X thread on trap hypothesis
Can someone say whether this is just chat or has some valid scientific content?
Can someone say whether this is just chat or has some valid scientific content?
My apologies if this has already been posted somewhere! I couldn’t find it. Dr. Phair is a very clear speaker, and I appreciated hearing an update on this hypothesis that I was at least sort of able to follow as someone without the relevant background.
If you replace the x.com in the URL with nitter.net you'll be able to read the thread.Many of us can't see Twitter threads.
Can someone say whether this is just chat or has some valid scientific content?
Have the studies cited here been discussed before – and have they been validated or rejected?
Were there any ideas as to what scientists could test to prove or disprove the hypothesis?We had quite. lengthy discussion with Robert in a thread here. The itaconate idea is intriguing and the implication of alpha interferon makes some sense. However, inasmuch as it has been tested I think the results for the interferon were negative. That does not kill the theory but I don't think we have any strong evidence in favour of it.
Further tests ? I think you would have to ask Robert. I forget.Were there any ideas as to what scientists could test to prove or disprove the hypothesis?
Just on the genetic possibilities, Rob did mention that there were gene mutations that might predispose someone to problems with the itaconate shunt. He mentioned for example that there are common mutations in CLYBL, an enzyme that acts on citramalyl-CoA, that reduce its effectiveness.
which talk? it would be good to see the current version of rob's ideasRobert Phair also discussed today again as a part of the Itaconate shunt hypothesis talk.
which talk? it would be good to see the current version of rob's ideas
Presentation slides and Q&A responses [posted on Reddit]
Slides https://docs.google.com/document/d/17TEZXnUpoTX94BQnYTW8TDtd3BGYWWcXPln8IeKowv0/edit?usp=sharing
Question and Answer https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SOCPAfAcUlrBxmbY92Mkdoo7C3FDfCQKOaCKMmD_ApM/ed

I am watching the talk. The pictured experiment was done using mixed PBMC by the sound of it. If so, these observations cannot be attributed directly to mitochondrial or metabolic differences because differences in the composition of those mixed PBMC will confound these measurements (different types of cells comprising mixed PBMC can have very different metabolic states and preferences to each other). The proportions of these different cell types naturally shift between individuals and even within individuals depending on many common factors. Greatly so.Last years talk is here
And a support talk also from last year about a zebra fish model here
This years talk was at the Stanford Symposium 11 Sept 2026 and should be posted to the same YouTube channel.
Link to a copy of the slides is in this post (hosted on google share drive)
This was a key slide showing separation between 10 patients and 10 controls.
View attachment 34276