Preprint Stigmatisation in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) - a scoping review, 2026, Vester et al

forestglip

Moderator
Staff member
Stigmatisation in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) - a scoping review

Patricia Vester, Stefanos Boudouroglou-Walter, Chantal Wieting, Jonas Schreyögg, Niklas Dammann, Annemarie Feißel, Katharina Piontek, Christine Blome

Objective
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a severe chronic, multi-systemic disease characterised by post-exertional malaise (PEM), cognitive impairments and pain. There is no curative treatment yet.

Stigmatisation is prevalent in several chronic illnesses, impacting patients’ quality of life and health outcomes. This review aims to examine the types and effects of stigmatisation experienced by individuals with ME/CFS.

Methods
This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic literature search was executed across six electronic databases, complemented by citation searching. The screening was performed independently by two researchers.

Results
We included 44 studies in this review. The most commonly assessed type of stigma was perceived stigma (n = 7); however, the majority of studies (n = 33) did not specify the type of stigma assessed.

Our findings showed that not only individuals with ME/CFS can be affected by stigmatisation, but also people in their social circles such as friends and family members. Stigmatisation was reported in various areas of life, but the most frequently identified issue were stigmatising experiences by healthcare professionals such as physicians.

Stigmatisation was found to contribute to poorer health outcomes, delays in diagnosis, and broader personal and societal consequences.

Conclusion
Individuals with ME/CFS can be profoundly affected by stigmatisation. Further research
should investigate experiences of children and (very) severely ill patients.

Research is also needed to develop strategies to reduce stigmatisation in healthcare and other settings and to improve the quality of care for m individuals with ME/CFS.

OSF | ResearchGate | PDF | Preprint
 
Last edited:
Stigmatization in ME/CFS being worse than in other diseases, including mental diagnoses such as depression, goes against the entire cognitive behavioral model.

One of the central ideas of this model is that ME/CFS patients somatize their life problems because they can't deal with the stigma associated with mental health diagnoses. But if stigma with ME/CFS is equally bad or even worse, then this reasoning doesn't make much sense IMHO.
 
Stigmatization in ME/CFS being worse than in other diseases, including mental diagnoses such as depression, goes against the entire cognitive behavioral model.

One of the central ideas of this model is that ME/CFS patients somatize their life problems because they can't deal with the stigma associated with mental health diagnoses. But if stigma with ME/CFS is equally bad or even worse, then this reasoning doesn't make much sense IMHO.
The obvious solution is to bin the label ME/CFS and embrace the less stigmatising FND or BDD labels. /s
 
Individuals with ME/CFS can be profoundly affected by stigmatisation. Further research should investigate experiences of children and (very) severely ill patients.
It's been known for decades. It's intentional. How much more of this can be tolerated and left to "more research"? Because the police will not police the police about things the police is convinced they have to do.

We don't need more research. All of this is a choice. It could end tomorrow. But show this to most physicians and they will dismiss, or worse, mock it. Because they perceive the "stigma" as just doing their job. Just like bias towards the stigmatizing models is perceived as a good thing. When vice is turned into a virtue, you get a whole damn lot of vice, showered with praise.

It's good that someone says it plainly, but it's still too polite about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom