The same anecdotal reports exist for CBT and GET, which is you find people that swear by them. What about those that report improvements whilst on a placebo, should we be handing out those as well? I think the answer is provided by clinical trials which show when something is a moot point. When everyone is in the dark, it is hard to know what is what, but once the light gets turned on things become much clearer.There are anecdotal reports of some ME/CFS patients experiencing significant improvements, in some cases even going from being bedridden to being able to function again
I think everyone understand the patients and their families. They are not to be blamed for anything.But I also understand patients who seek out doctors because they are desperate to try something that might help, even when the evidence is still limited.
If clinicans hand out drugs like lollipops, they also have a responsibility to supply evidence or look at the available evidence. That is all I'm demanding. You can't hand out something 200 times without even looking at the evidence or trying to build some (and this routinely happens in ME/CFS). The situation in ME/CFS is really quite horrible, where the involved clinicans often don't care about evidence or understand the basics of clinical trial methodology. We are talking about something that will one day give historians a nice hobby, a land of psychobabble vs a land of biobabble, with little land in-between. But it seems that there is also a sane island in-between. I'd like to think that is now the way forward.