Wessely was unfortunately not mentioned. However a report at the time - the Clayton report, referred to in Hansard below clearly aims to minimise the effect of early issues and raises anxiety as an explanation in below (my bolding)

Hansard https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1989/jul/20/lowermoor-incident-group

"Mr. Freeman
The report of the Lowermoor incident health advisory group is being published today. The group was set up in January 1989 at my request to provide independent expert advice to the Cornwall and Isles of Scilly district health authority on the implications for the health of the population in the Camelford area following the contamination of their drinking water in July 1988. Copies of the report have been sent to the Department of Health and to the Department of the Environment, and I am placing copies in the Library. I am grateful to Dame Barbara Clayton and her colleagues for their very thoughtful and authoritative report.

Hansard: https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1989/jul/20/lowermoor-incident-group

"The Government welcome the group's advice that no long-term effects on health are expected. The group's main findings are that:

(i) early symptoms, which were mostly gastrointestinal disturbances, rashes and mouth ulcers and which appeared to be mostly mild and short-lived, can most probably be attributed to the incident. Other causes such as viral infections cannot be discounted for some of the cases.
(ii) it is not possible to attribute the very real current health complaints to the toxic effects of the incident, except insofar as they are the consequence of the sustained anxiety naturally felt by many people. A number of factors have contributed to this anxiety, particularly in relation to long-term effects, and these are addressed in the report."
Hansard https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1989/jul/20/lowermoor-incident-group"

I cannot find the full report, nor who the other authors were. In the film there is a brief shot of 4 people, including Clayton -but I don't know who the others were.

However I know how brilliant the S4ME sleuths are at finding relevant info.
Did they in their world of non dualism give any regard to the fact that aluminium poisoning itself might increase propensity to anxiety whether as part of specific mechanisms or by inducing stress of general dysfunction and the experience thereof.
 
Did they in their world of non dualism give any regard to the fact that aluminium poisoning itself might increase propensity to anxiety whether as part of specific mechanisms or by inducing stress of general dysfunction and the experience thereof.
Though completely brazen in this and other instances ( Iranian schoolgirls, Heathrow chemical incident ....)
Why spoil a good run ( particularly if you're female)
It's the diagnosis of first resort.

B12 deficiency - anxiety
POTS - anxiety
Sleep issues - anxiety
Thyroid - anxiety

Etc
 
Clayton report
Years ago I obtained copies of the Clayton reports on Camelford (media coverage usually refers to the "Clayton report", but there were actually two) - I wondered if they were of some relevance given the psychobehaviouralists' interest in the event. They were only available in hard-copy at the time I borrowed them - I had them scanned and have PDF copies. It's been a very long time since I looked at them. They're too large to upload as attachments to the forum and I'm uncertain of the copyright status, but if any regular member here has a serious interest, my DMs are open. May take me a few days to respond.

(Few seem interested in either the history of ME or of the emergence of psychosomatics, but, in case there's any interest, I also have a number of other scanned/PDFised copies of other things only available in hard copy - off the top of my head: the 1980s Streeten study that we thought was used to inform the 30 bpm criteria for POTS; some texts by Mansel Aylward; a long out of print book written by the founder of ANZMES; a copy of the full writeup of the Showalter-Wessely debate at the RCP in the mid 1990s; the Linbury Trust's guidebook to the 1990s ME research they funded, ...)
 
(Few seem interested in either the history of ME or of the emergence of psychosomatics, but, in case there's any interest, I also have a number of other scanned/PDFised copies of other things only available in hard copy - off the top of my head: the 1980s Streeten study that we thought was used to inform the 30 bpm criteria for POTS; some texts by Mansel Aylward; a long out of print book written by the founder of ANZMES; a copy of the full writeup of the Showalter-Wessely debate at the RCP in the mid 1990s; the Linbury Trust's guidebook to the 1990s ME research they funded, ...)
@Arvo (who definitely is interested in the history of ME and the emergence of psychosomatics), these resources may be useful?
 
@Arvo (who definitely is interested in the history of ME and the emergence of psychosomatics), these resources may be useful?
Yes, please!
Though the topic of these documents sound somewhat outside those I'm mainly focusing on in my writing, they fall right in my collection period, and will probably shed additional light on events. And I'm interested in collecting, bringing together and preserving any primary sources regarding the first phase of the psychiatric appropriation of ME so they can be used for study by me and others.

I'll DM you @Nightsong
 
Back
Top Bottom