rvallee
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I hesitate to put "not a recommendation" because the article is so bad it almost makes some kind of other point than the PR campaign meant. When you have allies like Natural News and Rod Liddle...
It's completely pointless to read for the substance, it almost reads like a parody. I particularly like how some of the distorted information got morphed further, from Reuters' article trying to imply Sharpe and his colleagues were some of the few to the NN article basically saying that they are literally the only ones researching at all and keep getting harassed.
There is a confusing point about how it's "the pharma establishment" that is resisting Sharpe et al's work, which is just hard to reconcile with the whole "patient activists". It's not even clear who they think they're blaming here.
Basically it's about as all over the place as Sharpe's work is, you can conclude anything you prefer out of it and most of it is made-up.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03...tists-who-study-chronic-fatigue-syndrome.html (archive.is link: https://archive.fo/ainpk)
It's completely pointless to read for the substance, it almost reads like a parody. I particularly like how some of the distorted information got morphed further, from Reuters' article trying to imply Sharpe and his colleagues were some of the few to the NN article basically saying that they are literally the only ones researching at all and keep getting harassed.
There is a confusing point about how it's "the pharma establishment" that is resisting Sharpe et al's work, which is just hard to reconcile with the whole "patient activists". It's not even clear who they think they're blaming here.
Basically it's about as all over the place as Sharpe's work is, you can conclude anything you prefer out of it and most of it is made-up.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03...tists-who-study-chronic-fatigue-syndrome.html (archive.is link: https://archive.fo/ainpk)