Somatic syndromes, insomnia, anxiety, and stress among sleep disordered breathing patients, 2016, Amdo et al.

nataliezzz

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Somatic syndromes, insomnia, anxiety, and stress among sleep disordered breathing patients
Tshering Amdo, Nadia Hasaneen, Morris S Gold, Avram R Gold
https://www.researchgate.net/public...ess_among_sleep_disordered_breathing_patients (PDF)

Objectives: We tested the hypothesis that the prevalence of somatic syndromes, anxiety, and insomnia among sleep disordered breathing (SDB) patients is correlated with their levels of somatic arousal, the symptoms of increased sympathetic nervous system tone under conditions of stress.

Methods: We administered the Body Sensation Questionnaire (BSQ; a 17-item questionnaire with increasing levels of somatic arousal scored 17-85) to 152 consecutive upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS) patients and 150 consecutive obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea (OSA/H) patients. From medical records, we characterized each patient in terms of the presence of syndromes and symptoms into three categories: somatic syndromes (six syndromes), anxiety (anxiety disorders, nightmares, use of benzodiazepines), and insomnia (sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and use of hypnotics). For the pooled sample of SDB patients, we modeled the correlation of the BSQ score with the presence of each syndrome/symptom parameter within each of the three categories, with adjustment for male vs. female.

Results: Mean BSQ scores in females were significantly higher than those in males (32.5 ± 11.1 vs. 26.9 ± 8.2; mean ± SD). Increasing BSQ scores significantly correlated with increasing prevalence rates of somatic syndromes (p < 0.0001), of anxiety (p < 0.0001), and of insomnia (p ≤ 0.0001). In general, females had higher prevalence rates of somatic syndromes and symptoms of anxiety than males at any BSQ score while rates of insomnia were similar.

Conclusions: In patients with SDB, there is a strong association between the level of somatic arousal and the presence of stress-related disorders like somatic syndromes, anxiety, and insomnia.
 
This study used the same clinical series of 302 UARS and OSA patients from the study below (see that thread for the BSQ also):

Somatic arousal and sleepiness/fatigue among patients with sleep-disordered breathing, 2016, Gold et al.

From the present study:

Six "somatic syndromes" were considered: headaches (excluding morning headaches), restless legs syndrome (RLS), temporomandibular joint (TMJ) syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), fibromyalgia, and CFS.

Three anxiety parameters were considered: presence of an anxiety disorder/symptom, nightmares, and taking benzodiazepines.

Four insomnia parameters were considered: (a) trouble falling asleep, (b) lying awake with intense thoughts, (c) waking up during the night, and (d) taking hypnotics. We consider (a) and (b) as reflecting sleep-onset insomnia whereas (c) reflects sleep-maintenance insomnia.

Each Stony Brook University Sleep Disorders Center patient assessed the frequency of 24 sleep-related complaints on a 4-point scale: 0 = never/rarely, 1 = 1×/week, 2 = 2–4×/week, and 3 = almost always. From each patient’s chart, the frequency of the following complaints was extracted:
(1) Experience restlessness or discomfort in the legs (restless legs syndrome; RLS)
(2) Have difficulty falling asleep (insomnia)
(3) Lie awake with intense thoughts (insomnia)
(4) Wake up during the night (insomnia)
(5) Experience nightmares (anxiety)

These complaints were dichotomized as 0/1 = absence and 2/3 = presence, so that the presence of each complaint meant it occurs more than once per week.

Presence of the following diagnoses/symptoms was extracted from the Sleep Disorders Center’s medical history questionnaire and standardized Sleep Medicine note (both sources make specific reference to the diagnoses/symptoms): chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia, IBS, TMJ syndrome, headaches (excluding morning headaches), and anxiety (an anxiety disorder or anxiety as a symptom in review of systems). From the medication list, we recorded whether or not benzodiazepines or hypnotics were used. The physician’s dictated consultation was also reviewed (when available).

We found that female sex raised the BSQ score by 5 to 6 points among SDB patients, raising the prevalence of somatic syndromes, anxiety, and insomnia among females. In addition, the prevalence rate of somatic syndromes and anxiety disorders was higher for females than for males at any BSQ score, magnifying the effect of the increased level of somatic arousal among females (Tables 2 and 4; Figs. 2 and 3). These disparities between the sexes are not explained by our findings.
In an earlier study of 75 consecutive SDB patients, Gold and associates found that a lower AHI predicted a higher prevalence of sleep-onset insomnia, headache, IBS, and alpha-delta sleep [26]. Patients with UARS had higher prevalence of these symptoms and signs compared to patients with severe OSA/H even when females and males were considered separately [26]. The implications of somatic arousal were not considered in that work. Therefore, to extend the original result, we investigated the relationship of AHI to the prevalence of somatic syndromes, anxiety, and insomnia, controlling for sex and BSQ score, in the supplement to this paper (ESM 2). For fibromyalgia, CFS, and IBS, we found a significant incremental negative correlation between AHI and syndrome prevalence beyond the impacts of sex and BSQ score. For other somatic syndromes, anxiety, and insomnia, the correlations were not significant after adjusting for sex and BSQ score. We did not capture the presence of alpha-delta sleep in this study.
Our supplemental findings suggest a modest incremental role for AHI as a determinant of the prevalence of somatic syndromes among SDB patients. Why UARS patients have higher rates of somatic syndromes compared to patients with severe OSA/H, even after adjustment for sex and BSQ score, remains uncertain.
 
