Self-management support needs for individuals with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and their next of kin – a qualitative study
Grønning, Kjersti; Lysfjord, Liv Eli; Røstad, Ann Katrin Hagen
Background
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, disabling condition with limited evidence-based treatment options. Self-management support is recommended to improve people’s coping and quality of life, yet little is known about whether the provided self-management support meet individuals with ME/CFS and their next of kins needs.
The aim of this study was to explore the self-management support needs of individuals with ME/CFS and their next of kin, and to identify barriers and facilitators to effective self-management support in order to inform improvements to existing self-management interventions.
Methods
We conducted an exploratory descriptive qualitative study using a combination of semi-structured individual and focus group interviews with a total of 16 participants (12 individuals with ME/CFS and four next of kin) in Norway. Data were analysed thematically within a constructivist framework.
Results
We identified three main themes. Theme one was named “Individualised and accessible support”, focusing on the importance of timing, readiness, and flexible delivery formats (digital, hybrid, modular). The second theme was named “Continuity and validation”, emphasising current gaps in follow-up care for individuals with ME/CFS and experiences of stigma. The third main theme was named “The role of peer support and practical strategies”, highlighting the value of peer interaction, sharing experiences, and adaptive tools (e.g., pacing, symptom tracking).
Overall, the participants described that existing self‑management support was poorly aligned with their physical and cognitive limitations, lacked consistent and structured follow‑up, and often conveyed contradictory guidance on activity management.
Conclusions
Self-management support for individuals with ME/CFS should be integrated into standardised care pathways, delivered in phased and modular formats, and include structured follow-up.
Digital and hybrid solutions can enhance accessibility. Including peer-led components and family involvement may foster empowerment and reduce isolation.
Training healthcare professionals in ME-sensitive communication and developing national guidelines are critical to improving service quality and reducing stigma.
Web | DOI | PDF | BMC Health Services Research | Open Access
Grønning, Kjersti; Lysfjord, Liv Eli; Røstad, Ann Katrin Hagen
Background
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, disabling condition with limited evidence-based treatment options. Self-management support is recommended to improve people’s coping and quality of life, yet little is known about whether the provided self-management support meet individuals with ME/CFS and their next of kins needs.
The aim of this study was to explore the self-management support needs of individuals with ME/CFS and their next of kin, and to identify barriers and facilitators to effective self-management support in order to inform improvements to existing self-management interventions.
Methods
We conducted an exploratory descriptive qualitative study using a combination of semi-structured individual and focus group interviews with a total of 16 participants (12 individuals with ME/CFS and four next of kin) in Norway. Data were analysed thematically within a constructivist framework.
Results
We identified three main themes. Theme one was named “Individualised and accessible support”, focusing on the importance of timing, readiness, and flexible delivery formats (digital, hybrid, modular). The second theme was named “Continuity and validation”, emphasising current gaps in follow-up care for individuals with ME/CFS and experiences of stigma. The third main theme was named “The role of peer support and practical strategies”, highlighting the value of peer interaction, sharing experiences, and adaptive tools (e.g., pacing, symptom tracking).
Overall, the participants described that existing self‑management support was poorly aligned with their physical and cognitive limitations, lacked consistent and structured follow‑up, and often conveyed contradictory guidance on activity management.
Conclusions
Self-management support for individuals with ME/CFS should be integrated into standardised care pathways, delivered in phased and modular formats, and include structured follow-up.
Digital and hybrid solutions can enhance accessibility. Including peer-led components and family involvement may foster empowerment and reduce isolation.
Training healthcare professionals in ME-sensitive communication and developing national guidelines are critical to improving service quality and reducing stigma.
Web | DOI | PDF | BMC Health Services Research | Open Access