Salt

Mij

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Salt from the autonomic perspective, 2022, William P Cheshire - editorial

Regarding the management of orthostatic hypotension, it may come as a surprise that there is no empirical evidence to support increasing dietary salt (Biaggioni, 2022). The rationale for increasing salt derives from the inability of patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension to reduce renal sodium excretion when exposed to salt restriction. These patients frequently also have supine hypertension, which induces nocturnal pressure diuresis with further loss of sodium. In these patients added dietary salt has the goal, not of expanding intravascular volume, but of sustaining it by replacing sodium lost during the night (Biaggioni, 2022).

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070222000297?dgcid=author#bb0005
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great find Mij.
Regarding the management of orthostatic hypotension, it may come as a surprise that there is no empirical evidence to support increasing dietary salt
Wow, yes, it does come as a surprise. I wonder if there is any evidence to support the use of salt as a treatment for other sorts of orthostatic intolerance, or to improve orthostatic intolerance symptoms in ME/CFS.

The rationale for increasing salt derives from the inability of patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension to reduce renal sodium excretion when exposed to salt restriction.
It would be good to know if people with ME/CFS are able to reduce renal sodium excretion when exposed to salt restriction. Presumably that is part of autonomic dysfunction?
 
Wow, yes, it does come as a surprise. I wonder if there is any evidence to support the use of salt as a treatment for other sorts of orthostatic intolerance, or to improve orthostatic intolerance symptoms in ME/CFS.

I don't know if there are any studies on ME/CFS patients, but I've seen some studies on the use of high sodium diets for POTS patients.

Here's one, from May 2021. Small numbers (14 POTS patients and 13 healthy controls) but it did show differences:

Effect of High Dietary Sodium Intake in Patients With Postural Tachycardia Syndrome
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume 77, Issue 17, 4 May 2021, Pages 2174-2184

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0735109721006306?via=ihub

Low vs High Sodium diets POTS.jpg
 
High sodium diet is also mentioned in this video from Dysautonomia International, Understanding Blood Volume & Hemodynamics in POTS (posted on April 23, 2021):

Code:
https://vimeo.com/540671549

The section on salt supplementation starts at about 14:15.
 
It would be good to know if people with ME/CFS are able to reduce renal sodium excretion when exposed to salt restriction. Presumably that is part of autonomic dysfunction?
My n=1 is that urine is normal on normal tests including salts (was lucky to have this tested when I had polyuria for extended time), but it was the muscles of my blader that was the problem. Unfortunately the treatment offered was retraining my bladder, which in no way took it into account that the problem came and went based on my level of exertion.
 
Getting back to the topic of salt, and whether there is evidence for high sodium diets helping certain patients -

The first post in this thread uses the term Orthostatic Hypotension (OH). Terms and definitions can differ, or overlap, but I think most folks use OH to mean a fairly quick drop in blood pressure after standing. One definition I found:
Orthostatic hypotension is a physical finding defined by the American Autonomic Society and the American Academy of Neurology as a systolic blood pressure decrease of at least 20 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure decrease of at least 10 mm Hg within three minutes of standing.

By this definition, I do not have OH at all. I can quickly stand up without any sudden drop in blood pressure. I get no symptoms - no dizziness, no seeing stars, no graying out of vision, and definitely no fainting - when I first stand up.

I think if my only diagnosis was OH, and nothing else, I'd only have to be careful about standing up quickly - that transition from sitting or lying to standing up. I wouldn't have all these other disabling symptoms.

And if I did have OH symptoms, I probably would have been diagnosed a lot sooner when I first got sick. I always passed those standard BP tests (take blood pressure when lying/sitting/standing) in the doctor's office. It took five years after the onset of my OI symptoms (pre-syncope symptoms while standing - in the shower, in line at stores, when temperatures were high - but never any fainting/syncope) before someone suggested a tilt table test.

All my OI symptoms are delayed. My symptoms do not happen during the transition from sitting to standing. I start to feel uncomfortable after standing still for about 4-5 minutes. Then it takes 20-30 minutes (roughly) on a tilt table test before my blood pressure plummets and I pass out.

I don't understand all the diagnostic differences between OH and different forms of Orthostatic Intolerance (OI). Also, I think people can have OH along with other diagnoses.

But it seems like there might be different mechanisms that drive OH vs. other types of OI?

And if that's true, then maybe salt can reduce OI symptoms but not OH symptoms?

I have no idea, but it does seem like they are different.

Hope this makes sense. Off to rest - too much brain work this morning!
 
I don't get dizziness/lightheaded when I go from lying down to standing in general, but I do get blurry vision and head, chest pressure when upright for too long. My BP doesn't drop when sitting/standing or lying down. I have heat intolerance, but not all the time.

