Jonathan Edwards
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Trish suggested starting a thread based on this post from me:
But I think we my have to consider the possibility that people who are so ill they cannot feed themselves do not just have the process we think will be the basis of ME/CFS, but have another process as well. Which means that treating their immobility as 'a feature of ME/CFS' may not be helpful.
This is not so easy to explain but there are other situations where one disease can be associated with an extra form of pathology if there is another causal factor involved. One example is Kaplan's syndrome - lung nodulosis - which occurs only in people with RA who also have pneumosilicosis. For very severe ME/CFS there might be a separate risk gene involved. Where ME/CFS has risk genes CA10, OLFM4 and BTN2A1, maybe if you also have a variant of XYZ456 your ME/CS may be complicated by immobility. There are subsets of Parkinson's that are familial and have different features, I believe.
So rather than either sort of shaman's folklore that at present people argue over we need some serious clinical science.
But I think we my have to consider the possibility that people who are so ill they cannot feed themselves do not just have the process we think will be the basis of ME/CFS, but have another process as well. Which means that treating their immobility as 'a feature of ME/CFS' may not be helpful.
This is not so easy to explain but there are other situations where one disease can be associated with an extra form of pathology if there is another causal factor involved. One example is Kaplan's syndrome - lung nodulosis - which occurs only in people with RA who also have pneumosilicosis. For very severe ME/CFS there might be a separate risk gene involved. Where ME/CFS has risk genes CA10, OLFM4 and BTN2A1, maybe if you also have a variant of XYZ456 your ME/CS may be complicated by immobility. There are subsets of Parkinson's that are familial and have different features, I believe.
So rather than either sort of shaman's folklore that at present people argue over we need some serious clinical science.