Last edited:
Any research treating "functional somatic syndromes" as an actual thing is unlikely to be good. Isn't half of this forum based on debunking this psychosomatic ideology?
 
Any research treating "functional somatic syndromes" as an actual thing is unlikely to be good. Isn't half of this forum based on debunking this psychosomatic ideology?
I'm not really concerned with what "half of this forum" is doing, to be honest. I'm here creating an archive of the evidence related to obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (UARS/OSAS) and a variety of unexplained disorders to share with people who may be interested in reading about it and possibly researching it (especially sleep doctors, as they will be the ones who will ultimately have to be carrying out these studies) since many people find the Twitter/Bluesky thread format tiresome - if people here want to engage with it that's great, but it's not my primary goal.

Also, there is nothing psychosomatic about a physiological stress response to obstructive sleep-disordered breathing while people are unconscious.
 
I'm not really concerned with what "half of this forum" is doing, to be honest. I'm here creating an archive of the evidence related to obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (UARS/OSAS) and a variety of unexplained disorders to share with people who may be interested in reading about it and possibly researching it (especially sleep doctors, as they will be the ones who will ultimately have to be carrying out these studies) since many people find the Twitter/Bluesky thread format tiresome - if people here want to engage with it that's great, but it's not my primary goal.

Also, there is nothing psychosomatic about a physiological stress response to obstructive sleep-disordered breathing while people are unconscious.

I had hoped you were here to debate the science behind these issues.

It strikes me there is a potentially interesting phenomenon, namely the suggested association between obstructive sleep apnea and various conditions including ME/CFS, which obviously is of prime interest to our members and visitors. In relation to the current study I worry that their defining a range of conditions/symptoms in relation to a particular set of assumptions and then looking at their relationship to questionnaire responses, when those questionnaires were devised using the same assumptions risks being circular and may end up telling us more about the researchers preconceptions than any underlying physiology or neurophysiology.

If stress mechanisms are being postulated we need objective physiological measures if we are going to escape the traps of such as the BPS research into ME/CFS and their unhelpful lumping of everything under a functional heading without any independent objective criteria.

When we suggested @nataliezzz that you present the individual studies behind Gold’s theory of a stress response to obstructive sleep apnea causing various conditions, it was because we wished to understand the rationale behind the theory and evaluate how robust the underpinning evidence is. Sheer volume of papers alone does not do that.

[ sorry I did my usual of posting, then continuing editing having forgotten I had posted. I think my post posting editing related only to the final paragraph.]
 
Last edited:
I had hoped you were here to debate the science behind these issues.
I am. And that was my primary intention starting out, but I'm not really sure many people here are interested in that? I don't think I've ever not responded to an actual question/critique from someone here on the subject. If you want to see the debate that followed the updated/edited AI summary on the theory and my responses to criticisms by @Trish, see here. If you want to see an actual discussion with @forestglip that occurred on one of the threads on the subject, see here. Part of me trying up to build up a more comprehensive picture of what is driving the symptoms in OSA syndrome - which is why I've been adding studies that may seem unrelated (and I'm going to stop adding individual threads for so many of them and just link the URLs in the future) - was because I was going to try to tie them all together into a thread/post about "What is causing symptoms in OSA?" and the two possible OSA "phenotypes," so the kind of discussion I had with @forestglip on that thread re: "If most of these GWI patients just had OSA and improved on CPAP, isn't that just showing that people with OSA improve on CPAP?" can unfold in a more productive way, or so when people say things like this...
The idea that partial relief of GWI, FM and ME/CFS symptoms after using CPAP shows a connection is flawed too. All that may be happening is reduction in some symptoms due to sleeping better, it may have no connection with the underlying illness.
...people can think about: what does "sleeping better" actually mean in the context of OSA syndrome (especially given that a high % of OSA patients are asymptomatic)? And how might partial improvement on CPAP in GWI/fibro patients connect to the broader phenomenon of CPAP generally not being a cure for many UARS/OSAS patients?

It strikes me there is a potentially interesting phenomenon, namely the suggested association between obstructive sleep apnea and various conditions including ME/CFS, which obviously is of prime interest to our members and visitors.
Thank you! I know there's no evidence specifically on people meeting strict criteria for ME/CFS, but there is a lot of evidence related to conditions that many people with ME/CFS have like chronic insomnia and fibromyalgia. I made a thread specifically to discuss the evidence on UARS/OSA and chronic insomnia (since there are multiple supporting studies) - I was planning on doing something similar for fibromyalgia and orthostatic intolerance as well.

