wingate
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
It makes me wonder what an org like Balvi or Solve or anyone else uses to evaluate the success of projects they fund.They raised a very sizeable sum from patients and got funding from Balvi.
Now they just keep on attracting funding and money from patients and organisations (such as Solve M.E.) without anything to show for it?
One would hope they would monitor projects like remission biome to see if it worked out (or even was completed) because they don’t want to just throw their money away.
But based on @Hutan’s conversations with Solve in that thread, I would say the definition of success is quite subjective.
Last edited: