Sometimes questions just answer themselves:
And herein lies the rub. Why is euthanasia offered as a viable solution to a potentially non-permanent problem, when other options are possible?
Mental health services in Canada (and elsewhere) are scarce. Psychologists are expensive and out of reach for many. Psychiatric services are free of charge, but the wait lists are even longer than those for psychologists and few people can get access. The wait to get help is usually over a year. Family physicians just end up prescribing medications based on a checklist and see what sticks.
Those living with chronic pain and disability have been put at the front of the line for MAID. Readily being presented with assisted dying services—instead of treatments or alternatives—can create a sense of being undervalued or marginalized. It implies that end-of-life choices should be prioritized over efforts to provide care, support, or treatments that could improve one's quality of life or extend their lifespan.
Mental health services aren't an option in most of those cases. They could be scarce, they could be plentiful, and it wouldn't change anything, because they have nothing to do with the problem. Solutions have to at least relate to the problem, to be effective they have to directly target it. Not here, but this kind of thinking is exactly why there aren't any real options, and people pushed into despair take desperate measures.
If I was offered such services, I wouldn't even know what to do. That is if I accepted, which I wouldn't. Even if it was available on my own time from home. This is not what I need. It has nothing to do with my problems, offers no solution to them. I need this as much as I need to learn to tame lions. I already did it once, early when I first got ill, and I didn't even know what to talk about. I had an easy life and was, and still am, as well-adjusted as a person can be.
So the simple reality of why there aren't options here is that it's all by choice, that the medical profession would rather cling to junk fantasies about magical powers of the mind than do the damn work that needs to be done, even if it causes people to kill themselves, to suffer needlessly, and to die early even if they don't do it themselves. Options are possible, they're even relatively easy, but it goes against how medicine has worked for a long time, and traditions overrule the law and human rights most of the time here.
But damn is this complicated, because there are legitimate reasons for euthanasia. My parents are getting pretty old and I've lost count of how many people they know who went through it, rather than suffer agonizing slow deaths from cancer or degenerative diseases. I know for certain that my mother will go through this, largely because of how she saw her own mother, and my father's mother, suffer and languish, even after they wanted to end it.
Really I don't see much of a difference between euthanizing disabled people who could be helped, and just leaving us to suffer needlessly entirely out of choice, in the service of a bullshit ideology. They're just as vile, the methods don't really matter, the real scandal here is the negligence, the denial and inability to do better out of sheer stubbornness and ineptitude.