I do get a little bit frustrated seeing Polybio get all this money just falling into their laps whilst brilliant MECFS researchers are having to go around hat in hand begging for funding.$10M is a massive donation! I hope they spend it wisely.
They’ve got an attractive sales pitch from the perspective of outsiders, and people with experience and connections from private equity and tech.I do get a little bit frustrated seeing Polybio get all this money just falling into their laps whilst brilliant MECFS researchers are having to go around hat in hand begging for funding.
They don't seem to do a lot of immune research that doesn't revolve around viral persistence, which imo is almost certainly a dead end.
I do wonder if it would be possible to get to the point of visibility where Edinburgh or Fluge and Mella are getting donations approaching this magnitude. After all the reality is they are much more likely to get to the bottom of this than the viral persistance people, if only we could persuade rich relatives of pwME/LC of this fact.
This is the thing that I'm wondering is how do we pitch SequenceME or F&Ms studies or the other good underfunded stuff so that these people see the potential for a breakthrough.They’ve got an attractive sales pitch from the perspective of outsiders, and people with experience and connections from private equity and tech.
Connections and marketing? E.g. I don't remember ever seeing F&M mentioned in LC groups although a lot of people have ME/CFS diagnosis, too. DecodeME is widely known in the community but I'm not convinced people follow Ponting's group as much as Polybio groups. E.g. Putrino seems to be working a lot on visibility and promotion of whatever he's involved in. He's everywhere!Or maybe it is all about the connections.
The PE pitch for SequenceME would be something like:This is the thing that I'm wondering is how do we pitch SequenceME or F&Ms studies or the other good underfunded stuff so that these people see the potential for a breakthrough.
As far as I can tell Polybios pitch is just 'find virus, make virus go away'. Which maybe is it's power. But why doesn't 'Sequence all the genes, figure out the mechanism, fast track treatments' have the same power. Or 'this drug might have put half the study participants into remission'. It's not that much more complex of a concept. I guess the whole going all in on LLMs thing shows tech people are very susceptible to hype.
Or maybe it is all about the connections.
And of course uses state of the art AI methods!The PE pitch for SequenceME would be something like:
1) Fast tracks research and funding acquisition
2) Enhances efficacy of drug trials
If they wanted to align themselves with some of the current buzzwords..
3) Enables precision medicine
Yeah that sounds about right. perhaps the people they're getting in to help with funding using the first amount of SequenceME will figure out how to pitch it to the Silicon Valley crowd.The PE pitch for SequenceME would be something like:
1) Fast tracks research and funding acquisition
2) Enhances efficacy of drug trials
If they wanted to align themselves with some of the current buzzwords..
3) Enables precision medicine
But it uses the wrong kind of AI - the actually useful kind!And of course uses state of the art AI methods!
100% agree. What gives me some hope is that their wording seems to change slowly from only „viral persistence“ to „viral persistence and immune disregulation“. Although I dont think they will every completely drop the persistence stuffI do get a little bit frustrated seeing Polybio get all this money just falling into their laps whilst brilliant MECFS researchers are having to go around hat in hand begging for funding.
They don't seem to do a lot of immune research that doesn't revolve around viral persistence, which imo is almost certainly a dead end.
I do wonder if it would be possible to get to the point of visibility where Edinburgh or Fluge and Mella are getting donations approaching this magnitude. After all the reality is they are much more likely to get to the bottom of this than the viral persistance people, if only we could persuade rich relatives of pwME/LC of this fact.
"At the Harvard/MIT Martinos Center, Dr. Mario Murakami and the VanElzakker lab are using ultrahigh resolution 7T fMRI
Are we resigned to it, under this umbrella held over us, are we resigned to the umbrella now that a symptomatic Post-Acute Infection category of chronic illness can be reduced to "Symptoms" at the drop of a hat?
... ... I suppose the NIH is keeping tabs on the:
- various lists that include post-infectious and associated conditions eg PACCS in the Highland of Scotland (Guidelines). PACCS is Post-infectious and Associated Complex Chronic Syndromes.
- various national attitudes eg the German Decade.
"As everybody stated" is not evidence and does not warrant ripping open my envelope for his unbounded inclusion of all similar conditions.
First these were "associated" but only by a resemblance. Thereby they all became included as if they are all a form of ME/CFS.
At least it is now out in the open that someone decided to convert ME/CFS to Symptoms. Then ... etc etc. Is this an invocation or a convocation?
Unsupervised gossips will not differentiate the encyclopaedic resemblances of life. Gossip is raised to the state of the art. The state of the art does not make it science. ..
Like Simon Wessely said, "it is more of an art than a science, but it is a very attractive idea"
I don't understand what you mean about your profile being hacked. Can you clarify?Does anyone here have an idea what ultra-high resolution 7T fMRI can scan that helps us understand ME/CFS? Can we keep our eyes on the ball?
I thought VanElzakker was helping people reach a better understanding, since his friend suffered ME/CFS. I want him to know my profile was hijacked using his lab. Is he on board with this? Did he listen to this video? Can he state a disclaimer to correct what his lab got associated with, seeming to endorse?
Murukami hijacked my profile as follows. He presents this implausible chain of evidence for his ME/CFS hijack. "As everybody stated" is not evidence and does not warrant ripping open my envelope for his unbounded inclusion of all similar conditions. First these were "associated" but only by a resemblance. Thereby they all became included as if they are all a form of ME/CFS. On his say-so.
At least it is now out in the open that someone decided to convert ME/CFS to Symptoms. Then ... etc etc. Is this an invocation or a convocation? Can he not research CCI theory without angling it to get a post-covid scale of funding?
-------------------
"So I want to start talking a little bit about the ME/CFS.
"As everybody stated, ME/CFS is this big umbrella of conditions, and the international diagnostic criteria is basically, Symptoms.
"So it envelops a lot of like causes that are different from each-other.
"Most of them are post chronic inflammatory conditions after an infection... But..."
-------------
Unsupervised gossips will not differentiate the encyclopaedic resemblances of life. Gossip is raised to the state of the art. The state of the art does not make it science. Already homeless, Renegade and Polybio research both stepped off the edge. Enthusing intensely around a table rallied enough appearance of scientific endorsement to launch a proposal.
Like Simon Wessely said, "it is more of an art than a science, but it is a very attractive idea"
Turning science to commerce is enterprising. Can we keep our eyes on the ball?
I don't understand what you mean about your profile being hacked. Can you clarify?
Ah, OK, so you are talking about them changing the diagnostic criteria and list of symptoms for ME/CFS as spelt out by NICE, to something that fits better with what they are seeing in people with CCI?Sorry @Trish and everyone - what I meant was that the established UK profile of ME/CFS is also my profile and Dr. Murukami hacked it, altering my profile to fit the international gossip about what ME/CFS might be if not what NICE established, as a profile