04-25
Primary Completion (Actual)
2025-03-25
Study Completion (Actual)
2025-10-06
Enrollment (Actual)
86

How is the study designed?
Design Details
Primary Purpose : Treatment
Allocation : Randomized
Interventional Model : Parallel Assignment
Masking : Double (InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmExperimental: Complementary self-help strategies in addition to treatment as usual
The experimental group consists of 10 weeks of group treatments with educative and actively practicing elements. The patients will also receive a booklet with self-help basics and descriptions of the techniques, which should facilitate the correct practice at home. Parallel treatment as usual is allowed.
Intervention/TreatmentBehavioral: Complementary self-help strategies in addition to treatment as usual
  • The 10-week group program consists of self-help strategies from complementary medicine approaches of TEM (Traditional European Medicine), TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine), and TIM (Traditional Indian Medicine) in addition to treatment as usual
Participant Group/ArmActive Comparator: Treatment as usual
The active control group consists a 16-week waiting period, where treatment as usual is allowed. In case of acute worsening/progression of the symptoms, consultations with the study physician are offered anytime. After the waiting period, the control group will be offered the same units as in the experimental group.
Intervention/TreatmentOther: Treatment as usual
  • The active control group consists a 16-week waiting period, where treatment as usual is allowed. In case of acute worsening/progression of the symptoms, consultations with the study physician are offered anytime. After the waiting period, the control group will be offered the same units as in the experimental group.

What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures

Post-COVID-19 symptom burdenSomatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8): self-report scale from 0 to 32 points with higher scores indicating higher level of burdenWeek 16
Secondary Outcome Measures

Post-COVID-19 symptom burdenSomatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8): self-report scale from 0 to 32 points with higher scores indicating higher level of burdenWeek 10
Post-COVID-19 functional status (self-reported)Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale - Patient Version (PCFS): self-report scale from 0 - 4 points with 0 = no functional limitations and 4 = severe functional limitationsWeek 10
Post-COVID-19 functional status (self-reported)Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale - Patient Version (PCFS): self-report scale from 0 - 4 points with 0 = no functional limitations and 4 = severe functional limitationsWeek 16
Health-related quality of lifeShort-form Health Survey (SF-12): self-report scale from 0 - 100 with higher score indicates a better health stateWeek 10
Health-related quality of lifeShort-form Health Survey (SF-12): self-report scale from 0 - 100 with higher score indicates a better health stateWeek 16
FatigueChalder fatigue-scale (CFS): self-report scale from 0 - 33 points with higher scores indicating higher level of physical and mental fatigueWeek 10
FatigueChalder fatigue-scale (CFS): self-report scale from 0 - 33 points with higher scores indicating higher level of physical and mental fatigueWeek 16
Anxiety and depressionHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): self-report scale form 0 - 42 with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety and depressionWeek 10
Anxiety and depressionHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): self-report scale form 0 - 42 with higher scores indicating higher level of anxiety and depressionWeek 16
InsomniaInsomnia Severity Index (ISI): self-report scale from 0 - 28 points with higher score indicating higher level of insomniaWeek 16
InsomniaInsomnia Severity Index (ISI): self-report scale from 0 - 28 points with higher score indicating higher level of insomniaWeek 10
Cardiovascular performance6-Minute-Walking-Test (6MWT): a longer traveled distance indicates a higher level of cardiovascular/pulmonary capacityWeek 10
Cardiovascular performance6-Minute-Walking-Test (6MWT): a longer traveled distance indicates a higher level of cardiovascular/pulmonary capacityWeek 16
Pulmonary performanceBorg Breathlessness Scale (Borg-CR10-Scale): scale from 0-10 with higher scores indicating higher breathlessness/dyspnea - assesed subsequent to the 6-Minute-Walking-TestWeek 10
Pulmonary performanceBorg Breathlessness Scale (Borg-CR10-Scale): scale from 0-10 with higher scores indicating higher breathlessness/dyspnea - assesed subsequent to the 6-Minute-Walking-TestWeek 16
Post-COVID-19 functional status (physician-reported)Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale - Physician Version (PCFS): physician-report scale from 0 - 4 points with 0 = no functional limitations and 4 = severe functional limitationsWeek 10
Post-COVID-19 functional status (physician-reported)Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale - Physician Version (PCFS): physician-report scale from 0 - 4 points with 0 = no functional limitations and 4 = severe functional limitationsWeek 16
Adverse eventsAll adverse events in relation and unrelated to the interventionWeeks 0 - 10
Other Outcome Measures

Treatment ExpectationTreatment Credibility Scale (TCS): expectation about the treatment effectiveness measured from 0 = no effectiveness to 10 = highest possible effectivenessWeek 0
Self-efficacyArthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES): the scale ranges from 1 to 10 with higher scores indicating more perceived efficacyWeek 10
Self-efficacyArthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES): the scale ranges from 1 to 10 with higher scores indicating more perceived efficacyWeek 16
StressPerceived Stress Scale (PSS): 10-item scale, summed to create a psychological stress score of maximal 40 points with higher scores indicating greater psychological stressWeek 10
StressPerceived Stress Scale (PSS): 10-item scale, summed to create a psychological stress score of maximal 40 points with higher scores indicating greater psychological stressWeek 16
FlourishingFlourishing-Scale (FS): the scale ranges from 8 (lowest possible value) to 56 (highest possible value) with higher values correspond to a person with many psychological resources and strengthsWeek 10
FlourishingFlourishing-Scale (FS): the scale ranges from 8 (lowest possible value) to 56 (highest possible value) with higher values correspond to a person with many psychological resources and strengthsWeek 16
LonelinessUCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS): the short form of the UCLA-LS constsis of 12 items, ranges from 0 to 36 points, with higher higher scores indicating greater lonelinessWeek 10
LonelinessUCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS): the short form of the UCLA-LS constsis of 12 items, ranges from 0 to 36 points, with higher higher scores indicating greater lonelinessWeek 16
 
Google Translate link.

I was left a bit confused by an article in the German Apotheken Umschau.
They would start with ME/CFS as a terrible chronic illness and then pivot to traditional remedies and rehabilitation successes in LC.
I tried to find the study by Heidemarie Haller but then realized that it hasn’t been published yet, although
Study Completion (Actual)
2025-10-06
Since she’s been presented as an expert on Long Covid, I‘d expect to see her again in more articles on the topic.
Haller‘s scientific track record shows all the Somatoform disorders and medically unexplained symptoms topics you‘d expect:
Yoga for heart disease
Accupuncture for cancer survivors
Mind-Body during chemotherapy


Machine translation from the article
A new way of relating to the body and a life with less stress—some people with Long COVID report that these changes have helped them.
Dr. Heidemarie Haller, a psychologist and Head of Research at the Center for Integrative Medicine and Planetary Health at Essen University Hospital, can confirm this.
In a study, she and her team investigated an approach consisting of several components: relaxation techniques, breathing exercises, mindful movement, pacing, an anti-inflammatory diet, and hydrotherapy.
"Essentially, the aim is to stimulate the body's self-healing capacities," the psychologist says.
One example is Kneipp cold-water therapy, which, in her experience, is a particularly suitable method for training the cardiovascular and immune systems: "Thebody is best able to repair itself when it is not under chronic stress."

In the study program, participants learn that every illness involves more than just physical causes.
Psychological factors and socialrelationships also play a role.
There is growing evidence that this is particularly true for Long COVID.
At the same time, this perspective has drawn criticism, including from peopleaffected by the condition.
As studies have shown, some feel that their illness is being"psychologized."
Haller, however, emphasizes: "Regardless of the illness, it is always possible to strengthen health."
One important pathway is through the mind, which is itself part of the body.
Then I noticed that Professor Kleinschnitz is listed as Study Director.
I‘m not sure how much influence this position has but the study surely represents his arrogant views on PAIS, as discussed previously on S4ME:
 
Last edited:
I don’t think they understand what «objective» means. The only «objective» measurement is the 6MWT, and that’s a pretty bad proxy for overall health
Not entirely related, but once I was sent to the ER because my O2 levels were dropping dramatically when I stood up, which was observed both by me at home with my pulse ox and my Dr. in her Office (who wrote basically that I looked like death)….

