Tuller/ Trial By Error: Hey Bristol, Where Is My Cease and Desist Letter?

Allele said:
PR companies are not interested in the truth. Their mission is branding and thus spin.
I have zero doubt she uses a PR consultant at this point; it also appears
she spontaneously generates "alternative facts" when under pressure. I'm very grateful Mr Tuller
is keeping the pressure on, despite her insistence on painting this as harassment.

I am so very tired of truth-tellers being made out to be villains for pointing out a corrupt narrative.
It seems we are in a dawning era of truth right now, and more power to the brave souls who are standing up to
the web of lies in all domains.
Click to expand...
I think a PR consultant would have advised her not to lie in public as knowing that whatever she does is picked apart, anything she can't back up will get highlighted and will damage her brand. She has probably read some stuff on how to market yourself and may have been helped with presention skills - engage the audience with personal stories, lots of eye contact, pause before saying something so that it has more effect, make the audience laugh by repeated cake references etc.
 
Sbag said:
I think a PR consultant would have advised her not to lie in public as knowing that whatever she does is picked apart, anything she can't back up will get highlighted and will damage her brand. She has probably read some stuff on how to market yourself and may have been helped with presention skills - engage the audience with personal stories, lots of eye contact, pause before saying something so that it has more effect, make the audience laugh by repeated cake references etc.
Click to expand...
Yes, the way she coopted the "reframing the narrative of ME" for her own agenda, along with the traits you mention are what make me certain she has consulted a PR person. I did then go on to say that she appears to be manufacturing alternative facts when she goes off-script.

However, on the general topic of PR and branding, there are few scruples in that world as far as truth in advertising. In fact in today's world, Branding is Newspeak for Lying About Shit.
 
Webdog said:
Tuller must be delighted. Every time he seems to be running out of material, Crawley graciously tosses him a new juicy story to run with.
Click to expand...

I bet that there were loads of problems with Wessely making false claims over the years that just were not recorded. Now everyone is walking around with a recording studio in their pockets it's much easier for someone like Crawley to get herself into trouble.
 
Liv aka Mrs Sowester said:
I think you're being a little over cautious on this one. As far as I'm aware anagrams have never been illegal.
Click to expand...
They are not, i just like to be very professional when going after institutions that will use every dirty trick against you. I aim to provide no ammunition, it makes her actions look extra bad when they can't even dig up any mud to try to sling.
I know its boring, its just how i think, i try to work 3-5 steps ahead
 
There does seem to be a growing expectation that researchers should do 'public engagement' type stuff. That must not be fun if your work is so poor that a large number of people are able to pick it apart in front of you. Please cease and desist the harassing questioning of research?!
 
Sbag said:
I think a PR consultant would have advised her not to lie in public as knowing that whatever she does is picked apart, anything she can't back up will get highlighted and will damage her brand. She has probably read some stuff on how to market yourself and may have been helped with presention skills - engage the audience with personal stories, lots of eye contact, pause before saying something so that it has more effect, make the audience laugh by repeated cake references etc.
Click to expand...


Ye maybe she didn't actually visit a CBT therapist she just did the CBT DVD.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom