Oslo Chronic Fatigue Network

[Utsikt]

Is that "as long as you agree with us"?

I genuinely do have questions, which we have discussed else thread, but how do I ask them without being branded vexatious?

You can’t, because they won’t. It’s just more gaslighting.

 

[Sly Saint]

OPINION:

Marit Stafseth BOARD MEMBER OF THE NORWEGIAN COVID ASSOCIATION
https://www.sciencenorway.no/covid1...c-fatigue-consortium-enough-is-enough/2503517

"
I would like to add that if the members of the consortium were willing to approach this with an open mind and lend me an ear, I could tell them that several patients have told me they benefit from cognitive therapy. Many patients need someone to talk to about how to cope with the illness.

There is nothing inherently wrong with cognitive therapy, but with the content OCFC has chosen to give the cognitive therapy."

 

[Sean]

There is nothing inherently wrong with cognitive therapy,...

Correct. Just as there is nothing inherently wrong with radiotherapy, antibiotics, or blood-letting.

But there is a huge problem when any therapy is used inappropriately or incorrectly.

 

[MittEremltage]

A recently published scientific paper on a study investigating how doctors manage patients with fatigue confirms that it is inappropriate for primary care doctors to recruit patients to the Fatigue Study. Bizarrely, four out of five researchers in this study are also working on the Fatigue Study (linked to Oslo Chronic Fatigue Consortium).

Read more on my blog (Google Translated):
Newly published article confirms ethical problems with the Fatigue Study

Thread on S4ME about the article:
Physicians’ experiences of assessing and supporting fatigued patients in primary care: a focus group study, 2025, Samuelsson