Stuff: Woman with long Covid wants physiotherapy to be more accessible for all A pretty good 80% and good to see a recovery trajectory Linking to — Statement about ME/CFS and Exercise: Prepared for Health Care Providers, Welfare Assessors, and Insurance Assessors by Dr Lynette Hodges, 2nd September 2021
Tapanui Flu A thread about the outbreak of ME/CFS-like illness in New Zealand. Interesting to see the assertion that Otago and specifically the small town of Otago was not the only place that had an outbreak, and that there were outbreaks across New Zealand around 1983.
On Gez: I didn't take notes. I thought it started rather badly, with the suggestion that Long covid hits active people preferentially, people who have pushed themselves and worked very hard. Gez referred to a survey he did with 2000 people, noting that the vast majority of them had been active and stressed. But, before he got Long covid, he ran marathons and did You Tube videos about running. I'm thinking his sample selection was rather biased. I'm pretty sure the active high achieving people are the ones who tend to be loud about getting Long covid. They are used to being listened to, and have high achieving friends to help them. Whereas you don't hear nearly as much from the people who just plodded through life. So, it's easy to get a skewed impression. I mean, who knows, the idea might be correct, but making assumptions about risk factors based on who ends up in interviews could easily lead to research and policy being based on incorrect ideas. That led on to a suggestion that people get stuck in a fight or flight situation, which revs upon the immune system. So, was suggested that treatments need to calm the immune system down. Anyway, there was good stuff, probably mostly good stuff. Gez was particularly good on exercise not being curative, and making some people worse - he specifically mentioned graded exercise therapy as not being good. PEM was explained, the overlap with ME/CFS. It was mentioned that there is no cure, although acupuncture and other things got mentioned as things that help some people. I guess I would have got a lot things wrong if I had been interviewed a couple or a few years into my illness, and probably would even now, so it's a bit harsh to criticise someone who sticks their neck out and turns up to be interviewed. On balance, I think it was a helpful interview.
I agree @Hutan. I thought there was a little too much quarter given with anxiety and mind-body, and it sounded as if "nervous system" was promoted above immune pathology at times, whereas I think the evidence points to the inverse (albeit allowing for feedback/augmentation). But overall I felt the interview was helpful. Completely agree about the skewed sample of fit people, for the reasons you give. When I look at our local FB group, yes there are plenty of people who ranged from healthy/fit to elite athletes, but there were also people who were clearly not that demographic at all. However, in terms of public education I hope that hearing the experience that many fit people had mild disease, went immediately back to exercise and then came a cropper, strongly counters the BPS fantasy of deconditioning and abnormal illness beliefs.
Good article published on Thursday, 3rd August by Alice O'Connell “They Said it Was Menopause – It Was Long Covid”. The Impact & Scale of Long Covid & How NZ Women Are Being Gas Lit Before Getting Answers https://capsulenz.com/be/long-covid-gaslit/
I think being told repeatedly since almost the start of the pandemic that this doesn't happen, and if it does it's not to "healthy, active, fit" people makes some want to make it clear that it absolutely does. I guess for many it's a new experience of not being believed, and even those of us with clear evidence of our active lifestyle are being told we are/have been lazy and inactive based on the logic that otherwise we wouldn't have got ME. Only in the last week I've been told ME is caused by lack of motivation and low sense of accomplishment (and then we just give up on life > manifests as fatigue and if the person had know of the concept of deconditioned I'm sure they'd have thrown that in..). Of course I then pointed out many (I'd say most) have motivations to do something. And many have had what would otherwise be called accomplished life before getting ill. Becoming ill as a teen I wouldn't say I have, but I'm one of the lucky ones that have been able to get an education, and my level of accomplishment following this would not be called "low". I'm still ill. Yes, for some of the more inactive people I know, I've wondered how they would notice ME in their daily life. Especially if they got a milder grade like me. My fitbit tells me I've averaged ~4000 steps the last year, the year before that it was ~5000. I think plenty of healthy albeit inactive people can have this level of activity.
That's quite a problematic article reflecting an even more problematic medical system. First there is a "brilliant" cardiologist who believes that Long covid is the same as POTS, and can be fixed So, Sarah has been following these recommendations for over 11 months and has the brilliant cardiologist got things under control? No. It's not just the brilliant cardiologist, there are wonderful physiotherapists and occupational therapists: The last part of the article is mostly an advertisement for cardio-respiratory physiotherapists and completely unevidenced breathing exercises. In a health care system so cash-strapped that people aren't getting treated in a timely way for basic things were the treatment actually helps, money is being wasted on unevidenced breathing exercises. And a whole lot of people with Long Covid will be spending money and energy and time on ineffective therapies, and not yet understanding that actually there are no treatments.
