Petition to ask government agencies adopt ICC

35 plus Researchers wrote a letter in September 2013 that they have consensus about using the CCC as case definition for research and clinician purpose.

Why did they not propose the ICC, which where already there. They even mention them in their letter.
Does anyone know why the did not go directly for the ICC?

I've heard two reasons. One is that not all the experts that signed had enough experience/confidence yet in the ICC so they chose the CCC to get wider acceptance.

The second reason was that those who wrote the letter understood the CCC could be adopted since it had been put forth at CFSAC.
 
Thank you, I had to recheck if I mixed or missed something, again. :)

But instead, it seems I was not able to understand what you meant :(
 
Back
Top Bottom