Maeve Boothby O'Neill - articles about her life, death and inquest

I've just been able to read the full Times Article.

Let Justice Arise
Poet: Catherine Pulsifer

In the stillness of truth, let justice arise,
With eyes that see beyond biased disguise.
For each soul, regardless of birth or faith,
Deserves an equal measure, a fair wraith.

Be it woman or man, see respect profound,
Let not prejudice spin its wheels around.
In seeking justice, we must unite,
For justice knows no bounds when right takes flight.
 
Reddit discussion —

Presumably what the gastroenterologists call the 'robust psychological support' they recommend as the cure for starvation. I learnt that therapists are trained to behave as if they know what they are doing when they don't all the time when I did my training in rehabilitation (for which I was accredited as a rehabilitation physician) in 1983. I decided that rehabilitation was not for me.
 
In unity with Maeve and her family, by way of support, I share my 'experience' of ME/CFS. It highlights the same themes.

It was only when updating my knowledge of FII, FDIA that I realised that my medical records are also likely to contain some reference of both FII, and also FDIA (the latter includes pets).

From January to August 2020 during lockdown I was becoming more and more malnourished and so were my two cats, my only companions after 14 years with severe ME/CFS. The isolation in this illness is imposed not sought. After they died in my arms from starvation and in my own increasingly amaciated state I had to summon the strength to bury them in the garden. By August I was suicidal, I wanted to end my suffering. It was only after I would not go quietly into that good night and raged, raged at the dying of light, that anybody noticed. By that time, I no longer cared about living. Police were called and carried out welfare checks several times, then came the social workers for the same reason.

I was hospitalised twice for malnutrition and sent home with a six pack of ensures each time. They were busy though dealing with the pandemic, after all, people were dying. Through no fault of their own.

After more raging by playing loud music and destroying my own property, I was put in a place of safety, twice where they literally nothing then returned home. I was continuing to starve and I'd resolved by that point I would rage until I could finally rage no more. I was scooped up by the police in the middle of the night and taken to hospital for a pscyhe assesesstment. I was left in a room with a bright light on for what seemed like hours until the psychiatrist arrived in a pair.

Eventually I was arrested and charged, for disturbing the community. As I was deemed a danger to myself and to others in my increasingly malnourished state I was placed on remand in a womens' prison, who have absolutely no idea nor care about ME/CFS. A more noisy unsuitable environment for a severe ME/CFS patient does not exist. On being forced to walk from one cell block across a courtyard to another carrying my own bedding wash kit, towels etc after being refused a wheelchair - I collapsed. I kept trying to end my life and so I was sectioned after refusing to take sertraline until I was told by a medical professional what it was for. As I was walked through the prison corridor to the van to take me to goodness knows where as I had not been told I had been sectioned, one of the guards behind me said to another, she's faking it. I hit out with my walking stick and was placed in head down restraint and bundled into the back of the van.

After, what I later learned was a journey of 125miles I was deposited at a secure mental health unit. By that point I could barely lift my head and was slurring my speech. Meals and weight were monitored and I was medicated. When I refused to take the medication until I was told what the side effects were and what I had been diagnosed with, I was placed in face down restraint by 4 attendants, my pyjamas (which I had been arrested in) were pulled down and injected with it. That happened twice, before I eventually gave up trying to assert my rights as citizen and more importantly as a human being.

I didn't even know why everyone was wearing masks, insisting on spacing or kept talking about something called Covid. I truly thought I had finally lost my mind because when I asked what it all about, people looked at me as aghast and would not explain.

I gained weight, was compliant and was discharged back to prison where I ended up with a criminal record. All gains, but what had been taken from me was any sense that I was a human being. At one point during the various multi-disciplinary safeguarding meetings, my special assigned specialist mental health GP, my social worker and the police could not find me in the system. I had been lost.

On finally returning home to what had once been a place of happy memories I was met by the Probation Service manager with a new set of keys (my door had been broken down (twice), we met at the doorstep by one of my jackets on top of a large box of food. The Police officers who had to keep arresting me when I couldnt get to the Crown Court hearings 8 miles away, had prepared for my return by going into my kitchen, and noticing not a scrap of food was in the house. They bought me basic provisions and left them outside that morning with my coat in case I had to wait outside for the probation office manager.

Both my specialist GP and the Probation service Manager told me that their view was I should never have been sent 'down the criminal route'. Cold comfort after what I had been through as I was, by then, a very severe ME/CFS patient.

At every single stage, my physical condition due to severe ME/CFS was either completely ignored or dismissed. I was discharged from the secure unit to the local mental health service who wrote confirming that my diagnosis was Anorexia Nervosa due to self neglect and responsible for the death of my cats due to neglect., and paranoia. When I telephoned them on the probation supplied telephone to challenge the anorexia nervosa diagnosis and the self neglect they confirmed they would amend the record. I asked them to write to me confirming it. They never did. Apparently, I have an unreasonable fear that the state will harm me.

Why was I without food? The DWP had stopped my benefits as I had failed to respond to review process in time. My care company had returned to contract to social services as they no longer had the staff to fulfil it. They gave me 24hrs notice. By the time of the review, I was too unwell to respond and was alone. The DWP failed in it's duty of care as did Social Services.

Apparently, whatever the circumstances, in the UK people with ME/CFS always do it to themselves, are always unreliable witnesses to their own experience, and never have a voice! And the reason I'm a severe ME/CFS patient? I was referred to the Bath Clinic by my GP under the 2007 NICE Guideline and the Department of Health publication https://www.nhshealthatwork.co.uk/images/library/files/Clinical excellence/CFS_full_guideline.pdf 2006 while I was simultaneously attempting a phased return to work, being managed by my employers Occupational Health Department, with assistance from Access to Work who had already organised for help with getting to work, moving my desk to the ground floor and other adaptations. I was never able to make use of it because after a six week course, I walked unaided and came out needing a wheelchair and that course did not include GET.

I tell my experience with this illness and level of broken trust which exists for one reason only. Maeve did not fall through any gap in service provision, THIS IS the service provision in the UK and always has been!

This patient experience is demonstrated on my medical file as a CFS diagnosis, Secondary Polycythaemia of unknown underlying cause, Anorexia Nervosa due to self neglect and Paranoia and finally a referral for suspected peripheral neuropathy, where no action was taken after one Consultant appointment. I dread to think what else it contains.

I am, in the eyes of the healthcare profession, a typical ME/CFS patient; with no right of complaint if I were a child or the parents of one.

I knew my legal rights, and it made not a jot of difference. Titration of medications and the impact of side effects is now in the 2021 NICE Guideline which is being ignored wholesale.

When I returned to my home in February 2021, Maeve was already on her final pathway through what passes for the right to healthcare of anyone of any age in the UK with ME/CFS.

I was 62 years old when this happened to me.

Now I have been officially diagnosed with paranoia expressed in an unreasonable fear that the state will harm me.

The Final Delivery Plan confirms that this fear is not unreasonable.

Res ipsa loquitur
 
This is pretty much what happened to me back in 2008. By the time I dropped the therapy it was just 45 minute sessions of hearing how much I sucked as a person and why I deserved to be ill, every session they'd give me different advice and when I didn't improve they pretended they had never said it and told me I should have done the opposite of whatever they had said to do last time. Things like "when you are tired you should listen to your body and rest" followed by "when you"re tired you should push through it and walk somewhere". Whichever one I had been doing previously was always the wrong one and also a sign of why I deserved to be ill. At one point I was being told to walk a certain amount per day, but I was banned from going to supermarkets and the bank, because I was already going to those places so they must be making me ill. I was told to walk the same amount as I would have been if I was going there, but I had to walk in the opposite direction only. I asked how I was meant to get food and money and they told me they I had to come up with these kinds of solutions myself and the fact that I was asking that was proof that I was lazy and deserved to be ill.

I noticed a similar dynamic, albeit less extreme when doing psychotherapy. It seemed that the starting point is the assumption that the patient is doing something wrong. Since the therapist cannot know what that is, they can only propose different variations of "this is what you're doing wrong" and the hope is that the patient will consider that point of view and test it and find out for themselves whether that is true or not.

When the therapist is not doing a good job, this can degrade into a dynamic where the therapist inundates the patient with superficial, false prejudices. The patient will feel misunderstood and blamed. The points of view proposed will lack useful insight. Therapy degrades into something stressful with little to no gain.

It helps to be aware that therapists probably don't dislike you personally. They may have inadequate training, be overworked, lack understanding of the problems the patient is dealing with, or have their own problems going on in their lives that make it harder to also confront the problems of another person.

Therapy should encourage playing around with different ways to think about your personal problems. New ways of thinking about a problem can lead to near-optimal solutions. But one shouldn't start from rigid assumptions, like for example that the patient cannot have already found a near-optimal solution for managing their disability. That's how carefully developed pacing strategies and acceptance of one's disability and limitations after a long painful process of personal growth get labelled as maladaptive.
 
Last edited:
Sadly if you are a child accessing NHS services the proforma is to dig for adverse child experiences, and to keep digging as there must be something there which accounts for things.
There is a very limited treatment approach which still centres on CBT . It's a sausage machine.

A friend of a friend who left CAMHS confirmed this. They had a set process and were not supposed to deviate even if question responses invoked an obvious issue. They left the service appalled that they could not sensitively counsel a child with suicidal tendencies .
Like FII it reframes things to suit a tick box agenda.
 
It sometimes feels like the underlying issue is that disability is framed as psychological problem because society cannot accept that the patient is disabled (and unable to work or contribute in a meaningful way).

A useful message, bluntly expressed, could be to "hate the disease, not the sufferer".
 
Sadly if you are a child accessing NHS services the proforma is to dig for adverse child experiences, and to keep digging as there must be something there which accounts for things.
There is a very limited treatment approach which still centres on CBT . It's a sausage machine.

A friend of a friend who left CAMHS confirmed this. They had a set process and were not supposed to deviate even if question responses invoked an obvious issue. They left the service appalled that they could not sensitively counsel a child with suicidal tendencies .
Like FII it reframes things to suit a tick box agenda.
At which point surel then that isn’t therapy (and these people need to stop being allowed to use the terms they do falsely in order to mislead) but taking advantage of that position they’ve been given only by the disguise of ‘therapy’ historically supposedly being therapeutic so ‘doing good’

It feels like the lines talked about to justify powers they hold are not heeded in reality and there are big issues in the sector and what it actually does. As if I’m surprised but that it has got so out of hand and law etc hasn’t picked up on it in this day and age, well yes it reminds me I should be because that’s scandal level.

They know and would have had it hammered in via any training 20/30yrs ago of the issues with creating false memories due to that bring a big scandal then for the entire area. So I find it shocking that this which seems to have direct lessons from that and the well known debunked munchausen bi proxy trials where they allowed one man’s personal testimony based on his personal views of things to dominate rulings that sent people to jail got uncovered but has anyone demonstrated they learned lessons from that ?
 
The long Times article of 19/7/2025
'We demanded help for our sick children. We were accused of abuse
Some of society’s most vulnerable are being torn from their families by officials who claim their parents are fabricating illness'

Accessible Archive Link:

'New research shows that FII [Fabricated or Induced Illness] has been substantiated only in four serious case reviews since 2010 and caused no deaths. Yet a snapshot survey by the University of Leeds in 2023 found that almost 400 families reported having been accused of FII.'

.

I've now managed to read the whole of this earlier article, which is what prompted Sarah, Maeve's mum, to contact The Times regarding her own experience of it.

I can now therefore disclose what else I found during my FII and FDIA research last Sunday. When you've been diagnosed with paranoia resulting from an unreasonable fear the state will harm you ,anythiing that you subsequently say along the same lines can cause me to be scooped up again, as I would appear to be demonstrating that paranoia. I therefore have to be even more careful with facts, than I was before.

The parents of children or vulnerable adults who fear further FII or FDIA investigations (mostly women) will feel similar fear of speaking out after they've been investigated, even if subsequently cleared.

It is the best of all ways to silence opposing voices, and that of the patient's and their families, is it not.

Of special note is that the RCPCH 2021 Guideline was published in February 2021. NICE Guideline 2021 was published 18 October 2021.

Before there was a RCPCH 2021 updated guideline on FII and FDIA. There was one from the RCP published March 2020. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/defa...r-induced-illness-(fii).pdf?sfvrsn=658db320_4


Publication of the ME/CFS NICE Guideline ng206 was stopped at the 11th hour the day before its due publication date of 8 October 2021.
The Royal Colleges had objected to its publication. Maeve had died earlier at the beginning of October 2021.

This immediately triggered a grant of Legal Aid for for a Judicial Review of that decision on behalf of - (a Minor). Roundtable meetings were called by NICE to try and reach agreement. It was eventually published on 29 October 2021.

These facts will never change. This was, and still is, the 'existing service' provision which is being considered in the NIHR HERITAGE programme.

From article :

Clements said: “The thing that hits you like a freight train when you get those survey responses is the trauma that families experience. Some of them have spent periods in prison before being vindicated. Many of them have lost their jobs. Many of them will never ever have anything to do with social services or health services again.”

Dr Luke Geoghegan, head of policy and research at the British Association of Social Workers, said: “This feels like it could be a moral panic. The number [of families accused] does seem to be very high, which makes me suspicious.”

A paper recently published in The British Journal of Social Work suggests the risk of FII may be overstated.

Andy Bilson, emeritus professor of social work at the University of Central Lancashire, said: “Although a range of guidance and journal papers suggest that FII is associated with a high risk of mortality or serious harm in as many as 10 per cent of cases, analysis of serious case reviews in England from 2010 to 2021 found no child deaths resulting from FII and only four cases of serious harm, all linked to earlier concerns about overmedicalisation or clinical error.”
Bilson believes official guidance “pathologises disagreement” by parents.
Melody's case

The inquest heard that a doctor had emailed another staff member to say they “should not pander to this family”. Driscoll said: “We were classed as problem parents because my daughter didn’t have a voice. I spoke for her. And this doctor was very much of the view that — she even said it to us — ‘I am the one with the PhD, you’re just the parent’.”

Since her daughter’s death, Driscoll has been plagued by fears that the younger of her other five children will be taken away. When the school wanted one of them to be assessed for additional needs, she was scared to sign the paperwork in case she was accused again.
Driscoll said: “Even though I was proven innocent, it’s still on my records that I’ve been accused of it. So I still get looked at differently”.

To understand the entirety of relevant context the whole article should be read.

I shan't be here for a while now as I return to pacing properly, finish the complaint, and prepare for the battle ahead because of the second Prevention of Future Deaths Report received by the DHSC on 7 July 2025, and the continuing manifest imbalance of power and abuse of power.

There was an article in the Times last Thursday Jan 16th which contained a short paragraph referring to Maeve's inquest. " A Devon coroner complained: " I write a lot of these [PFD] reports and often nothing happens."

PFD = prevention of future deaths

The article entitled " Reform our failing inquest system urges sister of tragic head teacher" focuses on the death of Ruth Perry, who died by suicide after an Ofsted inspection in which the primary school of which she was Head was downgraded from 'outstanding' to 'requires improvement'.
Her sister Professor Julia Walters called for reform of the inquest system and said that " public bodies should be legally compelled to make changes when concerns were raised by coroners."( my bold)

She also drew attention to "disparities in the allocation of legal funding." Public bodies receive taxpayers' money to fund legal teams while families are often not awarded legal aid. I think this was the case at Maeve's inquest. Perry's family crowdfunded £50,000 to pay a legal team.

Public bodies were identified by the coroner in Maeve's inquest but Sean O'Neill thought their responses lacked substance. See David Tuller (@dave30th ).A requirement to make changes would have made a significant difference.

https://virology.ws/2024/12/11/trai...to-coroners-report-in-boothby-oneill-inquest/

edit: amendment of Julia Walters occupation
 
Back
Top Bottom