Does it matter? Isn't he best ignored? If we ask questions like this to try to get the details of his story straight, doesn't that imply it matters?
Whether an individual had long covid for 6 months or a year before recovering doesn't make their fantasy about why the recovered a useful piece of scientific evidence. It's still just one person's anecdote.
At least in this latest version there's an excellent response from Charles Shepherd.
I think I may write Garner a personal letter/email. He is making such a fool of himself but also of his profession. I am thinking of doing my UCL departmental seminar this next academic year on the Cochrane Conspiracy, in which he is likely to feature.
I think I may write Garner a personal letter/email. He is making such a fool of himself but also of his profession. I am thinking of doing my UCL departmental seminar this next academic year on the Cochrane Conspiracy, in which he is likely to feature.
He is responding to an article written about Ron Davis here:
Irresponsible comment. 19 recovered patients wrote in the BMJ recently "opposite message—that there is no hope without a future biomedical cure—can also be harmful. The nocebo effect, where negative expectations can exacerbate symptoms or impair recovery, is well documented, and its impact is especially strong when shaped by medical authorities"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.