There is also something called orthostatic cerebral hypoperfusion syndrome w/o OH. There is an abnormal orthostatic drop of cerebral blood flow velocity. Caffeine reduces cerebral blood flow and I experience a negative effect from drinking coffee after lying down and standing up. It makes it all worse until the caffeine leaves my system after 6 hours.
 
I read that vestibular dysfunction can trigger autonomic symptoms.


Then I found that for some vestibular dysfunctions, a diet LOW in salt is recommended.

For those experiencing vestibular disorders, reduction of sodium (along with caffeine and alcohol) is one of the well-known dietary modifications that is recommended. Too much dietary sodium can upset the fluid balance of the body by causing the body to retain water. Changes in body fluid may alter the volume and composition of endolymph (fluid in the inner ear), which supports normal hearing, balance and movement. This is important information, because the fluctuation of inner ear fluid is thought to contribute to symptoms of vestibular disorders.
https://vestibular.org/the-salt-balance/#:~:text=For those experiencing vestibular disorders,the body to retain water.
 
One thing I wonder about in reference to salt/sodium is that I rarely see any mention of potassium in connection with salt/sodium (on ME forums). And yet, in the body they have a very important relationship.

If people have problems maintaining salt levels at a point that is healthy for them, then this suggests their potassium levels might be wrong for good health too.

Just for interest :

Sodium-Potassium Pump : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium–potassium_pump

Electrolyte Imbalance : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolyte_imbalance

Potassium deficiency : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypokalemia

Potassium toxicity : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperkalemia

Sodium deficiency : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyponatremia

Sodium toxicity : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypernatremia
 
Getting back to the topic of salt, and whether there is evidence for high sodium diets helping certain patients -

The first post in this thread uses the term Orthostatic Hypotension (OH). Terms and definitions can differ, or overlap, but I think most folks use OH to mean a fairly quick drop in blood pressure after standing. One definition I found:


By this definition, I do not have OH at all. I can quickly stand up without any sudden drop in blood pressure. I get no symptoms - no dizziness, no seeing stars, no graying out of vision, and definitely no fainting - when I first stand up.

I think if my only diagnosis was OH, and nothing else, I'd only have to be careful about standing up quickly - that transition from sitting or lying to standing up. I wouldn't have all these other disabling symptoms.

And if I did have OH symptoms, I probably would have been diagnosed a lot sooner when I first got sick. I always passed those standard BP tests (take blood pressure when lying/sitting/standing) in the doctor's office. It took five years after the onset of my OI symptoms (pre-syncope symptoms while standing - in the shower, in line at stores, when temperatures were high - but never any fainting/syncope) before someone suggested a tilt table test.

All my OI symptoms are delayed. My symptoms do not happen during the transition from sitting to standing. I start to feel uncomfortable after standing still for about 4-5 minutes. Then it takes 20-30 minutes (roughly) on a tilt table test before my blood pressure plummets and I pass out.

I don't understand all the diagnostic differences between OH and different forms of Orthostatic Intolerance (OI). Also, I think people can have OH along with other diagnoses.

But it seems like there might be different mechanisms that drive OH vs. other types of OI?

And if that's true, then maybe salt can reduce OI symptoms but not OH symptoms?

I have no idea, but it does seem like they are different.

Hope this makes sense. Off to rest - too much brain work this morning!
Yes it’s such an important area that I guess could easily be better on knowledge and GPs then educated more on and would/could transform lives because effects can be so debilitating- but are just poo poohed

I know I’ve had this for over a decade but wouldn’t even know what type to describe - given the level of debilitation I think is associated with it then if these basics are easily done it’s terrible I suffered that for so long and ended up like this. It probably wouldn’t have been hard for these things to have been on check lists and then they’d have known what helped for who too.
 
One thing I wonder about in reference to salt/sodium is that I rarely see any mention of potassium in connection with salt/sodium (on ME forums). And yet, in the body they have a very important relationship.

If people have problems maintaining salt levels at a point that is healthy for them, then this suggests their potassium levels might be wrong for good health too.

Just for interest :

Sodium-Potassium Pump : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium–potassium_pump

Electrolyte Imbalance : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolyte_imbalance

Potassium deficiency : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypokalemia

Potassium toxicity : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperkalemia

Sodium deficiency : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyponatremia

Sodium toxicity : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypernatremia
I think potassium is more likely to be picked up - is it either in the standard battery or more likely to be thought of than sodium by HCPs?
 
not directly related but may be of interest

"
Does Salt Really Cause High Blood Pressure? Think Again..."
In short, no. The castle was built on a foundation of sand.

While it’s easy to find an array of studies demonstrating small drops in blood pressure with lowered salt intake, these results do not necessarily indicate any sort of causative role of salt consumption in high blood pressure. The results seen are typically so minimal that it becomes obvious to a scrupulous eye that there is a more intricate story at play.

