Search results

That has been my concern with some of the Unrest coverage I've caught.

Thanks Andy. Great stuff. The role of the SMC in this whole saga has been pretty consistently disgraceful. Good to see this getting some more attention. It's amazing to me that they've been able to go on playing the same game, even as the wider academic community comes to recognise that there...

I hadn't even thought of anything like that. Probably should have done so before casually chucking names out.

David Tuller? Alem Matthees?

Here's the Retraction Watch coverage: http://retractionwatch.com/2017/12/05/definitely-embarrassing-nobel-laureate-retracts-non-reproducible-paper-nature-journal/

Good work. Thank you.

LOL - I tend to associate 'complex' with CFS dodginess! Funny how the years of quackery and prejudice we've experience has meant many of us now have these concerns and associations that would probably seem like loopy paranoia to someone new to the field. Both 'spectrum' and 'complex' are words...

Fingers crossed. We lost a couple of decades to just lumping everyone together.

I downloaded a copy and I think that there's still a live link somewhere in this thread too.

11 days ago, still no videos up. I wonder what's going on with them. Are we going to get a digitally altered video, with Crawley not saying what she said?!

Or $250 if they fail to cash out until after the bubble bursts...

It could be TEDx Bristol and TEDx Bristol University are totally different events, or they could be linked in some way? No idea. TEDx Bristol adopting this 'Dare to Disrupt' slogan while trying to hide critical comments on social media is so embarrassing. What must the people doing this think...

For anyone interested, there's introductory info on the weighting of studies in meta analyses here (found via google, so sorry if it's BS): https://www.meta-analysis.com/downloads/Meta%20Analysis%20Fixed%20vs%20Random%20effects.pdf I think I understand it more... but also, it's added a whole...

Go on academy members, this is the year to use some tokenism to show you're not sexist or racist or ableist... and you can do it with an award that most of you don't even care about!

Please don't take this as a request for you to put work into writing out anything extensive, but if anything in particular strikes you it would be good to hear about it. I've not been following this inquiry, but the bits that I do see mentioned are often interesting.

Also lots of info at @Dx Revision Watch 's site. https://meagenda.wordpress.com/category/lightning-process-smile-study/ I'd just been reading this annoying old stuff from Action for ME on SMILE...

They sent this 9 days ago:

Looks like they're almost all missing for me. That's not a good sign. "Dare to Disrupt"... not in that way!

I was just reading, via google translate, this silly paper on CFS [unsure whether this should be a new thread, I thought probably not worth it but others may disagree]: Chronic fatigue syndrome in general practice By Kirsti Malterud and Hanne Hollnagel...

Ah... yes, that does make it a play more likely to pay off. Good thinking! People from outside the UK can find our Establishment absurd... or be keen to fit in with it. Shame Brady seems to be so poor on Crawley. I think Lewandowsky is at Bristol too, and he's another academic from outside of...