Review Exercise effectiveness on fatigue in Long-COVID: systematic review and meta-analysis, 2026, Chen et al

forestglip

Administrator
Staff member
Exercise effectiveness on fatigue in Long-COVID: systematic review and meta-analysis

Chen, Yi-Chun; Yang, Hui-Ting; Wu, Chu-Fang; Kuo, Chia-Chi

Background
Patients with Long COVID commonly experience fatigue-related distress, often leading to low energy, reduced activity endurance, and exertional dyspnea, all of which negatively impact quality of life. Although studies have increasingly explored the effects of exercise on Long COVID-related fatigue, a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence is lacking.

Purpose
To examine the effectiveness of exercise in improving fatigue among patients with Long COVID through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Airiti Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, ProQuest, and Index of the Taiwan Periodical Literature System databases were searched before July 2025. Two reviewers used the JBI randomized controlled trial checklist to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Extracted data were entered and analyzed using RevMan 5.4 software. Inverse variance and Mantel-Haenzel random effect model was used to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were performed.

Results
Fourteen randomized controlled trials were reviewed. Meta-analysis reveals that the exercise training group significantly improved fatigue severity (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.59, P = .002) and dyspnea severity (SMD = −0.89, P = .005) compared to the usual care group. Improvements were also observed in muscle strength and endurance.

Conclusions
Exercise training may help reduce physiological and psychological fatigue in patients with Long COVID. The available evidence suggests that individualized single-modality and multimodal exercise programs may be beneficial for patients experiencing fatigue symptoms. The included interventions generally consisted of 30-60 min sessions, performed 3-6 times per week over at least 8-12 weeks.

However, given the moderate-to-very-low certainty of the evidence, exercise programs should be individualized based on patient response and tolerance. Particular attention should be paid to preventing postexertional malaise, with the goal of reducing fatigue and supporting the recovery of daily functioning in patients with Long COVID.

Trial Registration
PROSPERO: CRD420251113419 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251113419

Web | DOI | PDF | Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Paywall
 
Last edited:
Exercise training may help reduce physiological and psychological fatigue in patients with Long COVID. The available evidence suggests that individualized single-modality and multimodal exercise programs may be beneficial for patients experiencing fatigue symptoms. The included interventions generally consisted of 30-60 min sessions, performed 3-6 times per week over at least 8-12 weeks.

Over two thousand years of studying logic may as well have never happened. Dogma and magic still take precedent.
 
However, given the moderate-to-very-low certainty of the evidence, exercise programs should be individualized based on patient response and tolerance.
There is no way any unblinded trial with subjective outcomes should be rated as providing moderate certainty of evidence.

The consequence of having lower quality evidence isn’t that the interventions should be «individualised», whatever that means. The consequence is that you should refrain from using the intervention until there is high quality evidence supporting it.

This review is a charade with preconceived conclusions, produced by people that either lack fundamental scientific understanding, or enough integrity to put the interests of the patients above their own.
 
The consequence of having lower quality evidence isn’t that the interventions should be «individualised», whatever that means. The consequence is that you should refrain from using the intervention until there is high quality evidence supporting it.
Especially given the well known and very serious risks associated with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom