I'm a bit leery of referring to ME/CFS as a "concept" Feels uncomfortably close to idea or belief, and can illness belief be far behind?
I think that may be stretching things. Diabetes is a concept, disabled people is a concept. I am trying to make the point that ME/CFS is useful as a syndrome concept - the nature of which I go on to describe
Suggestions for a better title are welcome.
Would "The Conceptualisation of ME/CFS" work better? To me that slightly shifts the framing to an active academic endeavour in the mind of the reader and medicine/science generally, and away from a suggestion of "abnormal beliefs in patients' heads". It also positions it as a dynamic, developing process, with even our description of core features such as PEM potentially yet to be refined as mechanisms are uncovered.
This may need clarifying a bit. People do talk about fatigue, but the difference is that they describe feeling exhausted and ill, the way people do with 'flu.
I would delete this sentence and expand the first part of this paragraph, because it is a key concept: many of us feel that our experience cannot be reduced to even a more severe version of 'normal fatigue'
Yes it's definitely fatigue, but it's FATIGUE! - intransigent, just varying in intensity and associated with a feeling of being poisoned - that something is fundamentally wrong at a cellular level. How I might imagine the early stages of being in a cyanide gas chamber might feel.