saranbonser
Established Member (Voting Rights)
Very lucky to have him as my MP. He's a good one.Ben Lake, Plaid Cymru, was very touching speaking of 2 of his constituents.
Very lucky to have him as my MP. He's a good one.Ben Lake, Plaid Cymru, was very touching speaking of 2 of his constituents.
Given that the CureME team at the UK ME/CFS Biobank had to get funding from the NiH that is obviously inaccurate.Says research funding requires good research proposals and there haven't been any.
It was the SNP health lead presumably briefed by CMConsidering that it is not, and should not be, in the power of ministers to determine what research gets funded or what NICE recommends, the minister seems to have conceded about as much as he could. Certainly he seemed less combative than last time. Very little attempt was made to defend past decisions.
In addition to Monaghan another Scottish lady made a particularly well crafted speech about the problems with past research, which means that the key problems will be recorded in Hansard.
I have no experience of how things progress from a debate like this in a context like this but one might expect there to be some defensive statements made in public over the next 24 hours.
Certainly it looks as if advocates of a biopsychosocial approach have suffered a dent to their PR campaign.
Now onto Newcastle football club...
He hardly mentioned children or the severe , yet quoted that the severe should get help via non existent specialists.Given that a major concern was the treatment of minors, sometimes enforced by court proceedings, the minister's response that patients are free to accept or decline treatment looked pretty lame.
Yes there are some hostages to fortune in his speech good pointHe hardly mentioned children or the severe , yet quoted that the severe should get help via non existent specialists.
May have been my MP. She requested bullet points yesterdayConsidering that it is not, and should not be, in the power of ministers to determine what research gets funded or what NICE recommends, the minister seems to have conceded about as much as he could. Certainly he seemed less combative than last time. Very little attempt was made to defend past decisions.
In addition to Monaghan another Scottish lady made a particularly well crafted speech about the problems with past research, which means that the key problems will be recorded in Hansard.
I have no experience of how things progress from a debate like this in a context like this but one might expect there to be some defensive statements made in public over the next 24 hours.
Certainly it looks as if advocates of a biopsychosocial approach have suffered a dent to their PR campaign.
Justine Greening popped in to say 'what's needed is research'.......didn't say what type tho.I think it's worth pointing out the far greater numbers of MPs on the opposition bench compared to on the Govt side.
A point that needs raising in that context is that the majority, if not all of those, currently considered 'ME/CFS' experts/specialists advocate CBT/GET and believe ME should be treated as a psychosomatic illness. We don't want more of the same.non existent specialists
Yes that’s good. If we had an appg all those MPs would know that important stuff . It’s good to see that line couldn’t wash after the DoH putting it out widely last year in the media that we were getting significant fundsThe message about the money going on psych research has hit home with MPs
It was the SNP health lead presumably briefed by CM
It would be good if GET/CBT could be suspended in Scotland. - just seen the other thread this unlikely and the discussions in Scotland were disappointingInteresting. The co-existence of the Scottish Parliament (which I assume is led by SNP) and the UK Parliament, with SNP members, may add a layer of complexity to what is going on. Presumably the SNP-run Scottish Parliament decides on health care policy in Scotland (which is independent of NICE) and presumably it is in tune with SNP health representatives at Westminster. The Scottish Parliament seems to have taken seriously Emma Shorter's petition, and it sounds as if the SNP health lead at Westminster is aware of the material there.
Should we be expecting Scotland to announce some sort of policy shift in relation to treatments first? I don't remember this being raised but I may have missed it.
I second this. Not a good afternoon for me, did too much this morning, so grateful to be able to dip in and out of this thread.I just want to thank everyone who has been updating this thread for those of us not well enough to watch or listen.
Should we be expecting Scotland to announce some sort of policy shift in relation to treatments first? I don't remember this being raised but I may have missed it.
Steve Brine is basically saying he doesn't see any need to make any changes or motions. He really doesn't get that people are being harmed does he?
"Everyone can deny any treatment they don't want"
"Everyone can deny any treatment they don't want" - except if they want benefits of course
@dave30th: I really do think Brine needs calling out on this, because it is such a blatant cop-out from responsibility by his department, and I'm sure others I've heard in the past. Here in S4ME we are all pretty switched on, but we are not typical of the general ME population. A great many rely on the advice of medical professionals, because ... that's what people do when they themselves are confused and in need of help, and don't know where to turn to ... they turn to the obvious source of help. The last poor sod to know what is best for them is the patient, more often than not! And in any case, some of the medics would be persuasive anyway. Patients are so very vulnerable.And given the medics are supposed to be the experts - how the hell is a newly diagnosed patient supposed to have any clue what is good or bad for them to want. He is actually making it very clear just what pwME are up against. Hopefully CM's closing words will slam him.