The matter is particularly confusing when there are a huge number of papers that continue to be published that either purport to document neuroinflammation or that take it as a given (to say nothing of the patient community that has, quite understandably, largely accepted the idea) - it's just that most of the members of this forum, notably including dedicated researchers, are unconvinced by or disagree with these findings.
But that could change. See, for example, the initial reaction to this paper, shared today.
Some time ago, completely baffled by the contradictory information, I started this thread, which might help to understand some of the issue (then again, it might not...).
It's all really quite a mess.
But that could change. See, for example, the initial reaction to this paper, shared today.
Some time ago, completely baffled by the contradictory information, I started this thread, which might help to understand some of the issue (then again, it might not...).
It's all really quite a mess.