Protocol The remote diet intervention to reduce Long COVID symptoms trial (ReDIRECT) [...], 2023, Haag et al

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by forestglip, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:58 AM.

  1. forestglip

    forestglip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    498
    The remote diet intervention to reduce Long COVID symptoms trial (ReDIRECT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a remotely delivered supported weight management programme for people with Long COVID and excess weight, with personalised improvement goals

    Laura Haag, Janice Richardson, Yvonne Cunningham, Heather Fraser, Naomi Brosnahan, Tracy Ibbotson, Jane Ormerod, Chris White, Emma McIntosh, Kate O'Donnell, Naveed Sattar, Alex McConnachie, Michael E J Lean, David N Blane, Emilie Combet

    Abstract

    Objectives:
    The Remote Diet Intervention to Reduce Long COVID Symptoms Trial (ReDIRECT) evaluates whether the digitally delivered, evidence-based, cost-effective Counterweight-Plus weight management programme improves symptoms of Long COVID in people with overweight/obesity.

    Methods:
    Baseline randomised, non-blinded design with 240 participants allocated in a 1:1 ratio either to continue usual care or to add the remotely delivered Counterweight-Plus weight management programme, which includes a Counterweight dietitian supported delivery of 12 weeks total diet replacement, food reintroduction, and long-term weight loss maintenance. Randomisation is achieved by accessing a web-based randomisation system incorporated into the study web portal developed by a registered Clinical Trials Unit. We are using an innovative approach to outcome personalisation, with each participant selecting their most dominant Long COVID symptom as their primary outcome assessed at six months. Participants in the control arm enter the weight management programme after six months. We are recruiting participants from social media and existing networks (e.g., Long COVID Scotland groups), through newspaper advertisements and from primary care. Main inclusion criteria: people with Long COVID symptoms persisting > three months, aged 18 years or above, body mass index (BMI) above 27kg/m 2 (>25kg/m 2 for South Asians). The trial includes a process evaluation (involving qualitative interviews with participants and analysis of data on dose, fidelity and reach of the intervention) and economic evaluation (within-trial and long-term cost-utility analyses).

    Anticipated results:
    The recruitment for this study started in December 2021 and ended in July 2022. Project results are not yet available and will be shared via peer-reviewed publication once the six-months outcomes have been analysed.



    Plain language summary
    While most people infected with COVID-19 recover within a short amount of time, some people continue to have symptoms for 12 weeks or longer. This condition is known as Long COVID. Roughly two-thirds of people with Long COVID are overweight, a proportion similar to that found in the general population. Being overweight may worsen symptoms such as fatigue, breathlessness and pains. Weight management programmes in adults with overweight/obesity can reduce such symptoms, however we do not know how effective intentional weight loss is to reduce symptoms for people with Long COVID. The aim of this project is to test a well-established weight management programme, delivered and supported remotely, in people with Long COVID.

    The trial is conducted with 240 people with Long COVID, identified through their GP, patient groups, social media, or newspaper advertisements. A total of 120 individuals will receive the personalised, professionally supported weight management programme (treatment group), and 120 participants are allocated to usual care (control group). The one-year long weight management programme involves 12 weeks of total diet replacement (TDR) using soups and shakes, followed by food reintroduction and weight maintenance. Food based alternatives are available to those who are unable, or prefer not to, follow the TDR approach. The two groups will be compared for Long COVID symptoms, weight loss, quality of life and value for money after six months. After six months, the weight management programme will also be provided for the control group. Experiences while on the programme will be documented for 12 months for all participants.

    People with Long COVID have been involved extensively in developing this project. Their priorities are to reduce symptoms like fatigue, breathlessness and pain. They are keen to explore if effective weight management would help their symptoms and overall functioning, especially a programme that can be followed remotely from home. A group of patients and other stakeholders has been set up to provide advice throughout the project.

    Conflict of interest statement
    Competing interests: AM is a member of Clinical Steering Committee for ARC Medical Inc. NS has received institutional grant support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics and honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, Afimmune, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi ML has consulted for Novo Nordisk, Nestle, Oviva, Merck, Sanofi and is an unpaid medical advisor to Counterweight Ltd. NB is an employee and shareholder of Counterweight Ltd., subcontracted to the University of Glasgow to deliver the ReDIRECT intervention

    Full text (PubMed Central) | Trial registration
     
    Hutan likes this.
  2. forestglip

    forestglip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    498
    Registration page says the study ended on 31 May 2024, and they intend to publish on 1 November 2024.
     
    Hutan, Murph and MEMarge like this.
  3. forestglip

    forestglip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    498
    Previous trial studying this intervention in diabetes:

    Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial, 2017, Lean et al

    Link (The Lancet) [Paywall]
     
    Hutan, Murph and MEMarge like this.
  4. tornandfrayed

    tornandfrayed Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    88
    Location:
    Scotland
    Hmm -

    So, rate of being overweight is the same as the general population.

    Losing weight may help some non-ME LC sufferers but this isn't a healthy diet. Surely meal replacements are the epitome of ultra-processed foods, about which there's much concern. Also replacing a normal diet in this way doesn't help people to learn healthy eating patterns.

    No mention of pwLC struggling to buy and prepare food, difficulties with digestion, new food intolerances or allergies.
     
    RedFox, Hutan, Murph and 4 others like this.
  5. forestglip

    forestglip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    498
    The meal replacement stage is only the first 8-12 weeks, then a 4-12 week transition into a full-food diet, which will be eaten the rest of the six months (~0-12 weeks). A counselor will help them maintain a healthy diet. And outcomes will be measured at 12 months.
     
    Hutan, Trish and MEMarge like this.
  6. forestglip

    forestglip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    498
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2024 at 2:43 PM
    Hutan and MEMarge like this.
  7. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    28,299
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    It doesn't sound terrible, but the outcome looks to be a subjective one:
    So, we have the common problem of a subjective outcome in an unblinded study, and confounded by some likely disease-unrelated improvements in wellbeing resulting from weight loss in those participants fortunate enough to achieve it.

    No doubt, if you take a sample of overweight people from the general population and support them closely for months in order to help them lose some weight, there will be some reported benefits. But here, that likely benefit will be mixed up with Long Covid, allowing the people marketing the idea and the soups and smoothies to claim benefits in Long Covid.

    I can't help, in my cynical way, to think that the study is incredibly well-named. Studies like this redirect attention away from the actual cause of the symptoms and teh actual problem, and instead focus on all the usual 'blame the patient' ideas.

    What's the likely outcome? The company making the shakes gets a contract with the NHS to provide this programme to people with Long Covid, and medical professionals can sign their patient up, with everyone concerned feeling happy that something constructive has been done. Not so great for the patient though, who may or may not lose some weight and may or may not keep it off, but probably, after a while realises that their LC symptoms haven't changed much. ... Apart from the select few patients who do lose weight and do recover, who probably were always going to recover, and become svelte influencers, telling the world how Long Covid can be cured by a bit of will power and some protein shakes.
     
    forestglip, ukxmrv, Trish and 2 others like this.

Share This Page