Sleep-disordered breathing (UARS/OSA) and chronic insomnia

No one responded to it. So I can't say I agree with "obviously of prime interest to our members."

But I will say engaging with everyone here was my initial goal, but I've realized that it's quite helpful to be able to link the summary of the theory on here to people outside of S4ME - like ME/CFS, fibro, and sleep doctors/researchers on Twitter - because like I said, people find the Twitter thread format cumbersome. So even if there is very little engagement here, it still has value.

In relation to the current study I worry that their defining a range of conditions/symptoms in relation to a particular set of assumptions and then looking at their relationship to questionnaire responses, when those questionnaires were devised using the same assumptions risks being circular and may end up telling us more about the researchers preconceptions than any underlying physiology or neurophysiology.
The current study taken by itself is not particularly strong evidence of anything, it's just showing an association between elevated BSQ scores and prevalence of self-reported "somatic syndromes." But as one piece of evidence in the larger framework - including the study using the same data set that showed reduction in BSQ and Fatigue Severity Scale scores on CPAP - and the evidence on OSA and fibromyalgia, it is important.

And I brought in the restless legs syndrome (RLS) studies and case report because I figured people would probably be thinking "What the heck does RLS have to do with these other 'somatic syndromes'?" and "Yeah, people with RLS are going to have higher BSQ scores because of the symptoms of RLS, but is there any evidence that RLS actually has anything to do with OSA/improves with treatment of OSA?" - yes, there is, and prevalence of RLS is elevated in disorders like fibromyalgia and IBS, so you can start to see how all of this may be related.

If stress mechanisms are being postulated we need objective physiological measures if we are going to escape the traps of such as the BPS research into ME/CFS and their unhelpful lumping of everything under a functional heading without any independent objective criteria.
Yes. I just talked to a radiologist who has UARS a couple days ago and he said he thought the experiment below was feasible (sleeping in an MRI machine poses challenges but is not impossible), and that if there is actually activation of the limbic system in response to IFL that it would likely be visible on fMRI (and he's done a lot of education/advocacy in the medical community related to UARS, so I'm optimistic he might actually have the connections to make it happen at some point in the future):

The crucial unperformed experiment

The olfactory-limbic-HPA hypothesis is supported by strong convergent evidence but has not been directly demonstrated in sleeping humans. The key experiment would measure limbic activation during IFL in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic sleep-disordered breathing patients — or, where direct limbic measurement is impractical, downstream markers like CAP and K-complexes — and show reduction of these findings with CPAP and abolition with more curative interventions such as oral appliance or surgery. This experimental design could also help elucidate a clinically familiar but poorly understood observation: that CPAP produces only partial improvement in many symptomatic sleep-disordered breathing patients. The olfactory-limbic framework suggests one reason: pressurized airflow delivers a different nasal pressure and flow input than normal unobstructed breathing, potentially continuing to drive olfactory – limbic stress responses in a sensitized system even as it eliminates IFL. A complementary experiment could test the effects of nasal anesthesia on limbic activation and its downstream markers, directly probing the olfactory nerve's role.
Cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) and K-complexes are two things mentioned there that can already be measured - and in the case of K-complexes, have already been shown to be directly induced by inspiratory flow limitation (IFL) (using a suboptimal CPAP design to induce IFL) and associated with an objective finding - increased psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) lapses - which when you put it together with the study that showed that increased IFL predicts PVT lapses, already paints a compelling picture - even if we haven't directly measured the hypothesized limbic stress response, we can measure something in the brain that is happening in response to IFL that is associated with an objective finding. The referenced studies:
When we suggested @nataliezzz that you present the individual studies behind Gold’s theory of a stress response to obstructive sleep apnea causing various conditions, it was because we wished to understand the rationale behind the theory and evaluate how robust the underpinning evidence is. Sheer volume of papers alone does not do that.
Sorry, I'm going to try to stop posting so many abstracts for papers and just link the papers themselves in my posts unless they are essential to the theory / more directly related to topics typically discussed on this forum. But I did have an actual goal behind posting all of the studies related to the two OSA "phenotypes" (which showed that objective - but not subjective - sleepiness is associated with inflammatory markers, hypertension, etc. - see below). I do think people need to have a broader understanding of UARS/OSAS and what the evidence suggests about what is (and is not) causing symptoms in different OSA patients in order to be able to discuss/debate the connection to disorders like fibromyalgia, GWI, etc., so I was going to make a post/thread discussing the evidence on the OSA "phenotypes" and tying it into the larger evidence base on sleep-disordered breathing and Dr. Gold's theory (give me a week or so to finish that - it's not just going to be a rehash of what I've already written on Dr. Gold's theory, don't worry).

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom