Q&A: Avindra Nath, MD

You're right - it would also make far more sense to use an infection which is commonly accepted as a trigger for ME/CFS. EBV is one, but that would basically equate to a standard healthy control. In fact, why not just use standard healthy controls in general, if the purpose is to compare us with people who have had infections and didn't get permanently ill afterward? Everyone has had infections, after all ... no need to confine it to a specific one, especially one as controversial as Lyme.

Didn't White do quite a lot of research on post EBV fatigue, and comparison with those who recovered?
 
I came away from this interview with an uneasy feeling. The lead investigator seems centered on - yet again - fatigue. Moreover, the other ME/CFS feature that appeared to have his attention is malaise?
The IOM (and now CDC) diagnostic criteria start off with loss of function:

"A substantial reduction or impairment in the ability to engage in pre-illness levels of occupational, educational, social, or personal activities".

Only after loss of function are fatigue and PEM mentioned.
 
Shouldn't it be PEM, that unique and distinguishing symptom which is NOT malaise, but a dramatic and debilitating worsening of symptoms, either individually or collectively, following exertion, that can last from hours to days to weeks?

The entire second visit (which I completed last week) is dedicated to studying PEM. A week of pre-tests, an exercise challenge, and then a week of timed repeat tests. The design was put in place after NIH listened to a patient PEM focus group. At set points after the exercise test, a researcher asked if I felt the exercise had exacerbated any physical, cognitive, or emotional symptoms. She gently nudged me to try to separate effects of being in the hospital (travel lag, bad sleep) from the effects of exercise. Blood was drawn at 1 hour, 4 hours, 24, 48, and 72 hours after exercise, and spinal fluid taken at 48 hours. I also did pre- and post-exercise cognitive tests, fMRI, EEG, and other tests. All of this to characterize PEM and map the shape of it over time. It's a really smart design and the patients who contributed to the focus groups should be thanked.
 
Last I heard I think 5 patients had gone through the first inpatient visit and only 2 of these were both available and assessed suitable to go on to the next inpatient stage.

Sixteen patients have completed visit one and two patients have finished visit two (so are done with the study). About the same number of healthy controls have been run.
 
The entire second visit (which I completed last week) is dedicated to studying PEM. A week of pre-tests, an exercise challenge, and then a week of timed repeat tests. The design was put in place after NIH listened to a patient PEM focus group. At set points after the exercise test, a researcher asked if I felt the exercise had exacerbated any physical, cognitive, or emotional symptoms. She gently nudged me to try to separate effects of being in the hospital (travel lag, bad sleep) from the effects of exercise. Blood was drawn at 1 hour, 4 hours, 24, 48, and 72 hours after exercise, and spinal fluid taken at 48 hours. I also did pre- and post-exercise cognitive tests, fMRI, EEG, and other tests. All of this to characterize PEM and map the shape of it over time. It's a really smart design and the patients who contributed to the focus groups should be thanked.

I had no idea they were studying PEM in such a way. Should you come across any of these patients who helped steering the study in this direction, @B_V , please extend them my sincerest thanks! And my thanks to you if you were one of them.

So we now have a "Team Post-Exertional Malaise" and I am quite happy...
 
I had no idea they were studying PEM in such a way. Should you come across any of these patients who helped steering the study in this direction, @B_V , please extend them my sincerest thanks! And my thanks to you if you were one of them.

So we now have a "Team Post-Exertional Malaise" and I am quite happy...

Now I am waiting for the PwME band “Team Critics” to break up. After reading Brian’s posts, it’s clear to me that the NIH is doing way more than I realized. I withdraw all of my previous critical remarks, about the NIH study, because my US tax dollars are helping to fund the most comprehensive scientific study of ME, ever! And that make me... quite happy!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom