Thanks MEMargeAnother great video Adam and thanks to John for your work as well
another great video.
My only observation is no mention of Esther Crawley; particularly in relation to 'harassment', and there being no evidence of it following FOI to Bristol, and the supposed cease and desist letter to DT, and who can forget the TEDx talk (I think it was that one anyway) where she used the mock threatening letter and made out it had been sent to her.
Congrats!The #MECFS Medical Scandal Explainer video has just hit 100,000 views on YouTube.
Given that I've only got a small channel, I think this shows there is significant interest in the topic.
Thanks TrishWow, that's amazing. Well done.
I’ve just checked and it’s getting about 1200 views a day atm. Looks like the algorithm has picked it up again. I think it was getting about 300 before.Just noticed the video already has 170k views!
Congrats Adam on reaching so many views!
Was only able to skim your text but it looked good. It's a bit long for newbies so perhaps some events (regarding the PACE trial for example) could be left out. On the other hand, it could also be useful for newcomers to have a comprehensive overview of what happened.
Thanks, TrishVery good, Adam. Thank you for your work.
Thanks, Sean,Thanks for this, @Adam pwme . Good to have it laid out clearly.
Some points from memory, will need checking:
Wessely has been either on the Science Media Centre's board of governors (or whatever they are called), or a medical adviser to it, since its inception. Even if he ever held no formal role he clearly has had and continues to have a major informal influence over its views and positions.
He played a role in creating the John Maddox award.
Wessely not only received the John Maddox award, he was given the inaugural award, usually regarded as a particularly prestigious honour. The prize was also later awarded to Esther Crawley.