jnmaciuch
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Correction to this point after attending a recent lecture: gdT cells have much fewer options for V, D, and J regions compared to abT cells, but they actually can generate a high degree of diversity because they have a unique feature of incorporating multiple D regions.There is definitely “clonal expansion” downstream of gdTCR activation using all the same pathways as in the alpha betas, it seems. Just a much smaller repertoire set compared to alpha-betas. So there could be some repertoire skewing.
However, even with this correction I am not sure how relevant this for BTN interactions, since the extracellular portion of BTN3A1 is what binds (and may well not bind to the CDR3 region on the gdTCR anyways). There might be some conformational changes induced by the phosphoantigen binding but the protein structure paper seems to suggest that’s probably not the case. So I don’t really see a case for T cell receptor specificity here
[edit: irrelevant here but I just thought it was cool—apparently gdTCRs are longer and can actually wrap around antigens to a certain degree. Meaning that their binding to an antigen resembles B cell/antibody binding more than a standard TCR-MHC-peptide situation. Could be relevant in other disease contexts]