ryanc97
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Well, that assumes patients have no minds of their own and cannot evaluate what is said to them.The idea is not to give medical advice here. I think we have good reasons for that.
By advice I mean perspectives.
Well, that assumes patients have no minds of their own and cannot evaluate what is said to them.The idea is not to give medical advice here. I think we have good reasons for that.
Well, that assumes patients have no minds of their own and cannot evaluate what is said to them.
I just want to get some perspectives. At the end of the day you have to think and decide for yourself.No it does not. It is designed to protect vulnerable individuals from overenthusiasm by others.
The forum rules do not allow asking for or giving medical adviceWell, that assumes patients have no minds of their own and cannot evaluate what is said to them.
By advice I mean perspectives.
...but they may not diagnose or recommend treatments to each other, nor request such diagnoses or recommendations
A doctor I have been seeing, who has treated ME/CFS for a quite a while, asked me if it "wore off". That's as anectodal as it gets.As many patients anecdotally report that the effects of Aripiprazole/Abilify do wear off after some time, I wondered if there's any comments in scientific literature or even just in talks or other oublic statements about that from the Drs who prescribe this medication.
So is there any acknowledgment of these experience among treating Drs. and/or researchers? Especially now that they're conducting this new study on the subject in Germany, it would be important to examine this phenomenon as well.
It pooped out then tried a mini break of two months but it didnt work as the first time (wonderfull effects, im severe and i could eat with my family in a sofa, watch tv, work for two hours and above all did 1500 steps a day).Extremely anecdotal: To date, I have not tried LDA, but did see a doctor who recommended it and had a number of other patients taking it. Some time back, when he first mentioned it, I asked him about the potential for the drug to stop working (if indeed it did anything at all) and he was confident that with a sufficiently slow and cautious approach this could be avoided. For a number of reasons, I declined to try it at that time. A year later it was mentioned again, but apparently his experience had changed as he then stated that it "frequently" only works for a limited time. His recommendation had shifted to memantine.
Anecdotal reports are always unreliable but I do get an impression that aripiprazole may be helping some people with ME/CFS. This would of course fit perfectly with a view of the disease steering towards dopamine D2 receptor involvement. I think it is very plausible that if this is the right track there might be a limited subset of responders. In Parkinson's there is only a subset of responders to dopamine-targeting drugs but the pathology is almost certainly the same for all. In RA there is only a subset that responds well to TNF blockade despite TNF being involved in all cases.
The answer here is not, I think, to try to select out a responder subset in advance, because it is likely to be very hard to predict. The answer is to include everyone with disease and do a large enough trial to pick up maybe 30% responders. That is not hard. The reason why trials have failed so far is almost certainly that the agent is irrelevant and there are no responders beyond 'placebo'.
So an aripiprazole trial in people just with CCC ME/CFS makes a lot of sense.
I wonder if a trial proposal was turned down because of poor design or maybe misguided justification. An intriguing thing about aripiprazole is that, as a drug for psychiatric conditions, it might be expected to held in suspicion by people with ME/CFS. The fact that it has come through as something for which there is enthusiasm may be significant. It would make sense if it is working on dopamine receptors, which can be relevant both to psychiatric conditions and to neurological conditions like PD.
There is not really much debate over whether it works or not: yes, it clearly works for a subgroup of patients.
I knew you were going to reply with that, and scientifically speaking, you are right.You may believe that and you may be right. However, we know how unreliable such reports are, in general, so for those of us who have not personally experienced an improvement in ME/CFS the claim has to be taken as on a par with such a claim about homeopathy or LDN or Brain Retraining. I agree that a trial is justified. But until then, the debate, or at least the uncertainty, must continue.
In light of what seems (based merely on anecdotal information from pwME) like an increased recent interest in memantine, and the suggestion that memantine, particularly low dose memantine, may work to prevent or slow tolerance to other drugs (notably opiods), I wonder if there are any out there in the ME community who have been on both concurrently? Given the widespread reports of tachyphylaxis with LDA, this seems like it might be worth exploring (all the better if memantine should prove have some positive effect on its own, there are a few scattered positive reports online, but nothing that seems truly extraordinary).