Robert 1973
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
This is very good and very well written. I particularly like the tone. We all have to try so hard to moderate our language and bend over backwards to seem reasonable because of the lies and stereotypes that have been propagated about people with ME, and Naomi has got it spot on with this in my view. I hope doctors and others will take heed of the message.
One minor observation. Naomi writes:
Although I agree with Naomi’s message, I also think it’s important to emphasise that even with the best advice and care, the prognosis is poor, and the need for diagnostic tests and effective treatments is urgent.
I’ve often wondered if my condition would be significantly different now if I had been given better advice at the beginning. The quality of my life would certainly have been better. I would certainly have suffered less, both physically and mentally, but I don’t know if it would have affected my level of disability.
Although doing too much makes me worse, one of the difficulties for me has alsways been that staying within my threshold rarely makes me feel much better. So even when people were saying “don’t do too much,” I still found it hard not to push myself because I wasn’t noticing any positive effect of resting, and I didn’t know if the advice was correct or not.
If the physiology was understood, and someone had been able to explain what was wrong with me and what the negative effects of exertion would be and why, it would have been much easier to heed the advice.
Thanks again to Naomi for writing this positive and helpful article.
One minor observation. Naomi writes:
I fully agree with the need for doctors to listen etc. but I don’t think we know enough about ME/CFS to know what the course of anyone’s illness would have been if they had been treated differently. Yes, the quality of all our lives would have have been improved if we had not been mistreated, but I don’t think we can say with confidence that anyone’s body would have been able to heal or that anyone would have been prevented from being permanently disabled.All it would have taken was for someone to listen – really listen – and to respect my perspective as one that could and should be trusted. Had this happened, the course of my illness would have been very different. I would have received treatment that was appropriate to my needs, and which allowed my body the chance to gently heal, rather than being forced into activity that only worsened my suffering and left me permanently disabled.
Although I agree with Naomi’s message, I also think it’s important to emphasise that even with the best advice and care, the prognosis is poor, and the need for diagnostic tests and effective treatments is urgent.
I’ve often wondered if my condition would be significantly different now if I had been given better advice at the beginning. The quality of my life would certainly have been better. I would certainly have suffered less, both physically and mentally, but I don’t know if it would have affected my level of disability.
Although doing too much makes me worse, one of the difficulties for me has alsways been that staying within my threshold rarely makes me feel much better. So even when people were saying “don’t do too much,” I still found it hard not to push myself because I wasn’t noticing any positive effect of resting, and I didn’t know if the advice was correct or not.
If the physiology was understood, and someone had been able to explain what was wrong with me and what the negative effects of exertion would be and why, it would have been much easier to heed the advice.
Thanks again to Naomi for writing this positive and helpful article.