UK House of Lords/ House of Commons - relevant people and questions

Eleanor said:
"What is the government doing to ensure the provision of services in areas where local integrated care boards have refused to provide them?"
Click to expand...
How is the NHS going to source consultants in ME/CFS when there is no speciality nor training within med schools?
How will severe patients pathways work? What departments and facilities can provide for their unique needs within the existing stock and what investment is required to ensure every locality has appropriate facilities?

Highly targeted questions pointing out the real problem and what doesn't exist and asking how its going to be fixed.
 
So, how are we going to push things forward?
Mr B wrote to the MRC and NIHR just before the " Showcase Event" and eventually received a reply from someone at the MRC, nothing from NIHR. He had asked about the meeting being recorded for circulation and it was indicated that they " would publish a written overview of the meeting shortly" which they would be happy to share. Nothing has arrived unless it is out there and I've not seen it. We haven't been able to follow up but will. Advocacy is extraordinarily difficult when you are sick and ancient and have gaps of weeks when not functioning.

I do think posing more targeted questions would be a good strategy but I don't know my MP who is a "new boy" and don't have the capacity to start from scratch in enlightening him. I do wish Sir Ed were still our MP.

Would it be a good idea to try to continue to develop ideas as @BrightCandle and @Eleanor have done for a couple of more focussed questions that couldn't be waffled away, that could be fed to receptive MPs? Maybe Tessa Munt would be interested. Maybe done by a small group starting with the suggestions above? I can't offer to be more involved I'm afraid.
 
I’d encourage people who feel they can to try to build up a relationship with their MP or someone in their MPs office. Send them letters, let them know about the issues, share your experiences. It takes time, it takes a lot of effort that could be spent on other things, so is hard for people like us, but if you can I do think it is worth it, although we also need to be realistic.

Some cynicism is entirely justified. And definitely frustration that things are not happening at the rate or with the urgency needed. Or that some charities representing us don’t have a great message.

There’s a great description of petitions I heard, which was they are pointless, except for when they give a government (or other organisation) cover for doing something they really wanted to anyway.

But that does not mean parliamentary questions, lobbying, petitions or just raising awareness with politicians is useless. Decisions are made in that House that do have an impact, either harmful or beneficial. And those decisions are made by people, people who are themselves influenced and persuaded just as all people are. So we should absolutely be making sure our representatives are aware of and as well informed on the issues as possible.

Edit: despite this encouragement I do want to make it clear that if you are not up to it, don’t feel bad and if you are and try and your MP isn’t at all receptive that’s not on you either
 
Last edited:
Binkie4 said:
Would it be a good idea to try to continue to develop ideas as @BrightCandle and @Eleanor have done for a couple of more focussed questions that couldn't be waffled away, that could be fed to receptive MPs? Maybe Tessa Munt would be interested. Maybe done by a small group starting with the suggestions above? I can't offer to be more involved I'm afraid.
Click to expand...

I wonder if there would be any chance of getting a sympathetic MP to ask a question challenging the use of the unevidenced BACME model in clinics. I'm sure it would only be met with the usual waffle, but it would at least make the point that BACME neither serves patients nor represents us. Which may come as news to some MPs who will only ever have encountered them in the role of the good guys.
 
hotblack said:
Edit: despite this encouragement I do want to make it clear that if you are not up to it, don’t feel bad and if you are and try and your MP isn’t at all receptive that’s not on you either
Click to expand...
I have tried, I have fed them a variety of said questions to ask but they just aren't interested and due to the way our dumb representative system works we can't just send it to Tessa Munt or someone else on the APPG to do the representing. So alas what we have to do is share the questions between us and the idea behind the questions to those that are in consistencies that do have MPs who are part of the APPG for ME/CFS (and Long Covid) who will represent ME patients. Its all backwards but that is the archaic system we are working within!
 
BrightCandle said:
I have tried, I have fed them a variety of said questions to ask but they just aren't interested and due to the way our dumb representative system works we can't just send it to Tessa Munt or someone else on the APPG to do the representing. So alas what we have to do is share the questions between us and the idea behind the questions to those that are in consistencies that do have MPs who are part of the APPG for ME/CFS (and Long Covid) who will represent ME patients. Its all backwards but that is the archaic system we are working within!
Click to expand...
This
 
BrightCandle said:
I have tried, I have fed them a variety of said questions to ask but they just aren't interested and due to the way our dumb representative system works we can't just send it to Tessa Munt or someone else on the APPG to do the representing. So alas what we have to do is share the questions between us and the idea behind the questions to those that are in consistencies that do have MPs who are part of the APPG for ME/CFS (and Long Covid) who will represent ME patients. Its all backwards but that is the archaic system we are working within!
Click to expand...

My MP is on the APPG and I'd be happy to be part of a small group to draft a question which I could then put forward (barring unexpected events or crashes, but that's life).
 
I suspect any question put to the relevant minister about problems with clinics using unevidenced treatments would be batted back as being the concern of the NHS, NICE and the ICB's not government ministers. And you would get the usual stock answer about ICB's providing services according to local needs, and the government's delivery plan and NICE guideline and NHS training modules.

They don't do detail of treaments except if a new treatment like the obesity drugs arrive and have massive cost implications. Even there, the government's policy is over whether to allocate more funds to the NHS to pay for it, or whether to tell the NHS to ration it.
 
If AfME is responsible for advising the 'Parliamentary Champion' MPs on the questions, then they seem to be proposing that there are two separate health conditions - ME and CFS. And, unlike the UK government, they aren't using ME/CFS.
“To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has considered guarantees on specialist care provision for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and very severe ME.”
Click to expand...

BrightCandle said:
And should add the big problem with this strategy is we have plenty of people with MPs who will ask the question who are far too sick to be doing it. So we end up with relatively less disabled people unable to represent because of their MP and severe people having to coordinate messaging to MPs who are most receptive.
Click to expand...
Given the Royal College of Physicians' Special Edition, among other things, I feel uneasy about blanket calls for more services. Yes, unless questions are more targeted, they end up just advertising things like 'the Neighbourhood Health Service' that likely has BACME all over it. Perhaps an efficient way to get better questions asked would be to contact AfME and help them?
 
Hutan said:
If AfME is responsible for advising the 'Parliamentary Champion' MPs on the questions, then they seem to be proposing that there are two separate health conditions - ME and CFS. And, unlike the UK government, they aren't using ME/CFS.



Given the Royal College of Physicians' Special Edition, among other things, I feel uneasy about blanket calls for more services. Yes, unless questions are more targeted, they end up just advertising things like 'the Neighbourhood Health Service' that likely has BACME all over it. Perhaps an efficient way to get better questions asked would be to contact AfME and help them?
Click to expand...
There are many problems with Neighbourhood Health Service, bringing in Commercial healthcare and insurance companies is the one that gets missed. BACME need to be investigated
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom