I agree.I guess we'll just have to wait until publication day on Wednesday. Not much point speculating before that. I don't hold out high hopes on the grounds that they don't, from their previous papers on PEM, have a good grasp of what it is, so how did they manage to diagnose accurately, and the small sample size.
Interesting though (for me) that they struggled to find "true ME/CFS" i.e. many (/most?) didn't meet the criteria. I think Jonathan's comment, re this "grey" area being useful, is interesting.