Its fascinating all the useless research that is funded and allowed published
This sort of research might not be exciting, but I don't agree that it's useless.
I believe they already do this sort of study.Why though? Might as well do a study to check if patients enjoy eating food![]()
I think there will be avlot more over the next 18 months to feed into NICE guideline reviewIts fascinating all the useless research that is funded and allowed published
It might also help to bolster Esther Crawleys push for FITNET-NHS by showing that adolescents are more responsive to online 'help'.it provides reasons why use of internet groups can be helpful.
The authors elaborate on the advantages of the internet but they could elaborate more on the possible disadvantages by giving examples of misleading or inaccurate medical information and their possible deteriorate effect. Could it be a disadvantage that CFS/ME adolescents won’t give up their diagnosis and want to continue being a patient with CFS/ME, identifying themselves with their (internet) peers?
Where at least one Dutch clinician is at, believing CBT and the like can cure the illness.Methods
• Selection of participants, it seems important to select participants who are in different stages of disease: start, middle, end, cured.
REVIEWER Reviewer name: Andrew, Kennedy Reviewer Affiliation: Central Paediatrics I have no conflict of interest.
REVIEW RETURNED 27 - Oct - 2017
GENERAL COMMENTS
I enjoyed reading the paper but I feel the very small non randomised sample size severely restricts any broad implications from this sample being seen as representative for adolescents with CFS/ME. I believe t he paper needed a larger sample size, inclusive of severely affected individuals as well as those from non english speaking background and those that don't attend a specialist service. I believe the views of those who didn't self identify as using the inte rnet would have been useful in potentially helping to find out why they didn't and what they would be looking for in such sites.
I was quite surprised by the lack of any respondents describing any negative or unhelpful sites, apart from the odd 'dark' pat ient story, as this had been raised an potential concern in the introduction. Either they did and it was not reported or they didn't and found almost all sites helpful but this seems unlikely to be the case for all patients accessing health data on CFS/ME so agin suggests the sample size was too restrictive. I believe this study could and should be a basis for more expansive research in this area .
https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/bmjpo/2/1/e000299.reviewer-comments.pdf
PEER REVIEW HISTORY
[..]
VERSION 1 - REVIEW
REVIEWER
Reviewer name: van de Putte, Elise
Reviewer Affiliation: Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, General
Pediatrics
No competing interests
The authors elaborate on the advantages of the internet but they could elaborate more on the possible disadvantages by giving examples of misleading or inaccurate medical information and their possible deteriorate effect. Could it be a disadvantage that CFS/ME adolescents won’t give up their diagnosis and want to continue being a patient with CFS/ME, identifying themselves with their (internet) peers?
Where at least one Dutch clinician is at, believing CBT and the like can cure the illness.
Authors' reply said:We feel that it would be over-interpreting the data if we stated that internet use could mean that they would not want to give up their identity, as this is not something that participants discussed.
The authors elaborate on the advantages of the internet but they could elaborate more on the possible disadvantages by giving examples of misleading or inaccurate medical information and their possible deteriorate effect. Could it be a disadvantage that CFS/ME adolescents won’t give up their diagnosis and want to continue being a patient with CFS/ME, identifying themselves with their (internet) peers?
Wow, that's highly speculative and a strange thing to suggest given the nature of the study.