If immune tolerance is at play, odds are nothing would.I had all the PCR/DNA lymphocyte tests for viruses 11 years into the illness when I felt 'viral' and nothing showed up.
If immune tolerance is at play, odds are nothing would.I had all the PCR/DNA lymphocyte tests for viruses 11 years into the illness when I felt 'viral' and nothing showed up.
If immune tolerance is at play, odds are nothing would.
Back in the early 1950's the Nobel Prize went to a couple of guys who demonstrated that a fetus can inherit from its mother an immunological unresponsiveness toward an antigen or group of antigens.Sorry, what does this mean?
So - in theory - you could have active infections and not test positive for them.
You have to know where to look, and what you're looking for.But doesn't this imply that while you might not be able to test for antibodies, or some other aspect of the body's response, you should be able test for the virus directly with PCR, maybe even more easily, since it's not being suppressed?
"not on his list" surely a completely unknow genetic fingerprint/organism would stick out like a sore thumb?pathogens may be sequestered, or not on his list
immune tolerance can be looked at as a state where there is little to no inflammation or antibody response to certain antigens that might typically cause such responses. It happens when elements of the immune system are effectively muted or suppressed.
Interesting. Don't know how widespread such experiences are; it's something I've never heard of till now. Such rapid fatigue could be secondary rather than directly from infection. In fact, it could be a true PEM rather than a fatigue from the infection. He could have developed post-viral syndrome while he was still in-viral and whatever exertion he did may have triggered PEM. It would be interesting to follow up on him and see if he still has the same fatigue episode after the virus was gone. On the face, however, it opens up the possibility of viral reactivation causing rapid PEM-like fatigue.Not instant, but this person on Reddit says after testing positive for COVID 1.5 days earlier, they went from a little sleepy to very sick in one hour, though no mention of fatigue as one of the after symptoms.
This person got intense fatigue and fever within an hour, after three days of muscle aches.
Doesn't viral persistence offer a pretty good explanation for delayed PEM? Exertion and repair from that exertion take energy away from the immune system [Edit: "energy stealing" doesn't have to be the reason, could be some other unknown mechanism where exertion allows a virus to proliferate. Maybe even a mechanism that is specific to ME.], so the virus gets a chance to break out of containment and build up its levels. Replication can take a few days, as can be seen with normal acute infections.
There have been multiple studies showing RNA of SARS-CoV-2 months or years after infection in LC, but as far as I know, no evidence of the actual virus, though. But maybe it's not viral persistence of the COVID virus, but instead the proposed reactivation of other viruses, like EBV. Though it'd be much more satisfyingly simple if it was just COVID persistence that we haven't found yet.
Doesn't viral persistence offer a pretty good explanation for delayed PEM? Exertion and repair from that exertion take energy away from the immune system [Edit: "energy stealing" doesn't have to be the reason, could be some other unknown mechanism where exertion allows a virus to proliferate. Maybe even a mechanism that is specific to ME.], so the virus gets a chance to break out of containment and build up its levels. Replication can take a few days, as can be seen with normal acute infections.
There have been multiple studies showing RNA of SARS-CoV-2 months or years after infection in LC, but as far as I know, no evidence of the actual virus, though. But maybe it's not viral persistence of the COVID virus, but instead the proposed reactivation of other viruses, like EBV. Though it'd be much more satisfyingly simple if it was just COVID persistence that we haven't found yet.
There seems to be pretty good negative evidence for persistence of any initiating microbe in ME/CFS. Also there is no good evidence for reactivation of specific viruses like EBV. I think it is possible that there is reactivation of immune responses to viruses or bacteria that we have raging around all the time.
I don't think you can take energy away from the immune system in any meaningful sense. If anything repair signals would activate cells.
In this way, the organism can withdraw considerable amounts of energy used otherwise by the brain and the skeletal muscle. The saved energy can instead be used for heat generation in the febrile state and for the inflammatory response.
Both anorexia and a possible reduction in drinking water relate to the notion that an animal that does not feel hungry or thirsty has little motivation to move about in search of food and water. If an animal stays in one spot, it engages in much less muscular activity and thus can save on body energy reserves needed for the increased metabolic costs of fever.
I had multiple PCR tests done during a period when I felt 'viral'. Nothing was detected. My lymphocytes were well below reference range- CD8 at the lowest. The virologist was only concerned about my very low CD8 count, not reactivating or viral persistence.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA or protein has been identified in tissue months after initial illness despite negative results via standard nasopharyngeal PCR testing and/or a lack of detection in peripheral blood from the same individual31,33. These observations suggest that SARS-CoV-2 persistence occurs largely in tissues.
Subsequently, the abnormal immune profile post-acute infection may allow for continuous reactivation and incomplete clearance of pathogens, resulting in tissue damage and an overactive yet ineffective immune response leading to inflammation and autoimmune changes. The absence of strong viremia indicates that the viruses that are present are likely quite tissue-specific, and data suggests that the viral activity consists of greater “latency-associated replication”, as was noted for EBV [72].
The thinking by me, and organizations like Polybio, is that it'll be a lot harder than a simple blood PCR to find a virus.
Possibly. Wouldn't the length of time after viral onset be a factor? I had all the PCR testing done 10yrs after ME onset.
The virus, if it persists, doesn't necessarily just persist obviously in blood. So if you go to the doctor and they draw some blood, even if they look for it with like the tools in the clinic, they're not going to find it. Like it's not going to be there free floating in blood, because that's just it's a dumb thing for viruses to do, like if you're gonna if you're gonna hide out someone being in the blood is where the immune system is most robust and all the immune cells are going to. So instead of free floating often in fluids like blood, the virus will go hide in simple terms in tissue. So for example like the tissue lining the guts or the tissue of the lungs or potentially right like nerve tissue even. So to find it then we have to design studies and this is what we have been doing where we collect tissue samples from patients with long covid via a biopsy procedure...
I'm seeing multiple papers suggesting that the heavy energy demand of the immune system is one of the main features of sickness