Simon M
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I don't quite follow - almost all GWAS hits are to regulatory sequences, often some way from the gene (though on the same stretch of chromosome) not the protein coding part of the gene. Or do you mean a hit on a gene or its product that indirectly regulates the WASF3 gene? GWAS rarely identify a gene directly, but point to the key DNA sequences on a chromosome. It would presumably be possible to see if the DecodeME ones are anywhere near WASF3, or its regulators if known.I don't think it did, but maybe the association is between a regulatory sequence to WASF3 and ME/CFS, rather than WASF3 itself and ME/CFS.
A regulatory sequence affects how much of the gene product is made. That could lead to a tendency to overexpress WASF3 and be more likely to suffer the disruption of energy metabolism.
WASF3 could also be dysregulated because the proteins that regulate it are dysregulated.
None of the genes that DecodeME suggested are possibilities were hits to the protein coding regions.The idea is that researchers can look at DecodeME results to see if there is a link to genes of interest. Apologies if I have misunderstood.