Long Covid in the media and social media 2022

Discussion in 'Long Covid news' started by rvallee, Feb 3, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    23,032
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    For those in the US, David Perez at Mass Gen Hospital is a very prolific FND author, so worth keeping an eye on his, and his departments, output as well.
     
    EzzieD, Hutan, Sean and 10 others like this.
  2. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    14,837
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    And it’s also worth noting for example that the charity FNDHope is in fact a US charity https://fndhope.org/contact/ this is international issue, not just UK.
     
    EzzieD, Hutan, Sean and 6 others like this.
  3. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,659
    Location:
    Canada
    Filed under: Long Covid is definitely undercounted. All of this flies under the radar. As Jonathan Edwards said so many times, physicians don't really look at symptoms beyond what can be easily treated, they're only useful to diagnose and aren't recorded in a meaningful way.

    I just saw a study of pediatric cases in Iceland. Some LC deniers were gushing over it, how it shows that there is literally nothing there. When all they're looking for is existing diagnoses. They don't really look for symptoms, because it's not how medicine works. So none of the studies using the current paradigm can be accurate, since it's common practice to not do the thing that will see this. It's as valid as asserting that "radio waves" cannot possibly exist since they were never detected, a true statement before the first radio was built. If you don't look, you don't find. If you don't have the technology to look, you can't find.

    None of this is recorded anywhere unless people explicitly ask for it, and the more "official" a study is, the less likely they are to ask about any of this, since it's not in the textbook and medical research doesn't allow people to look at things outside the textbook anymore, it must conform to what's known, otherwise it's impossible.

    And without being told, most people just chalk it off as something else, contrary to the popular mythology around the "worried well" "scanning" for symptoms. Turns out that building an ideology out of caricatures makes for very lousy nonsense. And here we have people literally saying "I don't identify but I definitely have symptoms", making a mockery of the whole "illness identity" nonsense. Doesn't matter, what's true doesn't matter, only consensus over what's true, right or not.
    https://twitter.com/user/status/1545710880733675520
     
    Midnattsol, Hutan, Sean and 5 others like this.
  4. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,659
    Location:
    Canada
    I think this may be one of the most clueless, least self-aware article I have read so far. Full of speculation alongside warning against speculation. Makes explicit causative statements while warning that correlation is not causation, while directly ascribing recovery to rehabilitation, despite admitting most recover naturally. It even warns against trying unevidenced treatments found online, which is the obvious future of "psychological rehabilitation" in the form of CBT apps.

    It actually warns against unevidenced treatment even though there is no evidence whatsoever that CBT or GET, the common "treatments" have any evidence for them in Long Covid. And it attributes it in kids to... *rolls drum*... Fear! You guessed it right. See, kids, who famously follow the news, are afraid of Long Covid, which is absent from all public and media messaging on Covid.

    Shows one thing: absolutely nothing useful has been learned in all this time. Not one thing. Medicine is stuck in place, going around in loops following the trail of breadcrumbs they leave behind them, each time marveling at how more breadcrumbs keep being added as they take them out of their pockets and add to them. Incredible.

    Long Covid: what we know about it and how best to treat it
    https://www.theguardian.com/austral...hat-we-know-about-it-and-how-best-to-treat-it
     
    EzzieD, Art Vandelay, Sean and 7 others like this.
  5. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,064
    Location:
    Australia
    Another Australian media article on LC. Does include some predictable BPS/functional stuff from Prof Lloyd, but also other views, including a mention of ME/CFS.

    Behind a paywall, but here are some excerpts:

     
  6. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,776
    Hutan, alktipping and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  7. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    23,032
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Opinion piece in the UK's Financial Times: Covid’s chronic effects loom increasingly large

    "The chief concern is now long Covid. This condition frequently draws sceptical responses due to its oft-changing clinical definition and the difficulties in teasing it apart from other underlying health issues, but there is mounting evidence of a very real phenomenon.

    ...

