nataliezzz
Established Member (Voting Rights)
PEM is a unique symptom because it is not a symptom of (many) other disorders, but that does not mean that in people for whom all of these symptoms tend to cluster in varying combinations (fatigue, unrefreshing/disturbed sleep, body pain, brain fog, IBS, sensory sensitivities, etc. and yes, PEM) that presence/absence of PEM specifically makes it a different disorder (in my opinion). For example, a quick Google search indicated there's a study that found 47% of a sample of GWI patients endorsed PEM. Let's just presume this is a good study for the moment (I haven't looked into it); I don't think 47% of GWI patients having PEM mean that 47% of GWI patients have a separate/additional underlying disorder (ME/CFS) in addition to whatever is causing their GWI while those w/ just fatigue/pain/cognitive dysfunction/disturbed sleep/etc. w/ no PEM only have GWI.@nataliezzz
There’s a lot here I’m not going to comment on, but I’ll try to see if I understand your assertion.
You believe that there might be a factor X, that in combination with factor Y, causes PEM, and e.g. in combination with Z, causes OI? (X, Y, and Z might be multiple factors.) And X + P results in widespread pain, and so on.
And you call factor X: ME/CFS?
To me, that’s just wrong, because you’re redefining the concept of ME/CFS. But it might be a language thing where what you actually mean isn’t the diagnosis/concept of ME/CFS, but rather the currently unknown mechanism(s) that manifests as the cluster of symptoms we call ME/CFS?
But that still wouldn’t be right because ME/CFS requires PEM, so the mechanism(s) behind ME/CFS must include Y.
That's my personal opinion (that I am trying to convince others of the validity of).
I have no idea, either. Sorry.PS, I think we might be in the wrong thread again. I don’t know where to put this, because it isn’t really about PEM per se. And the concept of ME/CFS thread is about a specific paper.