large donner
Guest
@Jonathan Edwards
Do you think that the Oxford criteria has a better potential to pickup up people who fit multiple criterias or a small subset of people within a syndrome?
Surely if it only picks up a smaller subset of people within a syndrome a panel of doctors/interested parties should be presented with that to show that using recommendations from a trial on that subset is foolish as an overal guideline for a patient population.
There's no reason not to present every other argument alongside that but why would you leave that obvious statement out?
This argument has already worked with the CDC and the IOM alongside the other ones you are proposing.
No one is saying one has to say 'the BPS crowd deliberately fiddled things'.
Do you think that the Oxford criteria has a better potential to pickup up people who fit multiple criterias or a small subset of people within a syndrome?
Surely if it only picks up a smaller subset of people within a syndrome a panel of doctors/interested parties should be presented with that to show that using recommendations from a trial on that subset is foolish as an overal guideline for a patient population.
There's no reason not to present every other argument alongside that but why would you leave that obvious statement out?
This argument has already worked with the CDC and the IOM alongside the other ones you are proposing.
No one is saying one has to say 'the BPS crowd deliberately fiddled things'.
Last edited: