Kitty
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
A bit of positive news: I have been put into the support group without a WCA.
That's great! Same thing happened to me, and in the end I was never assessed at all. Fingers crossed.
A bit of positive news: I have been put into the support group without a WCA.
Now, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is calling for disabled people to help inform the review by answering three key questions. This comes after an official call for evidence closed last month with 38,000 responses.
Minister for Social Security and Disability, Sir Stephen Timms, who is also co-chairing the review said: “Hearing from disabled people across the UK is vitally important to inform the Review. That is why we are co-producing this review with disabled people every step of the way — to make sure that PIP is truly fair and fit for the future. “I encourage any organisation that is able to host a workshop to do so, because we need to hear the views and lived experience of as many disabled people as possible.”
Official resources have been put together to help organisations and communities run the workshops where disabled people will be encouraged to share their views and experiences which will “shape” the review.
Three “key themes” will be questioned in the workshops:
Although the workshops have been designed for disabled people, organisations have been encouraged to adapt it for carers, advisors and other relevant parties who have experience with PIP.
- What PIP is for
- What it is like to apply for PIP
- How decisions for PIP are made
They make so many mistakes when writing letters — usually related to wrong dates — that I would question this. It's probably a typo. As noted above, there currently seems to be a mass programme of award extensions, so there's a good chance that this should read October 2028 or even later than that.I just got an letter extending my PIP award from September 2027, to October 2027.
Seems pointless, to say the least.
Oh, interesting! I'll try to give them a call.They make so many mistakes when writing letters — usually related to wrong dates — that I would question this. It's probably a typo. As noted above, there currently seems to be a mass programme of award extensions, so there's a good chance that this should read October 2028 or even later than that.
They'll probably tell you its right. The people on the phones are generally not that great. But I really doubt they'd extend an award by a month. It makes no sense.Oh, interesting! I'll try to give them a call.
They actually extended it by even less, when I checked the letters again!They'll probably tell you its right. The people on the phones are generally not that great. But I really doubt they'd extend an award by a month. It makes no sense.
Just tell them that an award extension of less than two weeks makes no sense and you think that it might be an error.Any tips?
I've seen award extensions of a year or so. In this latest wave they generally seem to be 2 or 3 years from what I've seen on X.Just tell them that an award extension of less than two weeks makes no sense and you think that it might be an error.
I eventually got through to a "Case Manager" who said they thought it "might be some kind of automatically generated letter" so she would investigate and phone me back...I've seen award extensions of a year or so. In this latest wave they generally seem to be 2 or 3 years from what I've seen on X.
I eventually got through to a "Case Manager" who said they thought it "might be some kind of automatically generated letter" so she would investigate and phone me back...
She also said I can just write "no change" for every single question on the review form and that would most likely mean the award is just re-awarded with no further admin... which would be nice!