There's also the possibility that quality of life in ME/CFS is so low because a large impairment to do activities is part of most case definitions. Perhaps some patients have the same illness in a less severe form. But because of the severity requirement in case definitions, they would not be diagnosed with ME/CFS. In neurological illnesses that are based on biological marks, the diagnosis is made differently and there might be less of a selection based on severity.One problem with reducing "quality of life" or "ability to carry out day to day activities" is it doesn't take into account within-disease variation. It says nothing of the degree of variation and overlap...
I have what’s called mild ME I’ve had to retire from my job, having to sell my house to live somewhere more accessible, moving cities because travelling back and forth a 100 mile one hour each way trip makes a lot of my potential social activity out of reach, I cant manage a one basket supermarket shop without feeling wiped out. I can make it out of the house so I’m lucky in ME terms but literally everything I do is affected by ME all the time so yeah my quality of life is badly affected.
I agree but I can still do stuff live alone do all my activities of dailyliving for myself in ME terms it is mild/moderate borderline. But that’s just comparing with people with ME. We had a great thread a while back about severity and terminology. And I definitely vote for ditching mild.That is not mild in any stretch of the imagination...
Yes, if the question was "How many times", why is the label on the left axis in percents?This infographic, at least to me is somewhat confusing