For example, the Department of Health and Human Services funded an 11 trial salt restriction study executed by the Cochrane Collaboration in 2004, that demonstrated an average of just a 1.1 mmHg drop in systolic blood pressure and 0.6 mmHg drop in diastolic blood pressure with salt restriction in healthy humans. This is basically going from 120/80 to 118.9/79.4, results that can easily be achieved in any number of ways.

However, the headlines in popular media outlets chimed out the bells that “Salt causes high blood pressure!” further perpetuating the myth in the public’s mind and within the medical community, while continuing to ignore highly contradictory results from other wide scale population studies, such as the Intersalt Study of 1988, a data-driven collection of results from 52 international research centers, that demonstrated that the highest salt-consuming individuals (up to 14g of salt per day) had lower blood pressure levels on average than people who consumed half of that amount.

The results of the 2004 government-funded Cochrane study, and ensuing media attention, become even more tenuous when you understand that the Cochrane Collaboration had conducted a study just one year prior, in 2003, reviewing 57 salt restriction trials, and concluded that “there is little evidence for long-term benefit from reducing salt intake.” A large study done in 1995 on 3000 people over 4 years led by Dr. Michael Alderman, and published in the journal Hypertension, demonstrated that individuals who ate less salt indeed actually had a higher prevalence of increased mortality rates than those who ate more salt. They also found that by adding more salt to their diet, the subjects had a 36% decrease in heart-related mortality events. Three years later, in 1998, the Alderman team published another set of findings on a 22 year long study they’d been conducting with over 11,000 people that showed a clear inverse relationship between salt intake and mortality.

In basic biochemistry, it’s well-understood that the breakdown of ATP to ADP + phosphate is required for the cell to use glucose and oxygen in order to maintain homeostatic functioning of the body’s core metabolic processes. This breakdown to ADP and phosphate cannot happen without the presence of adequate sodium in the fluid around the cell. The more sodium present in this fluid, the better the cell is able to increase its energy consumption, which leads to more CO2 production, fueling the metabolism properly and balancing the effects of intracellular calcium.

When unchecked by sodium, and the resulting lack of CO2 production, calcium can exert toxic effects on the cell, causing premature cell death. All of these compounds must be present in healthy levels in order to ensure the proper functioning and movement of ions through ion channels on the membrane.
 
Does Salt Really Cause High Blood Pressure? Think Again..."

I always thought it was fairly implausible that salt intake would make much difference to BP. The article seems to confirm that. It may of course be based - the last bit on ATP is pseudoscience so there is clearly an agenda behind it.

It tends to confirm my suspicion that salt intake really doesn't matter much unless you are stranded at sea or in a desert or something. Similarly, I doubt it makes much difference to symptoms of OI. We still do not have any useful trials I think although there may be one coming up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And hence continues the problem of studies that contradict each other, leading rational people to simply tune out. Good grief what a mess. No wonder people go to shady social media sources and Youtube rabbit holes that reinforce their beliefs. If authoritative sources are so confused, might as well be confidently wrong, since so are many experts anyway.


Estimated health effect, cost, and cost-effectiveness of mandating sodium benchmarks in Australia's packaged foods: a modelling study
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(24)00219-6/fulltext

Background
Excess dietary sodium is a leading cause of death and disability globally. Because packaged foods are a major source of sodium in many countries, including Australia, mandatory limits for sodium might improve population health. We aimed to estimate the long-term health and economic effect of mandating such thresholds in Australia.

Methods
We used a multiple cohort, proportional, multistate, life table model to simulate the effect of mandating either the WHO global sodium benchmarks or the currently non-mandatory Australian Healthy Food Partnership (HFP) sodium targets. We compared maintaining the current sodium intake status quo with intervention scenarios, using nationally representative data on dietary intake, sodium in packaged foods, and food sales volume. Blood pressure and disease burden data were obtained from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study. The effect of sodium reduction on blood pressure and disease risk was modelled on the basis of meta-analyses of randomised trials and cohort studies. Intervention and health-care costs were used to calculate the incremental cost per health-adjusted life-year (HALY) gained. Costs and HALYs were discounted annually at 3%.

Findings
Compared with the status quo intervention, mandating the WHO benchmarks could be cost saving over the first 10 years (AUD$223 [95% uncertainty interval 82–433] million saved), with 2743 (1677–3976) cardiovascular disease deaths and 43 971 (26 892–63 748) incident cardiovascular disease events averted, and 11 174 (6800–16 205) HALYs gained. Over the population's lifetime, the intervention was cost effective (100·0% probability). Mandating the HFP sodium targets was also estimated to be cost effective (100·0% probability), but with 29% of the health benefits compared with the WHO benchmarks.
 
Back
Top Bottom