In the ER doc reported that I looked well appeared anxious, and reported subjective drops in O2 saturation.

How does one have a subjective drop in O2 saturation?! I suppose he thought that subjective meant reported by the patient (or GP) and objective meant… reported by him?!
 
The 3rd World Congress on Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine from October 2025 provides a first-results abstract.


Title​

Effectiveness of a mind-body medicine self-care intervention for post-COVID-19 syndrome: first results of the NASH randomized controlled trial

Introduction​

Patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome frequently face challenges in obtaining effective treatment for symptoms following the acute SARS-CoV-2 infection due to the multi-factorial and often unclear pathophysiology.
Against this background, integrating salutogenic strategies – which emphasize health literacy and self-regulation – alongside symptomatic treatment may provide additional therapeutic value.
We therefore developed and tested a mind-body medicine group program for its effectiveness and safety.

Methods​

We conducted a randomized controlled trial (NCT05798221) including 86 patients (77.9% female; mean age 50.8 ± 13.0 years) who reported post-COVID-19 symptoms for an average of 20.0 ± 9.8 months, following 1.5 ± 0.7 SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 10-week interdisciplinary group intervention (NASH) plus treatment as usual (TAU), or TAU alone.
The NASH program was based on the principles of mind-body medicine, Traditional European Medicine, and ear acupuncture. It included weekly six-hour sessions combining interdisciplinary group consultations, health education, and guided exercises in physical activity, relaxation, breathing techniques, nutrition, and complementary self-care.
The primary outcome was post-COVID-19 symptom severity, assessed by the Somatic Symptom Scale (SSS) at 16 weeks.
Further secondary outcomes were assessed at both week 10 and week 16.
Statistical analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis using analyses of covariance, adjusting for baseline values and participants’ treatment expectations.
Results are presented as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results and Discussion​

ITT analyses revealed significant between-group differences on post-COVID-19 symptom severity at week 10 (-3.61 SSS, 95%CI=-5.47|-1.75, p < .001) as well as at week 16 (-3.00 SSS, 95%CI=-4.64|-1.35, p < .001).
Further analyses will reveal possible effects on secondary outcomes.
Adverse events were mild and transient, including occasional dizziness, skin irritation, circulatory discomfort, and headaches related to specific NASH techniques (e.g. breathing exercises, mustard flour, acupuncture, and cupping).
Participation in the NASH intervention was not associated with serious adverse events.

Conclusions​

NASH significantly reduced post-COVID-19 symptom severity compared to TAU, with effects sustained over 16 weeks.
The intervention was well tolerated, with only minor adverse events reported.
The findings underscore the potential of integrating salutogenic strategies into the treatment of individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Keywords​

Mind-Body-Medicine; Post-COVID-19; Traditional European Medicine; acupuncture; Self-Care

Area​

INTEGRATION OF TRADITIONAL AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE INTO THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM - from primary health care to hospitals

Category​

Clinical Trials

Authors​

Heidemarie Haller, Thuy Thi Nhi Cao, Christiane Pithan, Thomas Rampp, Jessica Wittek, Anna Paul, Mark Stettner, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Gustav Dobos



Moreover, there are 2 case reports from the study provided on a funder‘s website:

Case Reports​

The following are two representative case reports documented by the study physician:

Patient A​

The patient, who had previously been athletic and highly capable (having walked 1,000 km across Germany), had more or less lost herindependent way of life as a result of the illness and its associated symptoms.
At the beginning of the study, she suffered from severe headaches, word-finding difficulties, emotional dysregulation (frequent crying), sensory overload, and markedly reduced functional capacity.
She had also been unable to recover fully from anintervening episode of "influenza-like illness."

During the study intervention, she discovered the benefits of beeswax compresses, aromatherapy, Kneipp therapy ("Kneipp is my friend!"), eye massage, acupressure, yogic alternate nostril breathing, body awareness, practicing consciouskindness toward herself and others, and pacing.
By the end of the intervention, her cognitiveimpairments had improved substantially, as had her physical limitations.

Study Physician's Report

From the interim report of our funded research project
Nature-Based Self-Help for Patients with Post-COVID Syndrome (NaShPoCo)

Patient D​

The patient presented with profound fatigue andsevere cognitive impairment, including marked deficits in memory and information retention.
An episode of herpes zoster (shingles) had furtherexacerbated her condition.
One of her goals was to cope better with setbacks, accompanied by the wish that the "fog" surrounding her mind would clear.

By the end of the intervention, the patient had learned to manage her energy effectively, enabling her to get through the working day successfully.
She benefited from aromatherapy, Kneipp applications, breathing exercises, and mindfulness practices integrated into daily life.
Using the pacing approach, she has now regained approximately 70–90% of her functional capacity.

Study Physician's Report

From the interim report of our funded research project
Nature-Based Self-Help for Patients with Post-COVID Syndrome (NaShPoCo)



To summarize, the Apotheken Umschau, a health and pharmacy information magazine that reaches approximately 15 million readers, is presenting main author Heidemarie Haller as an expert on Long Covid in their article.
The article mentions her study as if it was published and peer-reviewed:
In a study, she and her team investigated an approach made up of multiple modules.
In the study program, participants learn that every illness involves more than just physical causes.
Psychological factors and social relationships also play a role.
There is growing evidence that this is particularly true for Long COVID.
Yet, in reality, only a preliminary abstract for the study has been presented at a 3rd world congress for TIM 9 months ago.
 
mind-body medicine, Traditional European Medicine, and ear acupuncture
group consultations, health education, and guided exercises in physical activity, relaxation, breathing techniques, nutrition, and complementary self-care
breathing exercises, mustard flour, acupuncture, and cupping
beeswax compresses, aromatherapy, Kneipp therapy ("Kneipp is my friend!"), eye massage, acupressure, yogic alternate nostril breathing, body awareness, practicing consciouskindness toward herself and others, and pacing
aromatherapy, Kneipp applications, breathing exercises, and mindfulness practices
At least the original snake oil had active ingredients such as alcohol, heroine, morphine and cocaine. This is more like Simpson and Son Revitalizing Tonic.
 
At least the original snake oil had active ingredients such as alcohol, heroine, morphine and cocaine. This is more like Simpson and Son Revitalizing Tonic.
I suspect that this is a new strategy by Kleinschnitz: publish esoteric trash on Long Covid to show that it’s all just hysterical women who get better thanks to attention and some aroma therapy magic.
This study was registered in April 2023.
Another similar study was registered back in January 2023:

It’s remarkable how Kleinschnitz and his buddies from the German Neurological Association are able to keep ME/CFS in the psychosomatic lala-land while both the German psychologists and psychiatrists associations advanced their views.
See this post for more details:

It’s also interesting to note which studies on LC are analysed on their website:
 
I suspect that this is a new strategy by Kleinschnitz: publish esoteric trash on Long Covid to show that it’s all just hysterical women who get better thanks to attention and some aroma therapy magic.
This study was registered in April 2023.
Another similar study was registered back in January 2023:
Ironically, all they are showing is how useless the entire assessment framework of evidence-based medicine is that you can throw a bunch of useless alternative medicine and still get reports of benefits, and manage to actually publish those. It's possible that everyone knows it's all BS, doing something foolish while knowing that it's foolish is actually worse.

Then they will sincerely whine and rant about how people don't trust experts anymore, entirely oblivious to the fact that doing this in health care is the worst damn idea, because unlike all other expert disciplines, humans have a very significant and personal experience living in our bodies, totally unlike any other expert discipline.
 
Back
Top Bottom