It was being monitored by many.

Legal commentary on the PACE trial, release of data and re-analysis while the 2007 NICE guidelines were being reviewed.

 
Everyone who has deteriorated from a GET like approach in the last ten years didn't need to. There was objective proof it was useless and countless testimonies that it caused harm. The institutions who stuffed their ears and refused to hear the truth are responsible for what has happened to all of us who ended up worse because of exercise etc since then.

Even so, this was a momumental moment in MECFS history.

Thank you Alem.
 
Everyone who has deteriorated from a GET like approach in the last ten years didn't need to. There was objective proof it was useless and countless testimonies that it caused harm. The institutions who stuffed their ears and refused to hear the truth are responsible for what has happened to all of us who ended up worse because of exercise etc since then.

Even so, this was a momumental moment in MECFS history.

Thank you Alem.
That is very sobering indeed.

And infuriating.

Much gratitude to Alem
 
@Andy

Can I confirm an exact figure/ask for when I am contacting my MP? Is that helpful currently? Thanks.
The current estimate for the remainder of the full project is £15m. We do not expect to find that from one funder though, and the study has been designed in such a way that smaller but still substantial amounts can help us make progress towards our larger goal. One example of this is the recent £4.7m from the DHSC that is enabling the part of the study that sequences up to 6k ME/CFS samples.
 
10 years today, Alem Matthees was sent the PACE trial data he had requested and shared it with a small number of us.
I very rarely post on LinkedIn these days but decided to do a longer post today on this:

With a lot of researchers posting less if at all on X, more are communicating via LinkedIn.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom