Kalliope
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
As Nina E. Steinkopf provides many of her excellent blog posts in English, I thought it could be useful to from now on have a separate thread for them, instead of them mostly being shared in the thread for news from Scandinavia.
This blog post of today is related to the planned Lightning Process study in Norway which recently had its ethical approval rejected. It is also about the placebo effect in general and that the medical field has a lot to lose when alternative therapies are piggy backing on the placebo response.
She shares a long quote (with permission) from professor Fabrizio Benedetti from his 2019 article in Clin. Pharmacy titled: The Dangerous Side of Placebo Research: Is Hard Science Boosting Pseudoscience?"
English: Is placebo research boosting pseudoscience?
Norwegian: Bidrar placebo-forskning til økt pseudovitenskap?
Quote:
- when hard science started investigating placebo effects, it unconsciously produced a shift in quackery thinking. In fact, charlatans are becoming more and more aware that their bizarre interventions could work through a placebo effect. Indeed, whereas hard science has so far denied any scientific basis for nonconventional therapies, now the very same hard science certifies that the placebo effect has scientific grounds. Therefore, quacks are no longer interested in showing that their pseudo-interventions work; rather, they justify their use on the basis of the possibility that these bizarre interventions may induce strong placebo effects…
This blog post of today is related to the planned Lightning Process study in Norway which recently had its ethical approval rejected. It is also about the placebo effect in general and that the medical field has a lot to lose when alternative therapies are piggy backing on the placebo response.
She shares a long quote (with permission) from professor Fabrizio Benedetti from his 2019 article in Clin. Pharmacy titled: The Dangerous Side of Placebo Research: Is Hard Science Boosting Pseudoscience?"
English: Is placebo research boosting pseudoscience?
Norwegian: Bidrar placebo-forskning til økt pseudovitenskap?
Quote:
- when hard science started investigating placebo effects, it unconsciously produced a shift in quackery thinking. In fact, charlatans are becoming more and more aware that their bizarre interventions could work through a placebo effect. Indeed, whereas hard science has so far denied any scientific basis for nonconventional therapies, now the very same hard science certifies that the placebo effect has scientific grounds. Therefore, quacks are no longer interested in showing that their pseudo-interventions work; rather, they justify their use on the basis of the possibility that these bizarre interventions may induce strong placebo effects…