New Video: The PACE trial - Politics

The defining symptom of ME is that even minimal exertion can cause a crash (flare in symptoms) for days/months/weeks. In severe cases it can cause relapses and patients become significantly more disabled for months/years; some never recover. Multiple surveys have consistently shown that Graded Exercise makes over 50% of patients worse [1].

The PACE trial was published in 2011 and was widely reported in the media as a success, with headlines like "Exercise and positivity ‘can overcome ME" [2]. Patients made numerous freedom of information requests for the data but
were refused. After a long legal battle, some of the data was released [3].

The authors also refused to share the data with other researchers. An ‘Expression of Concern’ was added to a related paper after they broke the journals data sharing policy [4].

The data was reanalysed using the authors original protocol and found the claim that patients can recover is “not justified by the
data” and “highly misleading” [5].

The Journal of Health Psychology dedicated an entire issue to understand the many problems with the PACE trial and described it as a “textbook example of a poorly done trial” [6]. 80 charities, 10 MPs and over 100 academics signed an open letter to the Lancet in 2018 requesting an independent re-analysis of the trial [7]. The Lancet failed to respond.

“Researchers have put massive effort into discrediting the whole community and rallying other researchers to their defense. It’s been a collective ad hominem attack” [8]. “The patient community has been publicly vilified by the trial authors and colleagues but they have turned out to be right" [9]. Claims of harassment made by the PACE authors were found to be “grossly exaggerated” in court [3].

The Science Media Centre (SMC) provides science information to the media in the UK. The SMC are “proactive”, they “changed the whole course of coverage” on pandemic swine flu in 2009 [10]. One of the most influential researchers in ME/CFS sat on the advisory committee and the board of governors of the SMC and was involved in the PACE trial [11, 12].

The SMC has helped place articles about harassment in the press. They ‘gave’ the
original story to the BBC in 2011 [13] and released an ‘inaccurate’ factsheet the day before a reanalysis paper was published [14].

The behaviour of one of the PACE authors was criticised in parliament after he emailed the organiser of a debate about the PACE trial [15].

[1] https://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/hWSxVIBTzDtqisvafkhE/full
[2] https://meassociation.org.uk/2015/1...t-about-the-daily-telegraph-11-december-2015/
[3] https://www.centreforwelfarereform.org/news/major-breaktn-pace-trial/00296.html
[4] https://meassociation.org.uk/2017/0...trial-cost-effectiveness-analysis-2-may-2017/
[5] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21641846.2017.1259724
[6] https://meassociation.org.uk/2017/0...ial-introduction-by-david-marks-31-july-2017/
[7] https://www.virology.ws/2018/08/13/trial-by-error-open-letter-to-the-lancet-version-3-0/
[8] https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/20...-the-me-cfs-exercise-dispute-matters-so-much/
[9] https://www.parliament.scot/S5_PublicPetitionsCommittee/Submissions 2018/PE1690_F.pdf
[10] SMC promotional video 5 mins 46 & 8 mins 26
[11] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Wessely+S[Author]+"chronic+fatigue+syndrome"
[12] https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Simon_Wessely
[13] http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/w...arch-function-at-the-Science-Media-Centre.pdf
[14] https://meassociation.org.uk/2018/0...place-your-factsheet-on-cfs-me-05-april-2018/
[15] https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commo...4E35-A83B-49FEF0D6074F/METreatmentAndResearch
 
Damn, that was so good. Great flow to link the various details. In the end this is the most significant part: this disease has been completely politicized. Had it not been politicized this nonsense would have barely made a splash. People like Wessely, White, Aylward, Gerada, Fink, people who did more medical politics than actual medicine have won this by going full political and bullying through an ideology aligned with the politics of austerity. They promised savings that were complete fantasy and now escalation of commitment has made backtracking impossible.

It's true that this will end up being the biggest medical scandal of the century at some point, but PACE is only one part of this. The entire BPS ideology is the merger of politics and medicine, built on complete disregard for the actual mission of medicine of helping the sick.
 
Are the claims of harassment still being made after the FOI tribunal said that they were grossly exaggerated?

Not necessarily by the people who were the originators of those words but they are still being quoted in the press. As recently as within the past few weeks I saw here on S4ME a screen capture of a newspaper article saying as much.

ETA: and they never get corrected. And I'm sure those responsible for originating the idea are well aware.
 
Are the claims of harassment still being made after the FOI tribunal said that they were grossly exaggerated?

Michael Sharpe made numerous claims of harrasment, on a guardian podcast and on the BBC Today Programme and in some news articles, it was over a year ago, but after the tribunal. I saw it mentioned in a news article last week too which prompted me to finish the video.
 
Are the claims of harassment still being made after the FOI tribunal said that they were grossly exaggerated?
The Financial Times repeated them in a recent article.

And of course there's the Reuters hit piece from last year that got many derivative articles all parroting the lie. And pretty sure it got a mention in the Swedish (?) series by Afondablet or something like that.
 
Thank you Adam. A great and important piece of work.

I enjoyed rereading some of the references too.

Am I right in remembering that it is 4 years today since the Information Commissioner's Tribunal ( ?Upper Tribunal) announced that the data should be partially released? What a day for pwme! And thanks to Alem Matthees.

That decision changed the story around Pace.
 
Back
Top Bottom