1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Trial By Error: An Open Letter to Dr Godlee about BMJ’s Ethically Bankrupt Actions

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS news' started by Andy, Aug 28, 2019.

  1. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,261
    Amazing sleuth work. Thank you for succinctly highlighting the slipperyness of it all. Surely retraction is the only option open now?
    @dave30th, @Jonathan Edwards,@Carolyn Wilshire
     
  2. dreampop

    dreampop Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    443
    I'm not sure if it's the results or just the graphs. I want to go back and recheck everything because it's possible my brainfog made a mess of everything. It's a very messy paper.
     
    alktipping, Hutan, Annamaria and 4 others like this.
  3. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,855
    Location:
    betwixt and between
    Eleven letters now....
    http://www.virology.ws/2019/09/11/trial-by-error-experts-send-more-tough-letters-to-dr-godlee/

    Again, thank you David and all letter writers.
     
    alktipping, ukxmrv, MEMarge and 23 others like this.
  4. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    51,865
    Location:
    UK
    I love this from Steve Olsen:

    ''Lastly, let me know if you would be willing to publish an article if I replaced Lightning Process with voodoo as the only change in methodology?''
     
    alktipping, rainy, ukxmrv and 23 others like this.
  5. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,269
    Location:
    London, UK
    That would be the Darkning Process then?
     
    alktipping, ukxmrv, MEMarge and 19 others like this.
  6. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Missing the links to your previous posts in this sentence @dave30th
     
  7. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    Well, someone has called the age in which we live "the Endarkenment".
     
    alktipping, MEMarge, Barry and 10 others like this.
  8. EzzieD

    EzzieD Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    532
    Location:
    UK
    LOL! I LOVE that retort! :rofl:
     
    alktipping, Annamaria, Barry and 9 others like this.
  9. Eagles

    Eagles Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    176
    The Science Bit: My letter to the BMJ regarding their lax editorial approach to bogus therapy paper

    https://thesciencebit.net/2019/09/1...ax-editorial-approach-to-bogus-therapy-paper/

    By Brian Hughes

    Here it is. I think it is pretty self-explanatory (nonetheless, I have added some additional context below the fold):

    Date: Sep 11, 2019

    To: <Fiona Godlee>, Editor in Chief, BMJ

    RE: BMJ’s scientifically and ethically indefensible decision about Bristol’s Lightning Process study

    Dear Dr Godlee,

    First of all, thank you for the work that you do as editor in chief of the BMJ. I do not at all mean this as faint praise. While my colleagues and I have expressed our concerns, I believe it is important to note that editing a journal is not always easy. Editors play a crucial part in the production line of science and your own contributions, and those of your editorial colleagues, need to be acknowledged.

    Secondly, I feel obliged to add my voice to those others who have written to you about the paper “Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Lightning Process in addition to specialist medical care for paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial” and, particularly, the associated correction that was published…
     
    MEMarge, TiredSam, Annamaria and 11 others like this.
  10. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Also @dave30th , Rebecca Goldin's letter has a typo
     
    MEMarge, ladycatlover and Barry like this.
  11. dave30th

    dave30th Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,182
    Hm. I added the links. I think I'll leave the typo since that's how it was sent.
     
  12. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Weird, they are there now, suggests it was a glitch at my end I guess.
     
    MEMarge likes this.
  13. Peter Trewhitt

    Peter Trewhitt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,636
    Having used my current mental energy to post a comment on the latest batch of letters to Dr Godlee shared on the Virology Blog, I thought I would make the most of it and share it here too:

     
    alktipping, rainy, MEMarge and 19 others like this.
  14. dave30th

    dave30th Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,182
    Hi, Andy--I had noticed the links weren't there. Then I noticed you mentioned it. Then I added them. No glitch. With the letter, I cut-and-pasted from what was sent to Dr Godlee. So that typo was original.
     
  15. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,295
    Location:
    Canada
    Would achieve the exact same outcome so why not? I would really love that. All the known quack treatments out there would achieve the same outcome if used with profuse promises that it "works". Astrology, LP, piss-on-a-hated-person's-grave, CBT for "unhelpful illness beliefs", free-candy-or-beer therapy, whatever. A fake outcome affecting only perception on self-rated questionnaires, the same outcome nonetheless.

    I really think there is value in adding a deliberate quack control arm to those trials, since the thing that is normally used as the control for nothing is considered big and powerful because reasons. That fact that "nothing as control" performs better than actual "treatments" should be a damn big clue that it's a sham but apparently the opposite conclusion is believed. Again because reasons.

    Normal arm, placebo control arm, quack control arm. For almost everyone of the psychosomatic trial of CFS with loose criteria, there would likely not be any statistical difference between the sham "treatment as usual" and the "holding a chicken foot and dream about not being sick anymore treatment" with relying on the usual biased questionnaires.

    It would essentially disappear the entire body of evidence for psychosomatic treatments so I doubt that would happen but one would think the professional "skeptics" would be interested, except it's a bit too risky for the massive sunk cost that still goes into this.
     
    alktipping, Annamaria, Barry and 4 others like this.
  16. Forbin

    Forbin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,581
    Location:
    USA
    And talk about "cost effective"... a quick Google search shows that you can get a voodoo practitioner to cast a spell for as little as $300!

    [Possibly less if you have a coupon.]
     
    alktipping, ukxmrv, MEMarge and 11 others like this.
  17. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,674
    Location:
    UK
    So a full sized chicken should attract a reasonable discount :D
     
  18. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,041
    Location:
    Australia
    Thanks to all the letter writers. :thumbup:

    One small typo in Goldin's letter. Godlee is mispelt as Goldee.
     
    Forbin, ladycatlover and Trish like this.
  19. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Blog by Steven Lubet about this publishes Rebecca Goldin's letter.
    https://www.thefacultylounge.org/20...od-that-seemed-to-validated-the-so-calle.html
     
    MEMarge, Annamaria, Barry and 11 others like this.
  20. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,269
    Location:
    London, UK
    You need to multiply that be the number needed to treat though, and the amount of benefit in terms of Quality Adjusted Living Death Years
     

Share This Page