Is 9 patients and 9 controls an unusually small study or are studies often this small? Sorry if this is a beyond basic question..
I know nothing about this but I would speculate they did some tests and found some unusual results. So then they decided to formalise their testing by doing this small but official study.Is 9 patients and 9 controls an unusually small study or are studies often this small? Sorry if this is a beyond basic question..
A few errors and oddities (at least to me).
Well, I'll just wait it out then...
Not that they impact on what they seem to have found but it doesn't look great.
https://www.meassociation.org.uk/20...ced-ability-to-change-shape-04-december-2018/“These are clearly interesting preliminary findings from America that could also link in with the research on red blood cell shape that was published by Dr Les Simpson in New Zealand many years ago.”
“The number of recruits is clearly very small. So, we will need to have results from much larger numbers of people with ME/CFS (in various stages of illness and of differing illness severities) and confirmatory results from other independent research groups.”
“Also, I think we would need to see comparisons made with other groups of individuals (e.g. people with multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, depression and sedentary populations) before coming to any firm conclusions about the validity of this finding and its possible use as a diagnostic biomarker for ME/CFS.”
Dr Charles Shepherd, Hon. Medical Adviser, ME Association.
How many years will that take....
Leslie O Simpson is the pioneer of this theory. He wrote a book on red blood cell deformability and capillary restriction in ME together with Nancy Blake. It’s called Ramsay’s Disease. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (Me) and the Unfortunate Creation of 'Cfs'(2013).Les Simpson’s work on red blood cell lack of deformability and ME from the 80/90s.
I must say i am missing @Jonathan Edwards' input on these things. (assuming i understand why he's not around but i still miss his input)
The thing that seems most odd is the bit saying they measured red cells moving at 4000fps, which is nearly four times the speed of sound in my book!
We recorded the movement of the cells at high speed (4000 fps)
Yes I agree it likely refers to recording speed. So 4000 fps will be very fast, presumably so they can look at what is happening greatly slowed down.It will be Frames Per Second (is my assumption anyway), although admittedly it's not terribly clear
Interesting computer simulation of RBCs moving through a retina capillary. Gives a sense of the deformation that goes on.
How exciting Jonathan, it's somewhere i have always wanted to go, those boabab trees look amazing.Sorry to have been in Madagascar for three weeks.
I suspect that the authors may not have much insight into the serious risk of confounding factors like taking analgesics or shifts in red cell turnover related to altered levels of activity.
There was a comment upthread I think, about how the deformation of the blood cells dramatically increases the contact area between the red blood cells and the capillary walls, and therefore the opportunity for molecule exchange, compared to what would happen if the red blood cells were rigid little concave things.is this deformation an important part of how red blood cells do what they need to do?
So could this reduced contact with the capillary wall partially contribute to the reduction in oxygen extraction in skeletal muscle that Systrom has observed?There was a comment upthread I think, about how the deformation of the blood cells dramatically increases the contact area between the red blood cells and the capillary walls, and therefore the opportunity for molecule exchange, compared to what would happen if the red blood cells were rigid little concave things.