(Daily Telegraph) “How I became a target for the ME militants” by Dr Michael Fitzpatrick

Dolphin

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
paywalled
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/doctors-diary/became-target-militants/


How I became a target for the ME militants

The current row over Nice guidelines on chronic fatigue syndrome is strikingly similar to the one I found myself caught up in 20 years ago

DR MICHAEL FITZPATRICK26 September 2021 • 5:10pm
It is nearly 20 years since I became inadvertently involved in the ‘ME wars’, the long-running conflict between campaigners suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome and the leading doctors in the field. Hostilities have erupted again during the summer as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) suspended publication of a revised edition of its guidelines on managing the condition, amid a spate of resignations from the guidelines committee and recriminations in the press....
 
similar to the one I found myself caught up in 20 years ago
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick 26 September 2021 • 5:10pm


It is nearly 20 years since I became inadvertently involved in the ‘ME wars’, the long-running conflict between campaigners suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome and the leading doctors in the field. Hostilities have erupted again during the summer as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) suspended publication of a revised edition of its guidelines on managing the condition, amid a spate of resignations from the guidelines committee and recriminations in the press.

More than 250,000 people in Britain are estimated to have chronic fatigue, characterised by extreme tiredness and generally feeling unwell.

Back in 2002 the chief medical officer Liam Donaldson endorsed a report approving the compromise diagnostic label of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. This contentious label emerged following the resignation from the official committee of four leading clinicians who advocated a biopsychosocial perspective, rather than the narrowly biomedical approach favoured by ME activists.

As a GP struggling at the time with several patients suffering from chronic fatigue, I wrote an op-ed in the British Journal of General Practice entitled ‘The Dangers of Cartesian Dualism’. I observed that ‘in their dismissal of psychology and their fixation on the minutiae of immunology, the ME organisations endorse the dualism of mind and body from which modern medicine has been gradually emerging over the past 300 years.’ I was concerned that by dogmatically repudiating any recognition of the role of psychological factors in the genesis and treatment of physical symptoms, ME advocates implicitly endorsed the stigmatisation of mental illness. I argued that ‘when they claim that ME is a genuine and real illness, they imply that symptoms for which no organic cause can be found are therefore false, fraudulent or imaginary.’ I was also concerned that they rejected psychological or physical therapies from which I had found many patients benefited.

The current dispute follows strikingly similar lines. A coalition of ME campaigns led by the Countess of Mar, a figure I believe to be preposterous and who attributes her own symptoms of chronic fatigue to organophosphates in sheep dip, enthusiastically support the proposal in the new Nice draft guidelines to withdraw approval for graded exercise therapy. Though this has become the most widely used intervention in chronic fatigue syndrome, the new draft claims a ‘lack of evidence for effectiveness’. This leaves many sufferers from chronic fatigue, now including many with long Covid, without any prospect of improvement.

Patients with chronic fatigue may have been badly treated by the medical establishment in the past, but they have also been ill-served by the ME campaigns. The very scientists and clinicians who have devoted their energies to researching and treating patients have been subjected to personal and professional intimidation through vexatious litigation and excessive use of freedom of information requests, with the result that some have abandoned the field. Given the difficulties that have attended the protracted process of trying to achieve a consensus around the new guidelines, an early resolution seems unlikely.

One consequence of my single article on ME/chronic fatigue syndrome in 2002 was that I became a target of vilification by ME activists. One devoted an entire chapter of a book on the subject to scurrilous abuse, scornfully labelling me – among others – as a ‘Wessely lieutenant’. At the time I did not know Simon Wessely, then a pioneering researcher in this area and, as such, a bête noire to the ME campaigners, but I have subsequently been disappointed to discover that neither pension nor campaign medals are available.

In his recent book, Head First: A Psychiatrist’s Stories of Mind and Body, Alastair Santhouse, a former colleague of Wessely’s at the Maudsley Hospital, describes him as ‘an extraordinary man, a genius’, who resembles a combination of Art Garfunkel and John McEnroe. After a long and distinguished service in the ME wars, Wessely, now both a professor and a knight of the realm, has retreated from this field but continues to play a prominent role in the medical world, currently presenting the Royal Society of Medicine’s regular Covid podcasts.
 
Is 3 a spate now?

So I could have a spate of digestive biscuits, and it be understood?

and yes, tosh.

Didn't there used to be severe penalties for calling a Countess 'preposterous', let alone in print in a national rag, were people outside the room may see it?

Possibly promotion sideways, to court jester, forced to wear a preposterous hat, and wave a preposterous stick??
 
Last edited:
Honestly there are no words for this kind of offensive hubris, this is pure ignorant bigotry and incompetence. This is someone utterly incapable of understanding that other people have a different perspective and life experience than their own, makes everything about him even when it doesn't concern him at all. We're just street litter to this guy. Someone critized him accurately decades ago and that's just unacceptable.

And the substance of being a target? Someone wrote things criticizing what he says. That's all it ever is, not content with destroying our lives, they want to to keep us in oppressed silence, will put imaginary discomfort above millions of lives.

Honestly a big FU to the Telegraph for publishing this ignorant narcissistic tripe, especially by someone making everything about themselves and for which the only reaction is: who even is this dude? Because everything they say is projection, so when they say that ME means "me me me!", they are of course projecting because to them it's all about their little selves.
 
I think it may be quite useful for this sort of disinformation to come out in a national newspaper just now. The people at NICE involved with the new guideline are likely to redouble their commitment to sticking to their guns.

Having spent four years working with Adam, Sally, Saran, and Charles I should think Peter Barry and Ilora Finlay would find this sort of nonsense deeply insulting.
 
2002 (following publication of the CMO Working Group on CFS/ME):

The making of a new disease
Michael Fitzpatrick on why the medical profession's latest ruling on ME (or chronic fatigue syndrome) is nothing short of disastrous

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2002/feb/07/medicalscience.healthandwellbeing

"Because some patients complained of flu-like symptoms, the term "post-viral fatigue syndrome" was also used."

no, it was because people got the illness post-viral infection.

"This is an edited version of an article first published on spiked"......not surprised
 
Mike Fitzpatrick, like his brother John, was a leading member of the RCP. He frequently contributed to its monthly review Living Marxism under the alias Mike Freeman. Living Marxism later became LM, in which Fitzpatrick had a regular column.

Fitzpatrick has also contributed regularly to Spiked and has spoken at events organised by both Spiked and the Institute of Ideas (IoI), such as its Genes & Society Festival, organised in association with Pfizer. Spiked and IoI both developed out of LM.
https://www.lobbywatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=142
The IoI was launched in the summer of 2000 by Claire Fox, the sister of Fiona Fox, the director of the Science Media Centre.
No big surprise here, the connection between him, the Foxes and the SMC. Birds of a feather.
 
https://www.lobbywatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=142

The IoI was launched in the summer of 2000 by Claire Fox, the sister of Fiona Fox, the director of the Science Media Centre.

No big surprise here, the connection between him, the Foxes and the SMC. Birds of a feather.


Dame Clare Gerada has given talks at the IoI and is a pal of Clare Fox.


https://www.theguardian.com/education/2003/dec/09/highereducation.uk2

Invasion of the entryists
George Monbiot

9 December 2003

Living Marxism, Frank Furedi, Spiked, Fox, IoI, Sense about Science, Science Media Centre et al...
 
By strange coincidence the Sunday Telegraph pre pandemic circulation numbers were exactly the same as the top figure for UK ME/CFS prevalence. We don't know how many STel's are actually sold now because its owners pulled out of the scheme that has measured newspaper sales for the last half century - something to do with STel's sales decline by 500% since 2104. For non UKer's not familiar with the paper it has long been know as the Sunday Torygraph for its rabidly right wing articles and preposterously anachronistic perspective.
 
Mike Fitzpatrick, like his brother John, was a leading member of the RCP. He frequently contributed to its monthly review Living Marxism under the alias Mike Freeman. Living Marxism later became LM, in which Fitzpatrick had a regular column.

No big surprise here, the connection between him, the Foxes and the SMC. Birds of a feather.

It is interesting that the former RCP (revolutionary communist party) members seem to have very similar views to those being expressed by the other RCP (royal college of physicians) at least when it comes to ME.

Also worth noting that Fitzpatrick is still a trustee of Sense about science -https://senseaboutscience.org/who-we-are/board-of-trustees/. At one point they seemed to be denying that they heavily backed PACE and instead referred to articles from the US SAS. But perhaps they are giving their normal backing for bad science carried out by the BPS believers.
 
I think it may be quite useful for this sort of disinformation to come out in a national newspaper just now. The people at NICE involved with the new guideline are likely to redouble their commitment to sticking to their guns.

Having spent four years working with Adam, Sally, Saran, and Charles I should think Peter Barry and Ilora Finlay would find this sort of nonsense deeply insulting.

I think it says something that they feel the need to roll out such stories at this time. Given his links to the RCP, SAS I would assume this is part of a campaign to try to discredit patients (or generally non-believers). I guess it has worked for them very successfully before,
 
Ah, Sense about Science, who are still very confused about science. And Spiked. So no doubt just putting in a favor to his mate Wessely to influence NICE. The old boys' club clubs along, doesn't care that it's clubbing sick people, in fact seems to enjoy it.

Are SAS still in the business of attacking patient populations for fun? Certainly one of their trustees is.
 
I think it says something that they feel the need to roll out such stories at this time. Given his links to the RCP, SAS I would assume this is part of a campaign to try to discredit patients (or generally non-believers). I guess it has worked for them very successfully before,
It really has, so much that the author listed all the success this gave Wessely at the end of the article. It was very successful for them. At our expense, but they got more than they could have hoped for on their own merit, and that's just success to some people.

Same thing for Horton and the whole "well, Lancet hasn't retracted PACE so it's still good". His responsibility in the Wakefield MMR paper is somehow always glossed over, he's still showered in unearned awards. When failure is rewarded as success, you certainly end up with a whole lot of glitzy failure.
 
Back
Top Bottom