    If an uptick in self-reported brain fog still doesn’t pass muster for you, then perhaps an uptick in self-reported dropping out of the workforce might. The above trends are echoed by labour market data on both sides of the Atlantic, which show marked increases in the number of people either absent from work, cutting their hours or exiting the labour force entirely due to ill health.

    In the UK, 1.8mn people were out of work and not looking for a job due to illness in the three months ending April 2022, up by 269,000 or 17 per cent since the start of the pandemic. In the US, 1.35mn people were absent from work due to illness in May 2022, up 44 per cent on the pre-pandemic average for the same month, while 2.2mn had shifted from full-time to part-time work due to illness, a 37 per cent rise. The number outside the labour force who have a disability has jumped by 800,000 since the pandemic began, accounting for one-fifth of the 4mn labour force dropouts over this period."

    https://www.ft.com/content/63dcc4d1-8b53-4110-bd44-10e3d1d98585
     
  8. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,776
    Hutan and Trish like this.
  9. Kalliope

    Kalliope Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,570
    Location:
    Norway
    A paediatrician specialising in infectious diseases named Paul A. Offit was guest at the latest This Week in Virology.

    At 38.12 prof. Racaniello asks him whether or not vaccination against Covid-19 prevents Long Covid.

    Dr. Offit answers with a deep sigh and asks them to define Long Covid. He says he thinks there's much to learn about this, immunologically, virologically, psychologically. The symptom that seems to rise to the top is fatigue. If that's true, then he has Long Covid. They all laugh. Then they say that fatigue is serious, but that many people are tired, right?

    This was quite disappointing. I thought Long Covid was taken much more serious than this among Covid-19 experts?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXJ2Y2ARMvU


     
    Simbindi, Snow Leopard, Ali and 11 others like this.
  10. shak8

    shak8 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,427
    Location:
    California
    I would count their facetious treatment of fatigue as a symptom of their lack of expertise in the area of long covid. Everyone in the panel has her or his limitations in how much they know and dependent on what their area of specialization is.

    Offit is a vaccine expert. Well worth listening to. No one is perfect.
     
  11. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    We don't expect perfection. Merely competence and understanding of issues.
     
    mango, Binkie4, rvallee and 9 others like this.
  12. duncan

    duncan Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,738
    Wish someone asked him about chronic Lyme. I'm getting an uneasy feeling that perhaps he holds LC with the same regard he does chronic Lyme - which is to say not very highly.

    Hey, but that would at least make him consistent.
     
  13. shak8

    shak8 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,427
    Location:
    California
    I left a comment on the TVIV website on the "leave comments" section addressing your concerns, I think.

    The virologists and Paul Offit should not have been so cavalier in their ha-ha it's only fatigue comments and laughter--it hurts and it's wrong. All they need to say is: we are not clinicians dealing with long covid patients.

    Offit seems to have a problem with feeling pressured by the question. Some scientists bristle when there isn't enough solid research, when the facts don't all add up. Could be some of that. Does not excuse the attitude.

    Thanks for your comments.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2022
  14. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    14,837
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    Thank you @shak8 maybe the researchers don’t realise that with @dave30th connection to Virology blog website their discussions might reach a wider audience. Perhaps they wouldn’t have been flippant if they realised.
     
    Missense, Binkie4, EzzieD and 8 others like this.
  15. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,064
    Location:
    Australia
    From Australia:
     
    Lilas, mango, Binkie4 and 5 others like this.
  16. Art Vandelay

    Art Vandelay Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    596
    Location:
    Adelaide, Australia
    This article sums up the situation in Australia. There's very little financial support for people with post-viral illnesses and the treatment offered is just useless and harmful rehabilitation:

     
  17. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    23,032
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    "Heads up to researchers: a Request for Proposals (RFP) for research on #LongCovid and associated conditions will be released later this month!"

    "Patient-Led Research Collaborative (@patientled) will be posting the RFP in late July, with a due date of mid-Sept. ~$5 million in grants will be awarded, funded by Balvi. Biomedical research is eligible (including diagnostics, clinical trials, studies on pathophysiology)."

    "The RFP will be posted at patientresearchcovid19.com/projects/patie… the week of July 25th and we will announce on Twitter as well."

     
    Lilas, Hutan, SNT Gatchaman and 4 others like this.
  18. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    23,032
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Thousands seeking unproven long Covid blood treatments abroad

    "Apheresis, a blood filtering treatment normally used for lipid disorders, involves needles being put into each arm and the blood passing over a filter, separating red blood cells from the plasma. The plasma is then recombined with red blood cells and returned to the body via a different vein.

    Gitte Boumeester, a trainee psychiatrist in Almelo, the Netherlands, tried it after developing severe long Covid symptoms.

    After undergoing treatment at The Long Covid Center in Cyprus at a cost of more than €50,000 (£42,376), she returned home with no improvement to her symptoms. She received six rounds of apheresis, as well as nine rounds of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and an intravenous vitamin drip at the Poseidonia clinic next door to the clinic."

    ......

    "Chris Witham, a 45-year-old long Covid patient from Bournemouth, England, spent about £7,000 on apheresis treatment (including travel and accommodation costs) in Kempten, Germany, last year. “I’d have sold my house and given it away to get better, without a second thought,” he said. The treatment did not improve his long Covid symptoms, the BMJ reported."

    https://www.theguardian.com/society...g-unproven-long-covid-blood-treatments-abroad


    The BMJ article, 'Long covid patients travel abroad for expensive and experimental “blood washing”'

    "Patients with long covid are travelling to private clinics in Cyprus, Germany, and Switzerland for blood filtering apheresis and anticoagulation drugs. Experts question whether these invasive treatments should be offered without sufficient evidence. Madlen Davies reports

    Gitte Boumeester, a trainee psychiatrist in Almelo, the Netherlands, was infected with SARS-CoV-2 in November 2020. She was tired for weeks afterwards but chalked it up to the virus. Soon, she was experiencing such extreme fatigue that it took her two hours to walk to the kitchen to make breakfast. She had brain fog and heart palpitations, was short of breath, often felt sick, and woke up in the night with chest pain. A battery of tests found nothing wrong with her heart or lungs, and she was sent back to her GP. She left her job in November 2021, after two failed attempts to go back to work.

    She joined a Facebook group for patients with long covid, many of whom discussed travel to Germany for apheresis, what some of them call a “blood washing” treatment. Apheresis, in which large needles are inserted into the veins and the blood is filtered, removing lipids and inflammatory proteins, is recommended by the German Society of Nephrology as a standard last resort in the country for lipid disorders. A new clinic offering apheresis for long covid patients, called the Long Covid Center, was opening in Cyprus, and she could be treated there in March. “I thought, what’s the worst thing I’ve got to lose?” she said. “Money was the only thing. I thought, OK, well, why not give it a try?”

    Two months later she was back home in the Netherlands, having spent nearly all her savings—more than €50 000 (£42 400; $60 000)—with no improvement in her symptoms."

    https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1671
    ____________

    This post has been copled to the apheresis discussion thread here
    Please go to that thread to discuss it to keep discussion in one place.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 13, 2022
    ukxmrv, shak8, Lilas and 10 others like this.
  19. John Mac

    John Mac Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,006
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/long-covid-treatment-patients-uk-therapy-b2122307.html
     
    Sean, Hutan, alktipping and 3 others like this.
  20. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,659
    Location:
    Canada
    Literally all the treatments officially used for LC are untested, and in the case of CBT and GET, have no basis for any of the claims they make. So all the clinics are pushing unevidenced treatments, including treatments known to harm. Literally all of them. Doesn't bother anyone. In fact they are praised as if they basically solved it.

    Anyway, this plot is thickening faster than gravy after adding a cup of flour:

    The reporter who wrote the story is buddy with Paul Garner and previously promoted Garner's story. The depth of corruption in healthcare is seriously astounding, this is not a properly regulated profession at all.

    https://twitter.com/user/status/1547279124489707520


    This has the SMC's fingerprints all over it. And the only suspicion for this is that they've been doing things like this for decades.
     
    ukxmrv, Ali, EzzieD and 9 others like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page