And having been told by healthcare professionals they will get better, there is a chance they will become aggressive to anyone who says anything else.
I know a medical professional who is doing the 2 hour Lightning Process Training for health professionals with Jenny Oliver at the GPCME South on Thursday, 10th Aug so that they are informed about what is being offered to people with ME/CFS. Can anyone recommend any articles /threads that would be good background reading to the attendee to help them participate in any discussion at the training workshop? Or at least attend with their eyes wide open. If they felt comfortable to do so, what would be good questions for them to raise about the evidence and safety of this programme being offered to anyone, but particularly those with ME/CFS ? Have questions to LP trainers been discussed anywhere in this forum? I haven't spotted it yet. (I have found the 'Lightning Process - discussion thread' but haven't read much of the 11 pages. https://s4me.info/threads/lightning-process-discussion-thread.5809 ) Possible questions to be asked internally or at the training... Are patients medically assessed prior to participating in the LP programme to determine risks of their participation? For pwME, what advice is provided to ensure that they do not trigger post-exertional malaise and cause a long-term reduction in their functionality through implementing the techniques taught on the programme? What mechanism does the trainer consider generates the change in physiological symptoms? What evidence is there for this? For people who do not obtain improved health as a result of the LP programme, or worse yet, get worse, what support is offered to them to rebalance their mental health after being told that if they just believe they have control of their symptoms (through the techniques)? ? ***** Discussion of this question has been moved to: Needed: concise(!) resources to brief people on problems with LP
Just replied in the LC in the media thread to a youtube vid of his which was imo a load of bollocks. I don't know if it's appropriate to start this discussion in two threads on this forum or if I should just link the other discussion. It was him interviewing a Dr. about autonomic conditioning.
That discussion has been moved here: https://www.s4me.info/threads/usa-mount-sinai-pacs-clinic-and-dr-putrino.23051/page-3#post-487849
Long Covid’s ‘missing thousands’ in NZ New Zealand may have 100,000-150,000 people affected by Long Covid and ME, and of those, 85 percent will be moderately to very severely affected and needing significant support Warren Tate Long Covid's 'Missing Thousands' In NZ | Newsroom
The Select Committee has made its recommendations. Probably as good as could have been hoped for. Question is, will it lead to meaningful action. An earlier petition years ago also won the support of the Select Committee but no change was ever made as a result Full Select Committee report can be downloaded here
Anna Brooks has invited Martin Krater to speak at this weekend's flow cytology conference in Queenstown. Also doing a lecture at University of Auckland on Friday (not open access I believe).
Press release: ANZMES welcomes HSC recommendations for improved access to disability services for people with ME/CFS Home › Health Contributor: Fuseworks MediaFuseworks Media Tuesday, 22 August, 2023 - 12:14 ANZMES, the National Advisory on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), has welcomed the Health Select Committee’s (HSC) response to its petition delivered in September 2022, calling on the Government to reclassify ME as a disability. The Health Select Committee presented its report to parliament on 17th August 2023, sending a strong message acknowledging ANZMES petition to reclassify ME - also known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) - as a disability with the recommendation that eligibility criteria for disability services be amended. The 10 page HSC Report recommends that the Government take note stating "we understand that ME/CFS meets the Government’s definition of a disability. We therefore, encourage Whaikaha to consider amending its eligibility criteria to enable people with ME/CFS to access Whaikaha-funded disability support services." Continues at: http://www.voxy.co.nz/health/5/420846
A brief item on Radio New Zealand https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/prog...018904918/nz-s-only-long-covid-clinic-to-shut It has a GP saying that they are seeing a lot of Long Covid patients and they don't know what to do with them and that they aren't funded to look after them. (There is a capitation fee that GPs get, so they don't want high maintenance patients.). The national health agency is saying that it won't be providing any specialist services and that GPs can look after people with Long Covid. On the other hand, there's the question of how much use any specialist service is, other than allowing GPs to wash their hands of time-consuming patients and making the patients feel as though someone cares. The Christchurch service had occupational therapists and respiratory physiotherapists and sounds to have been focused on retraining people how to breathe. So, the absence of largely ineffective clinics isn't necessarily a bad thing, as it may help make both patients and GPs to be louder about the problem of no useful treatment.
My UK LC is also focusing on breathing. Every single patient referred to the breathing physio has been diagnosed with disordered breathing. I have already been through this in the 1990s so I played along for a while. Then I disputed it and showed I knew how to do the exercises already.and could draw a breath. Examination